View
187
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
This presentation looks at challenges and proposals related to the list of ODA-eligible international organisations, looking specifically at trust funds, channel codes, visibility of members' efforts, collecting outflow data, and practical implications of these for the list of eligible organisations.
Citation preview
CHALLENGES AND PROPOSALS RELATED TO THE LIST OF ODA-ELIGIBLEINTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONSDAC/DAC/STAT(2014)9
Willem Luijkx
[email protected] THE DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE COMMITTEE:ENABLING EFFECTIVE DEVELOPMENT
WP-STAT September 17, 2014
1. Introductory remarks2. Section A. Trust funds – guidelines for
inclusion on the List and reporting3. Section B. Channel codes4. Section C. Visibility of member’s efforts5. Section D. Collecting outflow data6. Section E. Practical implications for the
list7. To discuss
Content of presentation
• The draft version of the paper
• Many topics – one paper (Switzerland)
• The 3 functions of the List (Austria)
• Our aim is making steps forward
Introductory remarks
A. Guidelines for including trust funds on the List
-75% of board members should be governments.
-The geographical scope – global/regional.
-A threshold?
-A reporting obligation (proposal US)?
• Proposal Canada: adding “core” and “non-core” to B02 and B03 respectively.
• Proposal Czech Republic: all trust funds B03, independently of their multilateral character.
• Proposal Italy: clarify the footnote.
A. Reporting on contributions to trust funds (types of aid B02/B03)
1. Interested members to send in list of possible new channel codes.
2. Secretariat to assess result and come up with a proposed list for approval by WP-STAT.
3. Members to report using these channels for three years.
4. Secretariat to report back to WP-STAT on the results and to propose a way forward.
B. Tracking flows through organisations without individual channel code (Proposal pilot - Spain)
- Imputed multilateral contributions for multilateral organisation that are reporting on their outflows.
- Assigned sector and regions for non-reporting multilaterals if appropriate (review).
C. Visibility of donor efforts in specific sectors and countries – Imputed multilateral contributions
Norway: what about improving visibility at a national level (internal reporting)?
-The possibility of using multilateral imputed contributions and assigned sectors and regions for internal purposes.
Other options?
C. Visibility of donor efforts in specific sectors and countries – Imputed multilateral contributions
D. Capturing outflows from non-multilateral international organisations
PPrroovviiddiinngg CCoouunnttrryy
PPaarrttnneerr ccoouunnttrryy
MMuullttiillaatteerraall aaggeennccyy
(A) Bilateral
(B) Multi-bilateral (earmarked)
(C) Multilateral (un-earmarked/core contributions)
(D) Multilateral outflows
RReeppoorrttiinngg PPPPPP,, IINNGGOO,, bbiillaatteerraall TTFF
(E) Core contributions to INGOs, PPPs, trust funds.
(F) Reported outflows by INGOs, PPPs, trust funds.
E. What would the above proposals mean in practice?
One “List of Developmental International Organisations” (following the principle of the Single table)
Subsets of that list:
A. Multilateral organisations (Groups 1 and 2)
B. Organisations for which core contributions to those organisations have been
positively assessed on ODA-eligibility (Annex 2)
C. Major Channels of Delivery
E. What would the above proposals mean in practice?
Group Type of organisationODA-eligibility function
Identification function Outflows function
1. Largest multilateral organisations Yes YesOutflow data from the organisation collected by the OECD
2. Other multilateral organisations Yes Yes
Outflow data not collected by the OECD, but a sector and a regional codes assigned by Secretariat to apply to members’ core contributions
3. Largest non-multilateral organisations If requested YesOutflow data from the organisation collected by the OECD
4.
Other large non-multilateral organisations regularly reported on as channel of delivery No Yes No
5. Other non-multilateral organisations No No No
• Para. 9 : Guidelines for including trust funds on the List.
• Para 13. Reporting on types of aid B02 and B03.
• Para 17. Pilot to assign individual channel codes.
• Para 23. Share experiences on improving donor visibility.
• Para 31. The extended methodology for capturing outflows.
• Para 32-33: Implications for the List.
To discuss (page 4)