22
At-Large vs. District Elections Consequences for Representation

District elections for_city_council

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: District elections for_city_council

At-Large vs. District Elections

Consequences for Representation

Page 2: District elections for_city_council

Advantages of At-Large Systems Members represent the whole city, not just

their own district. Reduced divisiveness and factions.

Voters can choose from a broader base of candidates.

No battles over how to draw district lines.

Page 3: District elections for_city_council

Advantages of District Elections Encourages personal campaigning. Encourages attention to neighborhood

concerns. Easier for new candidates to win election. Lower cost of campaigning. Enhances descriptive representation and

shared policy views/ideology.

Page 4: District elections for_city_council

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 Original goal: eliminating Black disenfranchisement when a group is prohibited or discouraged from

voting.

Later extended to vote dilution of Blacks and language minorities. when the votes of a group are manipulated to count

less than those of another group (Whites).

Page 5: District elections for_city_council

Reynolds v. Sims (1964) Voting includes “all action necessary to make a

vote effective.”

White v. Regester (1973) Multimember districts are unconstitutional if they

dilute minority votes.

Thornburg v. Gingles (1986)

At-large elections often present an unconstitutional dilution of minority vote strength.

Page 6: District elections for_city_council

Use of Electoral System by City Size

Small (<25,000 pop.)

Medium (25,000-199,999)

Large (>200,000)

At-large 59% 58% 13%

District 24% 27% 49%

Mixed 17% 18% 38%

Source: National League of Cities, 2003.

Page 7: District elections for_city_council

How At-Large Systems Dilute

City X 9 seats 2/3 White 1/3 Black

Likely result of at-large elections: 9 White council members

WhiteVoters

BlackVoters

Page 8: District elections for_city_council

Music for the Prom

10 students gather to choose five songs to feature at the school prom. Six students like top-forty. Four prefer hip-hop.

Under normal circumstances, the group might agree to choose three top-forty and two hip-hop tunes.

However, if they voted using the winner-take-all voting method, all five selections would be Top Forty.

Source: Lani Guinier: The Tyranny of the Majority (1994)

Page 9: District elections for_city_council

How District Systems Help

City X 9 seats 2/3 White 1/3 Black

Likely result of district elections: 6 White council members, 3 Black

WhiteVoters

BlackVoters

Page 10: District elections for_city_council

Complications…

If racial and ethnic groups are not residentially segregated, district elections will not result in proportional representation.

Cracking & Packing

Page 11: District elections for_city_council
Page 12: District elections for_city_council
Page 13: District elections for_city_council
Page 14: District elections for_city_council

The Bottom Line:

While the ability of at-large districts to represent Blacks has improved dramatically in recent decades… …Blacks are most equitably

represented by district elections.

Page 15: District elections for_city_council

Black Representation All cities:

.82 in at-large systems 1.06 in district systems .77 in mixed systems

Southern cities: .71 in at-large systems .95 in district systems .72 in mixed systems

Source: Susan Welch, “The Impact of At-Large Elections on the Representation of Blacks and Hispanics.” Journal of Politics 52, 4 (Nov. 1990).

Representational parity = 1.0

Page 16: District elections for_city_council

Latinos are abysmally underrepresented in all systems. District elections do not promote more

equitable representation for Latinos. Latinos have fared quite well in at-large

systems in California.

Latino Representation

Page 17: District elections for_city_council

Latino Representation All cities:

.47 in at-large systems .38 in district systems .56 in mixed systems

In California: .48 in at-large systems .27 in district systems .17 in mixed systems

Representational parity = 1.0

Page 18: District elections for_city_council

What Helps Latinos? Latinos do better under district systems

in cities with more residential segregation.

Latinos do better under district systems as their proportion of the population increases (>20%). .65 for at-large systems .71 for district systems

Page 19: District elections for_city_council

What About Hayward?

Would district elections bring descriptive representation for Hayward Latinos?

Latino Residential Segregation Menlo Park: .75 Oakland: .70 Hayward: .29 Fremont: .18 Alameda: .18 San Leandro: .19

Source: US Census

Page 20: District elections for_city_council

Guinier’s Critique District elections are a short-term fix

that merely move the effect of racial prejudice from the voting booth to the process of government. Elected minorities are then outvoted by more

numerous White elected officials.

Surrounding districts are made even more white.

Page 21: District elections for_city_council

What is Representation?

Descriptive Representation vs.

Substantive Representation

Page 22: District elections for_city_council

Summing Up

District elections are better at providing descriptive representation for blacks, but have a mixed record for Latinos.

District elections may hamper substantive representation and ultimately limit minority political power.