Click here to load reader
Upload
lithlithe
View
280
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Radical Thinkers Chart Lindsey
Thinkers Beliefs Radical Nature
of Ideas
Principles of
Classical
Liberalism
Personal Connections?
*Hobbes Leviathan
- Humans greedy
- Must sacrifice rights for security
Gov’t must serve
citizens
*Rule of Law
*Ind. Rights/
Freedoms
I agree no one should be
above the law and
everyone should be
entitled to certain rights
and freedoms (for the
most part)
*Locke - Gov’t accountable to the people
- Reason/logic for
personal gain
- Gov’t duty to protect
private property
No Authoritarian gov’t
*Rule of Law *Self-Interest
*Private Property
Locke supports very individualistic ideas
which I support, like
thinking for yourself and
not following some
authoritarian power
Montesquieu - Participate in gov’t
- Individual worth
Each branch of
government
would keep the others in line
*Ind.
Rights/Freedoms
*Self-Interest
This system of organizing
government makes for a
fair governing body and would prove to be more
efficient than letting one
power control everything
and not be bound by its
own laws
Smith - “Invisible Hand”
- Private business/wealth
- Self-interest = social interest
- No gov’t interference
The economy would run itself
through the
“Invisible Hand”
*Economic Freedom *Private Property
*Self-Interest
*Competition
I believe an economy runs well on economic freedom
and self-interest although
having full freedom does
not work, therefore the
“Invisible Hand” doesn’t
work
*J.S. Mill - “On Liberty”: rights limited by rights of
others
- Must ensure gov’t protects rights
Positive views on the earth and
humans’ roles in
it
*Ind. Rights/Freedoms
*Self-Interest
I agree with Mill’s ideas on individual freedom
David
Ricardo - Wages/population
- Market dictates labour
politics
- Iron Law of Wages
Law of
Comparative
Advantage
*Economic Freedom
*Competition
This would make a very
effective way of running
an economy
Charles
Dickens - Rule of Law applies to
workers too
- Workers without rights have no economic
freedom
Gradual change
instead of
revolutions
*Economic Freedom
*Rule of Law
In some instances
gradual change will be
better than quick
revolutions, but sometimes revolutions
are needed to make a
change
*Robert
Owen
Utopian Socialism & the
Cooperative Movement
- Everyone equal
Democratic
Socialism
*Rule of Law
*Ind.
Rights/Freedoms
A lot of Owen’s views of
men are similar to mine
in their pessimistic thinking except I disagree
with his belief that no one
is responsible for their
own actions
Radical Thinkers Chart Lindsey
I don’t identify particularly closely with any one of these radical thinkers, but on the
political/economic side I would agree moreso with Ricardo’s ideals. Having specializations
allows for better productivity and the opportunity for further advancement in a particular field
which will yield better products/services from the company or individual. Allowing free trade
between countries ensures that countries have products and services they are unable to obtain
for themselves in their own country and allows them to sell their services and products to other
countries, bringing in a higher profit to their country. This individualistic way of thinking
allows individuals (and companies) to have the freedom that fits closely with my ideological
perspective on how I believe countries should run.
*Marx Revolutionary Communism
- Each according to their
needs/abilities
- Classless society
- Proletarian uprising
- Violent Revolution
- Communist Dictatorship
- Dictatorship steps aside when Socialist Utopia
achieved
Revolutionary
Communism –
Socialist Utopia
with no governing system above “the
people”
*Rule of Law For the most part I
disagree with all of Marx’s
ideals
*Edmund
Burke
Founder of Modern
Conservatism
- Intelligent people should lead the non-intelligent
masses
- Humanitarian leaders
- Some deserved rights
- Fair monarchy
Intelligent people
should lead the
uneducated masses through
law and order,
maintaining
customs and
traditions
*Ind.
Rights/Freedoms
(kinda) *Rule of Law (kinda)
I agree with Burke in the
respect that intelligent
people should lead the uneducated masses and
that laws are needed to
keep society running
smoothly (for the most
part)