24
Using GEM’S Tools and Datasets for Calculating Hazard Across the Globe Graeme WEATHERILL Marco PAGANI 10 th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering

Using GEM’S Tools and Datasets for Calculating Hazard Across the Globe

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Using GEM’S Tools and Datasets for Calculating Hazard Across the Globe

Citation preview

Page 1: Using GEM’S Tools and Datasets for Calculating Hazard Across the Globe

Using GEM’S Tools and Datasets for Calculating Hazard Across the Globe

Graeme WEATHERILLMarco PAGANI10th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering

Page 2: Using GEM’S Tools and Datasets for Calculating Hazard Across the Globe

Hazard Modelling: A Global Perspective

• OpenQuake for multiple scales: site-specific, regional and global.

• Hazard Modeller’s Toolkit & OpenQuake Ground Motion Toolkit

• OpenQuake-(Hazard)Engine: Application

– Site-Specific Analysis

– Application in National and Regional Seismic Hazard Models

– Global Scale PSHA

Page 3: Using GEM’S Tools and Datasets for Calculating Hazard Across the Globe

OpenQuake-engine: A Seismic Hazard Tool for Many Scales

OpenQuakeFeature

Site-Specific Regional Global

Classical PSHA(Cornell-McGuire Approach) ✔ ✔ ✔Event-Based PSHA ✔ ✔ ✔Disaggregation ✔ ✔Scenario ✔

Page 4: Using GEM’S Tools and Datasets for Calculating Hazard Across the Globe

OpenQuake-engine

Page 5: Using GEM’S Tools and Datasets for Calculating Hazard Across the Globe

From Datasets to Models: GEM’s Modelling Tools

• GEM Hazard Modeller’s Toolkit (hmtk)

• Currently: different software languages, different I/O formats, different data requirements.

• Reproducibility? Global consistency and quality control? (Lees, 2012)

• Convenience and compatibility with the GEM Hazard Engine

SeismogenicSource Model

SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS

ANALYSIS TOOLS• Seismicity - Harmonising and processing

earthquake catalogues• Geological - Faults sources and activity rates

calculated from geological data• Geodetic – Activity rates from geodetic strain

Page 6: Using GEM’S Tools and Datasets for Calculating Hazard Across the Globe

• Descriptive Statistics• Declustering• Completeness• Recurrence• (Statistical Mmax)

HMTK: From earthquake catalogues to recurrence models

Page 7: Using GEM’S Tools and Datasets for Calculating Hazard Across the Globe

HMTK: From Fault Geology to Seismogenic Fault Sources

Tools to characteriseearthquake recurrence from fault geology

Can incorporate epistemic uncertainty in fault source models

Page 8: Using GEM’S Tools and Datasets for Calculating Hazard Across the Globe

HMTK: From Geodetic Strain to Seismic Activity Rate

Creates activity rate models based on geodetic strain – using the approach of Bird & Liu (2007)

Page 9: Using GEM’S Tools and Datasets for Calculating Hazard Across the Globe

Tools for PSHA Input Model Preparation

Page 10: Using GEM’S Tools and Datasets for Calculating Hazard Across the Globe

OpenQuake Ground Motion Toolkit

• Primary Objective: A Combined Model/Data driven tool to help with selection and weighting of GMPEs for use in PSHA

• Takes as a dependency OpenQuake hazardlib – ensures the GMPE implementations are those of OpenQuake

• Incorporates flexible and comprehensive architecture for storing databases of ground motion records

• Partly developed in the context of the SARA WP6 project

Page 11: Using GEM’S Tools and Datasets for Calculating Hazard Across the Globe

OpenQuake Ground Motion Tools: GMPE Comparison (Trellis Plotting)

Page 12: Using GEM’S Tools and Datasets for Calculating Hazard Across the Globe

OpenQuake Ground Motion Tools: Observation to Model Comparison – GMPE Selection for Site-Specific/Regional Models

Includes:• Log-Likelihood (Scherbaum

et al. , 2009)• Euclidean Distance-Based

Ranking (Kale & Akker, 2013)

Random effects residuals

Page 13: Using GEM’S Tools and Datasets for Calculating Hazard Across the Globe

Site-Specific Application: Single Station Analysis

Page 14: Using GEM’S Tools and Datasets for Calculating Hazard Across the Globe

Site-Specific Application: Thyspunt Nuclear Power Plant

OpenQuake used as independent comparison with FRISK88

Page 15: Using GEM’S Tools and Datasets for Calculating Hazard Across the Globe

GEM Database of Regional & National Models

SHARE

EMME

EMCA

NIED

SARA – Expected 2015

ResisII/Geoter/Garcia et al. (2003)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
New regional PSHA model under construction as part of the South American Regional Activity (SARA) project – expected in 2015
Page 16: Using GEM’S Tools and Datasets for Calculating Hazard Across the Globe

Comparison Against Original Implementations

Page 17: Using GEM’S Tools and Datasets for Calculating Hazard Across the Globe

Comparison Against Original Implementations

Page 18: Using GEM’S Tools and Datasets for Calculating Hazard Across the Globe

Comparison Against Original Implementations

Page 19: Using GEM’S Tools and Datasets for Calculating Hazard Across the Globe

Hazard (and Risk) Modelling at the Global Scale

• Extended Global Earthquake Catalogue

– More than 500000 events (1900 – 2012)

– Combines ISC-GEM, Engdahl Bulletin, GCMT, ISC Reviewed Bulletin

Page 20: Using GEM’S Tools and Datasets for Calculating Hazard Across the Globe

Hazard (and Risk) Modelling at the Global Scale

• Extended Global Earthquake Catalogue

– More than 500000 events (1900 – 2012)

– Combines ISC-GEM, Engdahl Bulletin, GCMT, ISC Reviewed Bulletin

• Depth-dependent smoothed seismicity algorithms

Page 21: Using GEM’S Tools and Datasets for Calculating Hazard Across the Globe

Hazard (and Risk) Modelling at the Global Scale

• Extended Global Earthquake Catalogue

– More than 500000 events (1900 – 2012)

– Combines ISC-GEM, Engdahl Bulletin, GCMT, ISC Reviewed Bulletin

• Depth-dependent smoothed seismicity algorithms

• Global Smoothed Focal Mechanism Model – based on Kagan & Jackson (2014)

Page 22: Using GEM’S Tools and Datasets for Calculating Hazard Across the Globe

Hazard (and Risk) Modelling at the Global Scale

Activity rates for multiple depth layers using a smoothed seismicity approach – including focal mechanism and hypocentral depth distributions

Future developments can incorporate geodetic strain for constraint of long-term activity rates

Combined with the recommendations of the GEM Global GMPE component (Stewart et al., 2014), can produce models of “globally uniform” hazard

Page 23: Using GEM’S Tools and Datasets for Calculating Hazard Across the Globe

Segue to Vitor’s ppt

Moving to risk …

Page 24: Using GEM’S Tools and Datasets for Calculating Hazard Across the Globe

Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Please attribute to the GEM Foundation with a link to -www.globalearthquakemodel.org