Upload
headwaterseconomics
View
941
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
This three-page digest summarizes recent research on how increases in housing near the twelve national forests in the Sierra Nevada area of California have led to increase in fire suppression costs. The research focused on 27 wildland fires during 2006-2009. The full paper and other wildfire research can be found http://headwaterseconomics.org/wildfire.
Citation preview
The Cost of Protecting Homes from Wildfires in the Sierra Nevada
Patty [email protected]
Full research paper at http://headwaterseconomics.org/wildfire
20100
100,000 200,000 300,000
400,000 500,000 600,000
700,000 800,000 900,000
1,000,000
1950
1953
1956
1959
1962
1965
1968
1971
1974
1977
1980
1983
1986
1989
1992
1995
1998
2001
2004
2007
Number of Homes Built Since 1950 in the Sierra Nevada Area
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
1,000,000
1950
1953
1956
1959
1962
1965
1968
1971
1974
1977
1980
1983
1986
1989
1992
1995
1998
2001
2004
2007
Num
ber of H
om
es B
uilt S
ince 1950 in the S
ierra N
evada A
rea
Since 1950, more than 900,000 homes were built in the Sierra Nevada study area.
Data not available
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s
Sq
uare
Mile
s
Change in Area of Low Density Development Since 1950 in the Sierra Nevada Area
Since 1950, 1,500 square miles of undeveloped private land has been converted to low density
development in the Sierra Nevada area.
This map shows homes built since 1950 in the Placerville area (east of Sacramento.)
This level of sprawl increases the chances that
homes will be threatened by
wildfires.
An increase in temperature of 1⁰ F is associated with a 35% increase in area burned by wildfires.
Warming temperatures and drought are strongly related to increases in wildfires.
This is more than twice the number threatened during the 1980s and 90s due to the increase in
area burned by wildfires and sprawl.
In the past 10 years, 13,000 homes on average were threatened annually by wildfires.
We analyzed how homes affected daily firefighting costs.
The best model of costs included 5 factors:•Count of Homes•Fire Size•Fire Growth Potential•Habitat (% Forest Cover)•Time (% of Fire Complete)
This figure shows a clear relationship: firefighting costs go up when more homes are
present around the fire.
$57,151
$11,430 $5,715
$1,143 $0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
1 5 10 50
Number of Pre-Existing Homes Within 6 Miles of the Wildfire
Additional Daily Firefighting Cost Associated with One New Home Within 6 Miles of the Wildfire
$57,151
$11,430 $5,715
$1,143 $0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
1 5 10 50
Number of Pre-Existing Homes Within 6 Miles of the Wildfire
Additional Daily Firefighting Cost Associated with One New Home Within 6 Miles of the Wildfire
RESULTSWhat we found:In low density areas, the per home cost can be
incredibly high.
For a 35 day fire, one home can increase the firefighting cost by $2 million.
$57,151
$11,430 $5,715
$1,143 $0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
1 5 10 50
Number of Pre-Existing Homes Within 6 Miles of the Wildfire
Additional Daily Firefighting Cost Associated with One New Home Within 6 Miles of the Wildfire
$57,151
$11,430 $5,715
$1,143 $0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
1 5 10 50
Number of Pre-Existing Homes Within 6 Miles of the Wildfire
Additional Daily Firefighting Cost Associated with One New Home Within 6 Miles of the Wildfire
When there are hundreds of homes around, the cost of each additional home is less (fire managers are probably already doing all they can to stop the fire).
For a 35 day fire, one home can increase the firefighting cost by $2 million.
One new home in an already developed area increases costs by much less.
Keeping development within the existing “footprint” would reduce future firefighting costs by millions.
Policy Implications:
As firefighting costs rise, future policies will need to focus on covering the additional costs
related to new housing.
If the costs were borne, in part, by those who build at-risk homes, or by local governments who permit them, rather than by the federal and state taxpayer,
development rates in high risk areas may slow.
View other wildfire studies & resources athttp://headwaterseconomics.org/wildfire