Upload
prasoon-bajpai
View
57
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CASE STUDY OF
NATUREVIEW FARM
WHAT WAS NATUREVIEW FARM?
WHAT WAS THE PROBLEM?
background1989
• First enter market 8-oz and 32-oz with plain and vanilla flavor
• Use natural ingredient with longer average shelf-life of 50 days
1999• Company revenue growth from $ 100,000 to
$13 million• Strong Brand image in Natural Yogurt Market
2000
• Expand to 12 flavor in 8-oz cups(86% revenues), 4 in 32-oz cups(14% revenues)
• Exploring 4-oz children’s cup and 2-oz yogurt tube
Important Names• CHRISTINE WALKER - Vice President, Marketing
• JIM WAGNER - Chief Finance Officer
•WALTER BELLINI - Vice President, Sales
• Jack Gottlieb - Vice President, Operations
WHAT IS THE GOAL?
To grow Revenues from $13 MILLION to
$20 MILLION
ISSUESNatureview to arrange for an equity infusion from a Venture Capital(VC) to Fund Strategic Investments
Natureview has to find new investors, or position itself for acquisition and grow its revenues
What distribution channel should be preferred without denting its image?
THE 3P’sPR
OD
UCT
• Natural yogurt (organic)
• 8 –oz. size with 12 flavors
• 32-oz. size with 4 flavors
PLAC
E • Natural food channel
• Wholesale club
• National retailer channel
• Convenience and drug store
PRO
MO
TIO
N • High quality and great taste gave them growth in natural food channel
• Low-cost guerilla marketing
WHAT ARE OUROBJECTIVES?
OBJECTIVE1ANALYZE YOGURT MARKET AND DIFFERENT
DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS?
Objective
WHICH DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL?
2
Manufacturer
Distributor
Retailer
Customer
Manufacturer
Customer
Natural Foods
Wholesaler
Retailer
Natural Foods
Distributor
27%
15%
35%
9%
7%
Supermarket Channel Natural Foods Channel LENGTH OF CHAIN TO MARKET
The u.s.a.’S
YOGURT MARKET
revenue distribution of natureview
0.86
0.14
Revenues 2000
8-oz32-oz
Start exploring kid multipack yogurt product (4-oz)
market share channel wise
97%
3%Distribution Channel
Supermarkets Natural food stores
Market Share by Packaging Segment
74%
9%
8%9%
8-oz. cup smaller Children's multipacks 32-oz. cups Others
market share by brand
Dannon33%
Yoplait24%
Others23%
Private Label15%
Columbo5%
Supermarket Channel
Dannon Yoplait OthersPrivate Label Columbo
Natureview Farm24%
Brown Cow15%
Horizon Organic19%
White Wave7%
Others35%
Natural Foods Channel
Natureview Farm Brown Cow Horizon OrganicWhite Wave Others
market share region wise
26%
22%25%
27%
NorthwestMidwestSouthwestWest
3 DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS
Production Costs and Retail Prices by Channel
Natural Food Channel
Supermarket Food
Channel
Manufacturing Cost
8-oz. cup $ 0.88 $ 0.74 $0.31
32-oz. cup $ 3.19 $ 2.70 $0.99
4-oz. cup multipack
$ 3.35 $ 2.85 $1.15
OPTION 1• Expand 6 SKUs of the 8-oz. product line into one or two selected supermarket channel regions
• Proposed by Walter Bellini ,VP of Sales
OPTION 1BENEFITS• Great Upside Potential
• Unit volume growth of organic yogurt at supermarkets of 20% per year from 2001 to 2006
• Has the highest incremental demand
OPTION 1RISKS• Supporting 8-oz cup size would require quarterly trade
promotions and a meaningful marketing budget
• Advertising plan would cost $1.2 million per region per year in addition to the promotional ads expenses
• SG&A expenses would increase by $320,000 annually • This option creates direct competition with national yogurt
brands
OPTION 1
Channel
Selling price
Margin Cost price
Retailer $0.74 27% $0.74 x 73% = $0.54
Distributor
$0.54 15% $0.54 x 85% = $0.46
Natureview
$0.46 ($0.46/$0.31)/$0.46 =33%
$0.31
Supermarket Channel Margin Analysis
OPTION 1: Income projection2000 2001
Unit Sales 35 000 000 35 000 000 x (1+20%) = 42 000 000
Revenue Growth $ 35 000 000 x $ 0.74 = $ 25 900 000 42 000 000 x 0.74 = $ 31 080 000
Projected Revenue
$ 13 000 000 + 25 900 000 = $ 38, 900 000 $ 13 000 000 + 31 080 000 = $ 44, 080 000
Cost 35 000 000 x $ 0.31 = $ 10 850 000 42 000 000 x 0.31 = $ 13 020 000
Gross Profit $ 28, 050 000 $ 31, 060 000
ExpensesAdvertisement $ 1 200 000 x 2 region = $ 2,400
000$ 2,400 000
SG&A $ 320 000 $ 640 000
Slotting Fee 6 x $ 10 000 x 20 retails = 1200 000
Broker’s Fee $ 16 100 000 x 0.04 = $ 644 000 $ 19 320 000 x 0.04 = $ 772 800
Net Profit $ 23, 486 000 $ 27, 247 200
OPTION 2• Expand 4 SKUs of the 32-oz.
