Upload
erik-abelsson
View
253
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation of Fournier (1998) and Oliver (1999) in the course Consumer Marketing, Uppsala Universitet.
Citation preview
SEMINAR 3Relationship/Loyalty.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Erik Abelsson Ann-Katrin Bartel
Lars Ohlson Thomas Vareilhes
TODAY’SAGENDA.
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-- 1. Recap
2. Articles
Fournier 1998Consumers and Their Brands:
Developing Relationship Theory in
Consumer Research.
Richard 1999Whence Consumer Loyalty?
3. Comparison(and summary)
4. Break(hand in your questions!)
5. Discussion
RECAP
(seminar 2)
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
BRANDING.
brand equity
Brandscape(starbucks case)
Costumer based
Brand Personality
LOYALTYRELATIONSHIP.
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ARTICLES
Fournier 1998Consumers and Their Brands:
Developing Relationship Theory
in Consumer Research.
Oliver 1999Whence Consumer
Loyalty?
TODAY’S
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Fournier 1998Consumers and Their Brands:
Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research.
The concept of Relationship & it’s legitimation
Brand as a relationship-partner
Relationships add and structure meanings
Relationships are:
Polymorph
Dynamic
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Fournier 1998Consumers and Their Brands:
Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research.
Empirical Study: 3 women, 12-15 hours interview, $100 tailor gifts
Jean
• 59 years old
• Married mother
• Barmaid
• Italian origins
Karen
• 39 years old
• Recently divorced
• Working mother
Vicki
• 23 years old
• Master student
• Living away from
home
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Fournier 1998Consumers and Their Brands:
Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research.
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-
BuzzQUESTION
The development of ICT and in particular the
internet has enabled new types of relationships:
« virtual relationsips ».
Having in mind the Brand Relationship theory of
Fournier (1998), how should those new types of
relationships be interepreted/included in this
model?
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
ARTICLES
Oliver 1999Whence Consumer
Loyalty?
TODAY’S
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Oliver 1999Whence Consumer Loyalty?
Loyalty ≠ satisfaction; but the concepts are
strongly linked
Satisfaction: pleasurable fulfillment
Loyalty: A deeply held commitment to rebuy a
preferred product or brand consistently in the
future.
Ultimate loyalty as an enhanced form of loyalty
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Oliver 1999Whence Consumer Loyalty?
Loyalty Phases and Obstacles to Loyalty
Cognitive loyalty
Affective loyalty
Conative loyalty
Action loyalty
• Create dissatisfaction on different levels of vulnerability
• Switching incentives:Price reductions, coupons, discounts, induced unavailability
• Variety-seeking consumers
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Oliver 1999Whence Consumer Loyalty?
The four loyalty strategies
• Product superiority as the weakest form of loyalty
• Determined self-isolation: The consumer s desire to rebuy a brand can be
based on determined self-isolation; comparable to the concept of love.
• Village envelopment: The consumer is a passive acceptor of the brand
environment within a social alliance that shelters from outside influences.
• Immersed self-identity: This form represents a form of ultimate loyalty as
the consumer found a “natural match” with the brand and its environment.
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-
BuzzQUESTION
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Oliver 1999Whence Consumer Loyalty?
Considering Oliver s theory that some firms will
struggle achieving true loyalty among consumers
and should thus focus on achieving satisfaction
only, what indicators do you think determine if a
firm/brand should create a loyalty program?
COMPARE
Fournier 1998Consumers and Their Brands:
Developing Relationship
Theory in Consumer Research.
Oliver 1999Whence Consumer Loyalty?
LET’S
Fournier 1998Consumers and Their Brands…
Oliver 1999Whence Consumer Loyalty?
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-Relationship
Loyalty and it’s nuances have been
lost in traditional brand loyalty
research.
Loyalty/Satisfaction
A shift from satisfaction to loyalty.
Purpose
Main points
Create a Framework
To better understand the
relationships between consumers
and brands
Interaction
Investigates the interaction
between consumer satisfaction
and loyalty.
Fournier 1998Consumers and Their Brands…
Oliver 1999Whence Consumer Loyalty?
Stress Obstacles
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-
=
Relationship Loyalty
Relationship types Growth of loyaltyEx. Casual Friends, buddies,
marriage etc.
-Congnitive
-Affective
-Conative
-Action
-Enviromental Stress
-Partner-Oriented Stress
-Dyadic/relational Stress
-Consumer idiosyncrasies
-Switching incentives
Fournier 1998 Oliver 1999Szmigin 2003
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Loyalty + SatisfactionInnovationRelationship
Fournier 1998Consumers and Their Brands…
Oliver 1999Whence Consumer Loyalty?
The villageLived experience
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-
≠Active, practical
Brands as partner
Indicators of
relationships
More passive
Interaction consumers
Ultimate loyalty
REFLECTIONSOWN
E-commerce?
Innovation = Loyalty and satisfaction + relationship?
Broader picture
What are the costs of relationships- and loyalty programs?
Fourier (1998) and Oliver (1999) in black and white?
FINDINGSEMPIRIC
Group A2
QUESTION
Some consumers are multiloyal to several brands
and some enjoy seeking diffrent alternatives.
How should companies that aim to have a high
level of costumer loyalty deal with this?
(Think about the articles!)
Group A4
QUESTION
Fournier (1998) states that « Consumers do not
choose brands, they choose lives », this indicates
that brands define people and the self-identity
they pursue. Do you believe this is applicable to
all types of products and services?
In which cases is this not applicable?
Group A3
QUESTION
Have loyalty programs become a hygien factor as
Oliver (1999) was touching upon, and if this is the
case:
How should companies diffrentiate themselves
through loyalty/relations?
THANKS.AND GOOD WORK