46
COMPETING IN THE REPUTATION ECONOMY 1 © 2013 Reputation Institute, all rights reserved. Dr. Charles J. Fombrun Chairman 2 nd Latin American Conference on Reputation 28 October 2013, Medellin, Colombia

02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Compitiendo en la economía de la Reputación. Presentación de Char

Citation preview

Page 1: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

COMPETING IN THE REPUTATION ECONOMY

1 © 2013 Reputation Institute, all rights reserved.

Dr. Charles J. Fombrun Chairman

2nd Latin American Conference on Reputation 28 October 2013, Medellin, Colombia

Page 2: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

© 2013 Reputation Institute, all rights reserved. 2

“Every individual... intends only his own security; and by directing that industry in such a manner as its produce may be of the greatest value, he intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention.”

- Adam Smith (1776)

Page 3: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

1. The New Economics

2. Who is Succeeding and Why 3. The Reputation Journey 4. Beyond Companies 5. New Rules

© 2013 Reputation Institute, all rights reserved. 3

Page 4: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

4 © 2013 Reputation Institute, all rights reserved.

Page 5: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

Adam Smith’s Economics

•  Atomistic buyers/sellers

•  Perfect Information

•  Moral Behavior

•  Tangible Assets

•  Investment Capital

•  Coordinated by the Invisible Hand of the Market

The New Economics

•  Powerful actors

•  Asymmetric Information

•  Opportunistic Behavior

•  Intangible Assets

•  Support Capital

•  Coordinated by the Visible Hands of Stakeholders

5 © 2013 Reputation Institute, all rights reserved.

Page 6: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

© 2013 Reputation Institute, all rights reserved. 6

Concentration of Power with Corporations

The Rise of Enabling Technologies Concentration of

Power with Stakeholders

Page 7: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

7

In this brave new world, what you say

doesn’t matter…

It’s a question of whether you are trusted

& believed…

© 2013 Reputation Institute, all rights reserved.

Page 8: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

© 2013 Reputation Institute, all rights reserved. 8

17%

32%

68%

80% 81%

83% 68% 32% 20% 19%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1975 1985 1995 2005 2009

Shifting Composition of S&P 500 Market Value

Intangible Assets Tangible Assets

Source: Ocean Tomo

Page 9: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

© 2013 Reputation Institute, all rights reserved. 9

Source: Brand Finance GIFT 2013

USA   $11,916   68%  Switzerland   $978   61%  Australia   $875   58%  United Kingdom   $2,050   58%  France   $1,273   54%  Canada   $1,012   53%  Germany   $1,032   52%  Netherlands   $466   49%  India   $626   48%  Brazil   $648   44%  Hong Kong   $520   42%  China   $1,169   35%  Italy   $280   28%  South Korea   $221   16%  Japan   $266   6%  Total Global   $28,305   50%  

Value of Intangibles (Billions of USD)

% of Enterprise Value

Page 10: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

© 2013 Reputation Institute, all rights reserved. 10

Source: Bloomberg (as at 17/9/2013), in billions of USD

Page 11: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

11 © 2013 Reputation Institute, all rights reserved.

…a new marketplace in which people buy products, take jobs, and make

investments based primarily on their trust, admiration and appreciation

for the companies and institutions that stand behind them.

Page 12: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

12 © 2013 Reputation Institute, all rights reserved.

Page 13: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

Reputation is an emotional bond…

…that ensures

License to Operate

Product Preference

Top Talent Acquisition Access Advocacy

Page 14: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

Adj-R2 = 0.827 RepTrak™ Pulse Score

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00

% R

espo

nden

ts w

ho W

ould

Rec

omm

end

Page 15: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

© 2013 Reputation Institute, all rights reserved. 15

Transport  &  Logis.cs   58   62.9  Financial  -­‐  Insurance   105   51.0  Airlines  &  Aerospace   50   47.7  Services   112   47.4  Financial  -­‐  Diversified   45   41.3  Energy   73   37.5  Consumer  Products   39   26.6  Telecommunica.ons   68   26.1  Chemicals   17   22.8  Tobacco   4   18.5  Automo.ve   25   17.0  Food  -­‐  Manufacturing   63   15.4  Construc.on  &  Engineering   56   13.1  Computer   19   10.6  U.li.es   63   10.0  Raw  Materials   52   8.8  Industrial  Products   42   6.6  Electrical  &  Electronics   15   3.5  Informa.on  &  Media   56   2.4  Conglomerate   19   -­‐15.1  Pharmaceu.cals   33   -­‐15.9  Retail  -­‐  Food   56   -­‐17.7  Beverage   26   -­‐18.4  Retail  -­‐  General   148   -­‐46.1  Financial  -­‐  Bank   118   -­‐243.3  Total   1362   112.6  

