Upload
stemmark
View
141
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Loan Seeking on the Web
Using online data to track consumer searching habits in
the e-loan market
Jan Lajka | August 2016
Key Challenges
When planning an advertising campaign on Internet, marketing managers need to know how potential
buyers use web based media to get information for their products.
Ideally, they would love to know the answers to the following questions:
• Where would a potential consumer go on the Web to search for information about the available
products in the market?
• How efficient are the different information services available on the web?
• How many visits to its product page each market player is capable to generate via the existing
variety of web services?
A common solution applied for solving this task when dealing with classical media advertising
campaigns is the use of telemetry for measuring the media audience.
Here a pilot study project is presented where Wakoopa's passive metering technologies (S/Marlowe)
were implemented to explore the efficiency of interactive web media in attracting potential customers
to commercial pages offering bank or non-bank loans on the Web.
Loan Seeking on the Web 2
Main Findings 1/2
The banks with the largest number of uninduced visitors to their loan pages are:
• ČSOB
• Moneta (formerly GE Money bank) and,
• Airbank (also the largest rate of page visits per visitor)
Most frequently, the referrers to these pages are search engines (google.cz, seznam.cz).
Among the respondents, who made final decision about loan, prevail the ones who chose
Airbank (20%) and Moneta (20%), while the rest chose ČSOB (10%), Česká Spořitelna (10%),
KB (10%), Equa bank (10%), Fio (10%), non-banking loan (10%).
Raiffeisenbank and Zuno have the highest advertising clickthrough rates, followed by Cofidis
and Proficredit. Most often, these are transactional email advertisements (Zumail), or pay-per-
click ads (Google AdWords, Sklik).
Loan Seeking on the Web 3
Main Findings 2/2
A vivid distinction is observed between the visit rates of banks reached via email advertisements
(i.e. Raiffeisen, Zuno) and of banks reached via search engines (e.g. ČSOB, mBank, Airbank).
However, when parallel analysis is applied to the visits only that are not induced by email ads,
Raiffeisen and Zuno lose their lead in the visit rates. This outcome implies that some
respondents from the online panels have had higher affinity towards transactional email
advertising which seemingly biased the preliminary results in favor of the email-induced visits.
Finally, a clear strategy is recognized for certain banks to provide their loan products (possibly
differentiated) through multiple domains:
• Česká Spořitelna: cspujcky.cz, pujckacs.cz, pujckabezpapiru.cz
• ČSOB: csob.cz, pujcka.csob.cz
• Equa bank: equabank.cz, https://equabanking.cz/cashloans
Loan Seeking on the Web 4
Research objective
To study how people use internet when choosing a loan
Target group
Online population in the Czech Republic
Panelists recruited
Loan seekers (treatment group), N=59: plan to take loan within the
coming 3 months, will choose from several loan suppliers, will search
for information on internet and will make decision independently.
Control group, N=51: respondents recruited for a study on the
popularity of the European Football Championship 2016 (whose
interested in taking a loan should follow natural spread in population).
Field Research Description
Monitoring the internet behavior of PC/tablet/mobile users by means
of Wakoopa technology (installed locally on panelists’ devices)
Data collection period: from 23. 5. to 23. 6. 2016
51%
49%
19%
41%
33%
6%
3%
8%
56%
33%
67%
33%
12%
25%
35%
27%
6%
24%
37%
33% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Men
Women
18-29
30-44
45-59
60+
Primary
Secondary
High-school
University
Sex
Ag
eEd
uca
tio
n
Loan sekers
Control group
Loan seekers, n=59, Control group, n=51 [in %]
Loan Seeking on the Web 5
Study Parameters
Research methodology
Data collected via Wakoopa S/Marlowe
• List of the web addresses (URLs) of the visited pages in the sequence in which they were visited by
each panelist
• Duration of the stay on each page
Information extracted from the data
• Domain – e.g. google.cz, airbank.cz
• Key phrases contained in the URL – e.g. ‘loan’, ‘ibs’
• UTM parameter in the URL – identifier of the source and type of ad (email, pay-per-click banner
etc.) on which user clicked to be re-directed to the advertiser’s page
Identification and categorization of the visited pages
• banking ‘loan’, non-banking ‘loan’, internet banking, non-loan
• search engine, email, web directory, web site, transactional email, news server, etc.
