17
My paper review of ProCCA: Protective Clear Channel Assessment in IEEE 802.11 WLANs YAN-TING LIN A post-baccalaureate student at University of Taipei. May 2016

My paper review of ProCCA: Protective Clear Channel Assessment in IEEE 802.11 WLANs

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: My paper review of ProCCA: Protective Clear Channel Assessment in  IEEE 802.11 WLANs

My paper review of ProCCA: Protective Clear Channel

Assessment in IEEE 802.11 WLANs

YAN-TING LINA post-baccalaureate student at University of Taipei.

May 2016

Page 2: My paper review of ProCCA: Protective Clear Channel Assessment in  IEEE 802.11 WLANs

Outline• Abstract• Introduction• Background and Motivation• Protective Clear Channel Assessment• Performance Evaluation• Concluding Remarks

Page 3: My paper review of ProCCA: Protective Clear Channel Assessment in  IEEE 802.11 WLANs

ProCCA: Protective Clear Channel Assessment in IEEE 802.11 WLANsSeungmin Yoo, Seongwon Kim, Jaehong Yi, Youngwook Son, and Sunghyun Choi

• Abstract—In wireless local area network, all transmissions are preceded by clear channel assessment (CCA), which determines the availability of wireless medium. Ideally, CCA should enable concurrent transmissions, whenever possible, to improve network capacity via spatial reuse. However, current CCA method is inherently limited in exploiting spatial reuse. Only the received signal strength of an incoming frame is utilized for CCA, and hence, the feasibility of a concurrent transmission should be determined without the knowledge of the frame’s transmitter, the corresponding receiver, etc. In this letter, we propose a novel CCA method which utilizes additional information delivered in the physical layer header to properly determine the feasibility of concurrent transmissions. Simulation results show that the proposed method increases network throughput by up to 54% by promoting spatial reuse.

Page 4: My paper review of ProCCA: Protective Clear Channel Assessment in  IEEE 802.11 WLANs

Introduction• Spatial reuse is one of the primary interests in wireless local area

networks (WLANs) since it greatly improves the network capacity by enabling concurrent transmissions in a shared medium. • Medium sharing in WLANs is controlled by clear channel assessment

(CCA) which determines the availability of wireless medium using carrier sense threshold (CST).• Analytic approaches proposed in [1, 2] focus on addressing the hidden

terminal problem, which results in a conservative CST to eliminate all possible hidden transmitters in the entire range.

Page 5: My paper review of ProCCA: Protective Clear Channel Assessment in  IEEE 802.11 WLANs

Introduction - 2• Heuristic approaches based on the frame error rate yield a less

conservative CST by heuristically considering only some possible hidden transmitters [3, 4].• In this letter, we propose a novel CCA mechanism, which overcomes

the limitation of the current CCA by exploiting extra information in the physical layer (PHY) header of incoming frames. • The performance of the proposed method is evaluated via ns-3

simulator, and the results show that the proposed method yields up to 1.54× throughput compared with the current CCA method by increasing spatial reuse significantly.

Page 6: My paper review of ProCCA: Protective Clear Channel Assessment in  IEEE 802.11 WLANs

Background and Motivation• Ideal Operation of CCA• CCA should consider the possibility of capture effect to promote

spatial reuse.

For an ideal CCA, therefore, T2 should determine that the medium with an ongoing transmission is idle only when the concurrent transmission is feasible, i.e., all the four equations, (1)–(4), are satisfied.

Page 7: My paper review of ProCCA: Protective Clear Channel Assessment in  IEEE 802.11 WLANs

Background and Motivation - 2• IEEE 802.11 Frame Format and CCA Method• Legacy-preamble (PB) and Legacy-header (HD) are attached for 802.11a frames,

multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO)-HD and MIMO-PB are further attached for 802.11n frames, and all the shown preambles and headers are utilized for 802.11ac frames. • High CST reduces the probability of the exposed terminal problem but increases

the probability of the hidden terminal problem, and vice versa. • Fortunately, we can obtain many types of information such as data rate, frame length, destination ID from the PHY header.