United  Kingdom   379   228.3  USA   261   151.3  Germany   52   84.1  Italy   69   74.9  Australia   58   60.7  France   36   59.4  Norway   41   43.6  Mexico   36   39.9  Brazil   118   12.7  Sweden   33   -­‐5.1  South  Africa   19   -­‐15.8  Switzerland   37   -­‐45.6  Ireland   50   -­‐46.3  Denmark   36   -­‐53.4  Canada   53   -­‐105.9  Portugal   32   -­‐144.4  Spain   52   -­‐225.9  Total   1362   112.6  

Countries

Industries

Page 16: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

© 2013 Reputation Institute, all rights reserved. 16

Company Country RepTrak® Pulse 2013

Change  in  RepTrak®  Pulse  (2007-­‐2013)  

Cobham United Kingdom 80.6 12.3  Deutsche Post Germany 71.7 9.2  Indesit Italy 78.5 8.3  Volkswagen Germany 83.9 7.5  Siemens Germany 79.1 7.5  Unilever United Kingdom 71.2 0.7  Virgin Group United Kingdom 74.7 1.0  Illy Cafe Italy 79.4 0.3  FedEx USA 76.4 0.2  Boeing USA 69.9 0.1  Berkshire Hathaway USA 70.1 0.0  Mayo Clinic USA 80.8 0.0  Lloyd's of London United Kingdom 66.2 0.1  Statoil Norway 73.5 -­‐0.6  Ryanair Ireland 39.0 -­‐4.1  BP United Kingdom 52.4 -­‐4.1  Vestas Denmark 65.0 -­‐10.8  HMV United Kingdom 56.2 -­‐10.9  H&M Sweden 56.4 -­‐11.8  La Caixa Spain 42.4 -­‐15.8  Danske Bank Denmark 35.8 -­‐17.8  

Page 17: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

17 © 2013 Reputation Institute, all rights reserved.

Page 18: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

18 © 2013 Reputation Institute, all rights reserved.

Page 19: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

19

“Stakeholder interests, risks, and opportunities are deeply integrated in every business decision that we take. Every single project or investment decision comes with reflections, risk maps, and mitigation actions around the particular topic that we’re discussing.”

- Helge Lund, CEO

Page 20: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

20

“We missed the issue of obesity and the value of healthy and nutritional

food. We were behind, while Nestlé was riding that wave. Not being in tune with society, with the benefit of hindsight,

can cost you dearly.”

- Paul Polman, CEO

Page 21: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

21

Page 22: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

22

Page 23: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

23

Business  Ra*onale  

Intelligence  &  Strategy  

Management  &  Accountability  Integra*on  

© 2013 Reputation Institute, all rights reserved.

Page 24: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

24

Business Rationale

Intelligence & Strategy

Management &

Accountability

Activation

50% Say that they Definitely know the business rationale for reputation management, which stakeholders influence the business, what specific business outcome they want from each, and how their company vision is relevant to them.

32% Say that they Definitely have ongoing perception tracking with key stakeholders and they understand what stakeholders expect from them and have translated that into a strong corporate narrative that is used to tell the enterprise story and be relevant to key stakeholders 26% Say that they Definitely are making the reputation strategy come to life for teams and functions through tools and training so that each one can use the intelligence to develop their stakeholder action plans.

38% Say that they Definitely are activating their corporate narrative across all these touch points and they are enabling stakeholders to participate in the story telling.

Source: Reputation Institute, Reputation Leaders Study, 2013

Page 25: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

25 © 2013 Reputation Institute, all rights reserved.

FULL INTEGRATION INTO LONG-TERM STRATEGY & INVESTMENTS

Page 26: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

26

# 1 We don’t have a structured process for implementing reputation management into our business planning (57%)

# 2 We are not leveraging the knowledge we have to be relevant to each stakeholder (45%)

# 3 Internal silos prevent cross-functional collaboration (34%)

Page 27: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

27

Comparison with financial metrics(Telefonica)● Reputation and

other Customer Metrics comparedwith a range of Financial Indicators

● Reputation of Telefonica + Primary Competitor was found to be responsible for 17% of ARPU, 29% of churn and 11% of Financial Metrics Average globally

5%

4%

Page 28: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

28

Page 29: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

29

Page 30: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

30

“…everything  we  do  affects  our  reputa*on,  and  our  reputa*on  affects  everything  we  do  –  this  is  why  we  need  to  manage  and    protect  it.”    