• main bank revelation based on the most visited internet banking page by each consumer
Loan Seeking on the Web 6
Visit generators (loan seekers)
Loan Seeking on the Web 7
The graph describes from which
domain panelists were referred to a
“loan” domain and where they went to
next.
The domain that serves as a referrer in
a reference connection is marked by a
larger indent from the circuit
(e.g. More people visited a ‘loan’ page after following
a reference from google.cz (see the blue reference
connection) than the other way around (see the green
reference connection))
Referrers to ‘bank loan domains’ relations
Loan Seeking on the Web 8
151 transits, 36 loan seekers
preceding
bank loan domains
(ad-driven visit)
following
bank loan domains
(uninduced visit)
The most common reference types are
ad emails (transactional + direct) and
search results (ppc + uninduced)
google.cz
email.seznam
.cz
zumail.cz
ermail.cz
mam
email.cz
facebook.com
usetreno.cz
cz.unicreditbanking.net
mail.google.com
google.com
s.cw
stats.cz
login.szn.cz
seznam
.cz
search.seznam
.cz
pokorunce.cz
ermail.cz
servis.karatsoftware.cz
moneymail.cz
facebook.com
google.com
ibs.internetbanka.cz
pujcka.csob.cz
them
ail.cz
seznam
.cz
zlateslevy.cz
zumailfeed.cz
49 44 13 13 9 7 6 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
rb.cz 53 1 8 6 0 7 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 2 2
zuno.cz 32 1 5 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 3 0 1 1
gemoney.cz 23 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0
cofidis.cz 22 1 1 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
airbank.cz 21 5 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
pujckomat.cz 18 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
homecredit.cz 17 8 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
az-pujcky.cz 15 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
mbank.cz 13 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
cetelem.cz 13 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
prontopujcka.cz 13 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
finpujcka24.cz 10 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
pujcky.name 10 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
proficredit.cz 10 1 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
bbpujcka.cz 9 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
crediton.cz 9 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
equabank.cz 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
aaapujcky.eu 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
pujckanaop.cz 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
csob.cz 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
japonskapujcka.cz 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ferratum.cz 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
akutnipujcka.cz 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
pujcka.biz 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
onpujcka.cz 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
prijemna-pujcka.cz 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
uzasnapujcka.cz 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
multipujcka.pujcky.cz 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
pujcky1uvery.cz 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
bez-registru-pujcky.cz 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Loan Seeking on the Web 9
10
8
6
4
2
0
Referrers to ‘loan domains’ relations
Where they go
Where they
search
The table to the left presents main
relations* between:
• referring web sites (by columns)
• referred loan domains (by rows)
* For better visualization, only a fraction of the whole table is depicted
which includes solely referred domains and referrers with more than 2
visits (resp. references).
The greener is the cell connecting a row
with a column, the stronger is the relation
between the two.
For instance, see the fourth cell on the
fourth row. It implies that 10 out of the total
22 visitors of cofidis.cz were referred to it by
ermail.cz which is the strongest relation
supported by data.
36 35
9
20
50
18
7
25
cpc email affiliate jiné
loan seekers
control group
Loan seekers, n=59; Control group, n=51 [in %]
Ad campaigns
Loan Seeking on the Web 10
23
21
11
8
8
7
7
16
15
10
19
10
3
8
24
10
google/adwords
zumail
direct_mail
usetreno.cz
espoluprace
ermail
seznam/sklik
jiné
AD medium AD source
2 main AD/marketing channels: emailing (transactional + direct email),
cpc ads (adwords and sklik)
References to ‘loan’ domains by transactional mail
11
199 transits, 18 loan seekers
Loan Seeking on the Web
Transactional email appears
to be very efficient web tool for
generation of visits not only to non-
bank but also to bank loan domains,
e.g. zuno.cz and rb.cz
PPC ads in search engines leading to ‘loan’ domains
12
66 transits, 22 loan seekers
Loan Seeking on the Web
PPC ads in
search engines
This way of promotion
is used by two bank domains
(Raiffeisen and AirBank)
Search result references to ‘loan’ domains
13
11 transits, 4 loan seekers
Loan Seeking on the Web
Non-ad search engine links
drove loan-seekers to visit
11 separate loan domains, only two of
which were bank domains
(i.e. Era and Equa bank)
non-ad search
engine links
Loan pages visited – TOP15 The exclusion of email-induced visits leads to
decrease in differential between the top 5 banks and
the rest. Furthermore, Zuno and ČSOB lose their top
ranks in favor of Home Credit, mBank, Airbank and
Česká Spořitelna.