Page 8: My paper review of ProCCA: Protective Clear Channel Assessment in  IEEE 802.11 WLANs

Background and Motivation - 3• Physical Layer Header Utilization for CCA • Separated from the current CCA using CST, we propose an additory CCA

method which is close to the ideal operation of CCA by exploiting the information bits in the PHY header. • We assume source ID, destination ID, and signal quality are conveyed in

the PHY header to examine the feasibility of concurrent transmission. • In addition, a frame can be recognized whether it is from own cell, i.e.,

own basic service set (BSS), or from another cell, i.e., overlapping BSS (OBSS), based on the source and destination IDs since one of them must be the corresponding AP’s ID.

Page 9: My paper review of ProCCA: Protective Clear Channel Assessment in  IEEE 802.11 WLANs

Protective Clear Channel Assessment• In this section, we present the proposed CCA method, namely ProCCA

(Protective CCA) to achieve spatial reuse by enabling concurrent transmission only when both ongoing and new transmissions can be protected, i.e., both transmissions are likely to succeed. • ProCCA basically works as follows.• 1) Detection of ongoing transmission: If there is a frame whose RSS is larger

than CST, the reception will be proceeded until the frame’s MU-HD is read.• 2) Examination for concurrent transmission feasibility: If the detected

ongoing transmission is from an OBSS node, (1)–(4) is used to examine the success possibility of the ongoing and new transmissions.

Page 10: My paper review of ProCCA: Protective Clear Channel Assessment in  IEEE 802.11 WLANs

• 3) Drop/receive: If the ongoing and new transmissions are likely to succeed, the incoming frame is dropped, and then the medium is regarded to be idle. Otherwise, the entire frame is received. • A. Signal Quality Table • B. Feasibility Check of Spatial Reuse • C. Consideration of Link Asymmetry

Page 11: My paper review of ProCCA: Protective Clear Channel Assessment in  IEEE 802.11 WLANs

• Signal Quality Table

Page 12: My paper review of ProCCA: Protective Clear Channel Assessment in  IEEE 802.11 WLANs

• Feasibility Check of Spatial Reuse

Page 13: My paper review of ProCCA: Protective Clear Channel Assessment in  IEEE 802.11 WLANs

• Consideration of Link Asymmetry

Page 14: My paper review of ProCCA: Protective Clear Channel Assessment in  IEEE 802.11 WLANs

Performance Evaluation• The performance of the proposed schemes is evaluated via ns-3

simulation [8]. • To check whether ProCCA operates as the ideal CCA, we conduct

simulation with a simple topology as illustrated in Fig. 3. There are two APs 30 m apart from each other (such that the RSS of a frame from an AP at another AP is -64 dBm) and two STAs located d1 and d2 away from their associated APs, respectively.

Page 15: My paper review of ProCCA: Protective Clear Channel Assessment in  IEEE 802.11 WLANs

Performance Evaluation - 2• Positive distance refers that the STA is

on the side of OBSS, and negative distance means the opposite side of OBSS. For every combination of (d1, d2), d1, d2 2 {15,14,···,13,14} (m), saturated downlink UDP traffic is generated for both APs and throughput is measured for 1 second. Jakes’ fading model is used and other simulation parameters follow those in TGax simulation scenarios [9].

Page 16: My paper review of ProCCA: Protective Clear Channel Assessment in  IEEE 802.11 WLANs

Performance Evaluation - 3• For the evaluation with a general topology,

we conduct simulation with two-tier hexagonal cell topology with 19 APs. The adjacent APs are 30 m apart, and a single station is randomly located in each cell. Saturated downlink UDP traffic is generated, and we conduct 100 simulations each with different deployments of stations. Aggregate throughput over 19 cells and bottom 10% throughput are measured. Bottom 10% throughput corresponds to the average throughput of the cells whose throughput is in the bottom 10th percentile among the 1900 cells (19 cells and 100 deployments).

Page 17: My paper review of ProCCA: Protective Clear Channel Assessment in  IEEE 802.11 WLANs

Concluding Remarks• In this letter, we have proposed a novel CCA mechanism utilizing

additional information in the PHY header to examine the feasibility of concurrent transmission. Simulation results demonstrate the proposed scheme significantly enhances net- work throughput by promoting spatial reuse.