10
BUILDING THE THEORETICAL CONSTRUCT: APPROACHES TO APPRAISAL, FORMULATING OBJECTIVES AND STANDARDS LECTURE 2

performance appraisal basics

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  1. 1. BUILDING THE THEORETICAL CONSTRUCT: APPROACHES TO APPRAISAL, FORMULATING OBJECTIVES AND STANDARDS LECTURE 2
  2. 2. LECTURE OUTLINE BUILDING A THEORETICAL CONSTRUCT: APPROACHES TO APPRAISAL PURPOSE OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS TRAIT BASED APPROACH BEHAVIOR BASED APPROACH RESULTS BASED APPROACH DESIGNING ACCOUNTABILITIES, OBJECTIVES AND STANDARDS
  3. 3. PURPOSE OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL GOALS AND FEEDBACK THE JOB MODEL PERFORMER, SITUATION, BEHAVIOR AND RESULT
  4. 4. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TRAITS AND BEHAVIORS BEHAVIOR THE MANNER OF CONDUCTING ONESELF ANYTHING THAT AN ORGANISM DOES INVOLVING ACTION AND RESPONSE TO STIMULATION TRAITS A DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTIC OR QUALITY, ESP. OF ONE'S PERSONAL NATURE A GENETICALLY DETERMINED CHARACTERISTIC OR CONDITION. TRAITS MAY BE PHYSICAL, OR BEHAVIORAL DIFFERENCE A BEHAVIOR CAN BE CHANGED; A TRAIT IS ESSENTIALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO CHANGE.
  5. 5. PERFORMER/ TRAIT FOCUSED APPRAISALS PURELY TRAIT AND / OR TWEAKED TO COMPANY REQUIREMENTS AND / OR REFLECTING JOB DIMENSIONSPros Cons Universal applicability Not predictive Easy to design Not accurate Just a judgment no change Accurate judgment still not useful Rater errors
  6. 6. BEHAVIOR FOCUSED APPRAISALS BARS ELEMENTS OF THE JOB, IDENTIFICATION OF BEHAVIORS, THE DIMENSIONS, RATING SCALES (EXAMPLES NOT JUDGMENT / GENERALIZATION) VARIATIONS FREQUENCY SCALE, TRAIT SCALE Pros Cons High acceptability Difficult to identify anchors Greater reliability / validity Difficulty to develop non- overlapping dimensions Behaviors to change Expensive Focus on job content / performance Extensive training
  7. 7. EXAMPLES OF TRAITS AND BEHAVIORS ASSERTIVENESS (AGGRESSIVE OR ACCOMMODATING) PACE (FAST PACED OR SLOW STARTER) DETAIL ORIENTATION (FLEXIBILITY OR STRUCTURED APPROACH) EMOTIVENESS (CONTROLLED EMOTIONS OR DISPLAY OF EMOTIONS) CREATIVITY (CONSERVATIVE OR IMAGINATIVE) SOCIABILITY (RESERVED OR OUTGOING) RUDE BOSSY FINIKY
  8. 8. RESULT BASED APPRAISALS THE MBO FORMULATE LT AND ST GOALS (SWOT, VISION AND MISSION) DEVELOP GOALS IN BUSINESS AREAS (PROFITABILITY, MARKET SHARE) DEVELOP UNIT / DIVISION OBJECTIVES DEVELOP INDIVIDUAL OBJECTIVES (REALISTIC / ACHIEVABLE + CLOSED AND OPEN) THE ACTION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION OF ACTION PLAN AND CORRECTIVE MEASURES PERFORMANCE REVIEW AGAINST STANDARDS
  9. 9. RESULT BASED APPROACH (CONTD) Pros Cons Bridges ST / LT gap Inflexible Effective performance enhancer Excessively result oriented Establishes fairness Complex Establishes role clarity Inadequate personal development incentive Job specific Critical performance aspects assessed only
  10. 10. DESIGNING ACCOUNTABILITIES, OBJECTIVES AND STANDARDS HOW TO IDENTIFY ACCOUNTABLES? HOW TO DEFINE OBJECTIVES? RESULTS /OUTCOMES NOT ACTIVITIES SIGNIFICANCE TO ORGANIZATION PRIORITIZE AND ASSIGN WEIGHT CLARIFY AND COMMUNICATE QUANTIFY AND MEASURE WHAT STANDARDS TO ESTABLISH? MEASUREABLE Q, Q, C, T