Since only few respondents have opened a url
containing the key word “loan” on a mobile device,
below the “loan” domains they visited are simply
listed:
Loan seekers on a mobile device
csob.cz, imedia.cz, equabank.cz, pujcovnavranov.cz,
japonskapujcka.cz, ferpujckabezdolozeniprijmu.cz,
pekelnedobrapujcka.cz, google.cz, hyperpartner.cz,
slevoking.cz, velkemoznostiosobnipujcky.com,
vyplacenipujcek.cz, budejckadrbna.cz, cinska-
pujcka.cz, cspujcky.cz, gemoney.cz, i-form.cz,
mikropujcka.top, onlinepujckaihned.cz,
pujcka4500.cz, rapidpujcka.cz
Control group on a mobile device:
zuno.cz, pujckacs.cz, novinky.cz, seznam.cz,
aaaauto.cz, facebook.com, google.cz,
zlatakoruna.info Loan Seeking on the Web
14 14
39
31
31
24
19
17
15
15
14
14
14
14
12
10
10
9
13
0
0
2
9
0
2
11
0
4
4
2
loan seekers
control group
Loan seekers, n=59, Control group, n= 51 [in %]
email-induced visits
included 24
17
17
15
15
15
14
14
14
14
10
10
10
10
8
4
0
2
4
0
2
0
4
0
4
0
0
2
email-induced visits
excluded
Desktop
Average number of visits on “loan” pages
Loan Seeking on the Web 15
It should not come as a surprise that a
loan seeker has visited more than six
times more pages on average than a
panelist from the control group.
The average number of non-bank loan
pages visited per panelist exceeds
almost twice the number of bank-loan
ones.
In absolute value, however, the negative
effect of the exclusion of the email-
induced visits from the average number
of visits per loan page is more
significant for bank loans than for non-
bank loans.
3,58
8,13
0,44 0,81
Bank loans Non-bank loans
Loan seekers Control group
Loan seekers, n=59, Control group, n= 51 [údaje v %]
2,37
6,21
0,29 0,53
Bank loans Non-bank loans
email-induced visits
included
email-induced visits
excluded
Ad driven visits to bank and non-bank ‘loan’ pages
Obviously, the domains (zuno.cz
and rb.cz) generating visits via
transactional emailing mainly lose
their top positions among the
control group.
The rank and share of Airbank
remain unaffected.
These discrepancies across
samples imply that transactional
emailing did not have the same
skewing effect on the results of
the control group as it had with
the loan seekers.
Loan Seeking on the Web 16
Loan-seekers, n=59 [in %]
23
13
10 8
5 4
2 2 2 2 2 2
cofi
dis
.cz
rb.c
z
pro
ficr
ed
it.c
z
use
tren
o.c
z
nejlep
si-
au
top
ujc
ka.c
z
air
ban
k.c
z
hyp
erf
inan
ce.c
z
ho
mecr
ed
it.c
z
pen
ize.c
z
po
rad
nap
ujc
ka.c
z
pu
jcka7.c
z
pu
jcko
mat.
cz
Control group, n=51 [in %]
15,2
13,2 12,2
6,3 5,3 4,7
3,9 3,4 2,8 2,2 2,2 2,0 1,8 1,6 1,4 1,2 1,2 1,2 1,2 1,0 0,8 0,8 0,6 0,6 0,6 0,6 0,6 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4
zun
o.c
z
rb.c
z
cofi
dis
.cz
pro
ficr
ed
it.c
z
pu
jcka.c
sob
.cz
air
ban
k.c
z
ho
mecr
ed
it.c
z
use
tren
o.c
z
pu
jcka7.c
z
mb
an
k.c
z
pu
jckacs
.cz
zon
ky.c
z
cete
lem
.cz
pu
jckab
ezp
ap
iru
.cz
pro
nto
pu
jcka.c
z
pu
jcko
mat.