size nationally
• Proposed by Jack Gottlieb, VP of Operations
OPTION 2Benefits• Potentially give higher average gross profit margin than
8-oz size
• Lower promotion expenses
• It also has stronger competitive advantage like longer shelf life and lower marketing expenses
OPTION 2Risks• Doubt on claim of new users would readily “enter the
brand” via a multi-use size • Doubt on sales team’s ability to achieve full national
distribution in 12 months
• Needs to hire sales personnel and establish relationships with supermarket brokers
• The 32-oz. expansion option would increase SG&A expense by $160,000
OPTION 2
Channel Selling price
Margin Cost price
Retailer $2.70 27% $2.70 x 73% = $0.1.97
Distributor
$1.97 15% $0.54 x 85% = $1.67
Natureview
$1.67 ($1.67/$0..99)/$1.67 =41%
$0.99
Supermarket Channel Margin Analysis
OPTION 2: Income Projection2000 2001
Unit sales 5,500,000 5,500,000
Revenues growth 550000 x 2.70 = 14,850,000 14,850,000
Projected revenue 14850000 + 13000000 = 27,850,000
27,850,000
Cost 5500000 x 0.99 = 5445000 5445000
Gross profit 9,405,000 22,405,000
Expense:Slotting fee 4 x 10000 x 64 = 2,560,000 0
SG & A 160,000 160,000
Marketing 120000 x 4 = 480000 480,000
Broker's fee (4% revenues)
367,400 367,400
Net profit 18,837,600 21,397,600
OPTION 3
• Introduce 2 SKUs of a Children’s Multi-Pack into the Natural Foods Channel
• Proposed by Kelly Riley, the Assistant Marketing Director
OPTION 3Benefits• Established leader in this channel
• Perfect positioning for new multi-pack product
• Long term the financial potential very attractive
OPTION 3Risks• Established leader in this channel
• Perfect positioning for new multi-pack product
• Very attractive long term the financial potential
OPTION 3
Channel Selling Price
Margin Cost Price
Retailer $3.35 35% $3.35 x 65% = $2.18
Distributor $2.18 9% $2.18 x 91% = $1.98
Nature foods
wholesalers
$1.98 7% $1.98 x 93% = $1.84
Natureview $1.84 ($1.84 - $1.15) / $1.84=38%
$1.15
Natural foods Channel Margin Analysis
OPTION 3: Income projections2000 2001
Unit sales 1,800,000 1,800,000 x 1.15 = 2,070,000
Revenue growth 1,800,000 x 3.35 = 6,030,000 2,070,000 x 3.35 = 6,934,500
Revenue projection
6,030,000 + 13,000,000 = 19,030,000
6,934,500 + 13,000,000 = 19,934,500
Cost 1,800,000 x 1.15 = 2,070,000 2,070,000 x 1.15 = 2,380,500
Gross profit 16,960,000 17,554,000
Expense:Marketing 250,000 250,000
Complementary cases
6,030,000 x 2.5% = 150,750 6,934,500 x 2.5% = 173,363
Net profit 16,559,250 17,130,637
But what is the
solution?
Let’s Summarize First for
Million Dollar Question
projection Comparison matrixOption 1 Option 2 Option 3
Gross Margin 33% 41% 38%
Unit sales 42, 000 000 5,500,000 2,070,000
Revenue projection
44, 080 000 27,850,000 19,934,500
Cost $ 13 020 000 $ 5 445 000 $ 2,380,500
Gross profit $ 31, 060 000 22,405,000 17,554,000
Expense:SG & A $ 640, 000 160,000 0
Marketing $ 2, 400, 000 480,000 250,000
Broker's fee (4% revenues)
$ 772, 800 367,400 0
Complementary cases
0 0 173,363
Net profit $ 27, 247, 200 $ 21,397,600 $ 17,130,637
decision matrixDecision Parameter
Option 1
Option 2 Option 3
Revenue Objective Exceeds Exceeds Falls Short
Channel Partners Highly Alienating
Alienating Enhancing
Competitive Response
Very Risky Risky Low
Cost to Induce Trial High Very High Low
Brand Equity Dilution
Possible Possible No
Organization Capabilities
Low Low High
Where is
Strategy?
• If we really hard press to answer the $20 million question, then it’s fairly simple answer. Go with option 1.
• We recommend Nature view to expand the multi pack into supermarket channel in Northeast and West
Possible strategy
• High growth (more than 12% from last year)
• Minimized channel conflicts : Through this expansion, Nature view can make it’s revenue goal by 2001
• No cannibalization or alienation
• New target customers : Supermarket will be selling these multi packs relatively cheap
Benefits of the strategy
THANK YOU
DISCLAIMERThis presentation was prepared by Prasoon Bajpai, IIT
Kanpur as an internship assignment under the supervision
of Prof. Sameer Mathur , IIM Lucknow