-­‐  Dennis  Jönsson,  President  and  CEO,  Tetra  Pak  Group  

Page 31: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

31 © 2013 Reputation Institute, all rights reserved.

Page 32: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

32

More tourists

Attract FDI Attract knowledge & talent

Increase exports

Improved public diplomacy

Page 33: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

33

What can you do to mitigate the risk?

Visit

Invest

Live

Work

Buy From

Page 34: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

34

Rank   Country  Country  RepTrak®  

Pulse  2013  1   Brazil   57.81  2   Peru   54.86  3   Puerto  Rico   47.41  4   Chile   51.01  5   Argen*na   50.17  6   Mexico   47.02  7   Hai*   45.84  8   Venezuela   45.50  9   Bolivia   43.73  10   Colombia   37.75  

Rank   City  City  RepTrak®  Pulse  

2013  1   Montevideo   61.77  2   Cancun   59.40  3   San*ago   58.65  4   Rio  de  Janeiro   57.55  5   Buenos  Aires   57.52  6   Lima   56.63  7   San  Juan   56.36  8   Sao  Paulo   55.77  9   Santo  Domingo   54.05  10   Port-­‐au-­‐Prince   53.3  11   Bogota   50.20  12   Caracas   48.97  13   Mexico  City   47.17  

Latin American Countries Latin American Cities

Page 35: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

n= 639

Germany

Russia

FranceJapan

UK

Italy

Canada

Colombia Global (G8)

Score

US

37,75

44,73

33,7937,62

44,45

32,18 41,69

29,14

38,41

35

Above 80 Excellent/Top tier70-79 Strong/Robust60-69 Average/Moderate40-59 Weak/VulnerableBelow 40 Poor/Low est tier

Page 36: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

n= 203

Germany

Russia

FranceJapan

UK

Italy

Canada

Bogota Global (G8) Score

US

50,20

53,38

53,4750,64

53,25

45,52 48,49

51,84

45,03

36

All G8 City RepTrak® scores are directional due to low counts.

Above 80 Excellent/Top tier70-79 Strong/Robust60-69 Average/Moderate40-59 Weak/VulnerableBelow 40 Poor/Low est tier

Page 37: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

37

Country Reputations City Reputations

Page 38: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

38

Attr

ibut

e Im

porta

nce

Glo

bal (

G8)

Global (G8)Attribute Score

n = 639

Physical BeautyEnjoyable

Lifestyle

Friendly & Welcoming

Business Environment

Effective Government Policies

Contribution to Global Community

Safe Environment

Operational Efficiency

Quality Products & Services

Brands and Innovation

Culture

Technology

Workforce

Education

3,5

4,5

5,5

6,5

7,5

8,5

29,0 31,0 33,0 35,0 37,0 39,0 41,0 43,0 45,0 47,0 49,0 51,0 53,0 55,0 57,0 59,0 61,0 63,0 65,0

LESS IMPORTANTATTRIBUTES

IMPROVEPERCEPTION

MAINTAIN PERCEPTION

OPPORTUNITYATTRIBUTES

High importance and strong ratings for

Colombia

Strong ratings of Colombia but of less

importance

Less importance and lower ratings for Colombia

High importance and Lower Ratings for Colombia

Page 39: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

39

Visit 43,97 29,95 60,18 82,79

Invest 32,20 17,19 48,26 75,16

Live 30,79 15,86 47,17 75,19

Work 30,10 15,32 47,65 74,32

Buy 39,83 24,85 55,18 81,31

. Study 32,03 16,42 49,50 76,93 .

Reputation Score < 50.0

Reputation Score 50.0 -

70.0

Reputation Score 70.0 +Overall Score

Page 40: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

40 © 2013 Reputation Institute, all rights reserved.

Page 41: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

© 2013 Reputation Institute, all rights reserved. 41

Products

Market Push

Authority

Clarity

Monologue

Messages

Expressive Pull

Page 42: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

© 2013 Reputation Institute, all rights reserved. 42

Page 43: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

© 2013 Reputation Institute, all rights reserved. 43

Page 44: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

© 2013 Reputation Institute, all rights reserved. 44

Page 45: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

© 2013 Reputation Institute, all rights reserved. 45

Page 46: 02 charles fombrun-reputation-institute_(eua)

© 2013 Reputation Institute, all rights reserved. 46

Gracias!

Argentina-Australia-Belgium-Brazil-Canada-Chile-China-Colombia-Denmark-Finland-France-Germany-Greece-India Ireland-Italy-Japan-Mexico-Netherlands-Norway-Panama-Peru-Portugal-Puerto Rico-Russia-South Africa-Spain-Sweden

Switzerland-Turkey-Ukraine-United Arab Emirates-United Kingdom-United States