cz
pekeln
ed
ob
rap
ujc
k…
mu
ltip
ujc
ka.p
ujc
ky.c
z
ww
w.z
un
o.c
z
m.p
ujc
ka7.c
z
cred
itair
.cz
uza
snap
ujc
ka.c
z
esh
op
.sb
erb
an
kcz
.cz
firm
y.c
z
pri
jem
na-p
ujc
ka.c
z
rsts
.cz
rozh
od
nu
to.c
z
cso
b.c
z
eq
uab
an
k.c
z
gem
on
ey.c
z
itesc
o.c
z
jap
on
skap
ujc
ka.c
z
bo
nu
s-p
ujc
ka.c
z
csp
ujc
ky.c
z
pekeln
e-d
ob
ra-…
s.im
ed
ia.c
z
uvero
db
uri
nky.c
z
uza
sna-p
ujc
ka.c
z
ww
w.v
elk
em
ozn
ost
i…
zvyh
od
nen
ap
ujc
ka.c
z
Uninduced versus ad-driven (AD) domain visitors
There are two main ways in
which ‘loan’ pages are visited:
• through clickable
advertisements (ad-driven)
• via search engines and
direct visits (uninduced)
ČSOB and Moneta (formerly
GE Money Bank) have the
largest number of unique
uninduced visitors, followed
by Airbank and Equabank.
On the other hand,
Raiffeisenbank and Zuno have
the largest share of visitors
whose visit was triggered by
an ad.
Loan Seeking on the Web 17
0 5 10 15 20 25
usetreno.cz
pujckacs.cz
investujeme.cz
banky.cz
m.gemoney.cz
online.gemoney.cz
csas.cz
muj.erasvet.cz
erasvet.cz
google.fi
finance.cz
zuno.cz
pujcky.cz
kb.cz
usetreno.cz
postovnisporitelna.cz
csob.cz
unicreditshop.cz
mbank.cz
rb.cz
eshop.sberbankcz.cz
cetelem.cz
equabank.cz
airbank.cz
epujcky.rb.cz
gemoney.cz
pujcka.csob.cz
Number of visitors with AD
Number of visitors without AD
Word of caution
Data collected via Wacoopa S/Marlowe enables identification of the sequential order in which panelists
were surfing from one page to another.
Passive web metering allows also for parallel control of the completeness and precision in data
collected from identical sample of respondents via online surveys. For instance, for a respondent who
reported visiting only non-banking loans while filling the parallel online survey, passive data collected
via Wacoopa S/Marlowe showed counterevidence for numerous visits of hers to various banking loan
pages.
On the other hand, the results from the web visit tracking should be interpreted with caution as well
because recorded sequence of pages does not need to imply causality between the sequential pages,
per se. To claim the latter with confidence, an additional analysis should be carried out based on ad hoc
intuition or ex post survey data.
In summary, combining survey data with passive metering data brings certainly higher informativeness
and clarity of conclusions than any partial analysis based on whichever of the two types of data only.
Loan Seeking on the Web 18
STEM/MARK is a leading Czech research agency, member of the World
association for market, social and opinion research (ESOMAR).
Founded in 1994, we have more than 20 years experience of implementing
full-service market and social research projects in various sectors like finance,
travel, media, pharmaceutics, public administration, FMCG etc.
We collect the data ourselves to ensure high quality data and total control of the collection process.
20
STEM/MARK and telemetry
We have more than 5 years experience of collecting and analyzing behavioral data.
Thanks to our innovative web telemetry technologies:
• custom-built web browser for PC and mobile devices
• wakoopa-based passive metering solution S/Marlowe
we are able to:
• collect web behavioral data from our own verified panel of respondents on the territory of the Czech Republic and Slovakia or globally via Wakoopa hub
• analyze behavioral data and provide main results and findings of the analysis, graphically visualized in a final report presented personally or online on the Internet
For more details on the services provided by STEM/MARK visit our web page.
The only way to do great work is to love what you do…
Steve Jobs
KONTAKTNÍ OSOBA
@stemmark
slideshare.net/stemmark
www.stemmark.cz
STEM/MARK, a.s.
Chlumčanského 497/5
180 00 Praha 8
Jan Lajka
Deputy Director
+420 606 816 940
Jiří Axman
Client Service Manager
+420 225 986 882
Contact