Future leaders recruitment report

autumn 2015 AIESEc in poland

Dear AIESEC in Poland,

With a huge pleasure, we would like to inform you about results of autumn’s 2015 recruitment in AIESEC in Poland. As members of AIESEC we spent a lot of time to prepare to this process. We were promoting FL for long hours, preparing a lot of assessement sheets, providing knowledge about this process to LCs and now we should be proud that we gave an opportunity to many young people who want to be part of our amazing organization.

We want to thank all LCVPs TM and every of you that was engaged for your work and effort during these intense months of preparation and work.

We are really proud of you !

Yours,

Ala MCVP TM 15.16 and Gosia NST TxP 15.16

overall results We achieved

94,31 % plans nationally in new

members recruitment

*all data in this report exclude lc szczecin which didn’t provide needed information.

Overall results We had 1526 applications We allocated 778 new members Including 16 returnees

95 TMP-TMP

In general we allocated

889 members

How many people were engaged in recruitment process?

33,3 % 40 %

6,7 %

20 %

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

up to 10 from 10 up to 20 from 20 up to 30 more than 30

In recruitment process were engaged mostly from 10 up to 20 people. In 5 Local Committees were engaged up to 10 members. More than 30 people took part in processes in 3 LCs.

How did you prepare lc members to recruitment process?

15

6

1 1

3

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Training forassessors

Simulation ofrecruitment

Webinar forassessors

Only sentmaterials via

e-mail

Others

15 LCs conducted training for assessors and 6 LCs prepared a simulation of recruitment. There was a webinar for assessors in one Local Committee and in another one materials were sent via e-mail.

73,3 %

26,7 %

Yes

No

Did you use materials recommended by MC in whole recruitment process?

Approximately 175 people resigned after filling the application,

240 people resigned after rb

and 55 resigned after

Group Exercize.

When did you allocate people?

2

12

1 0

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Pre-allocation oneach step of the

process

After interview On LCC After LCC

In 12 Local Committees people were allocated after interview. There was pre-allocation on each step of the process in another 2 LCs. Only in one LC allocation was done on LCC.

How did you allocate people?

1

8

0

3

7

0123456789

Withengagement of

OCPs

Final decisionof LCVP TM

Final decisionof LCVP TM

and LCP

Final decisionof EB

Others

In 8 Local Committees final decision about allocation was done by LCVP TM in another 3 LCs by Executive Board. Only one Local Committe engaged OCPs in allocation process.

What percentage of allocated people are women and what man?

69 %

31 %

Woman

Man

In autumn recruitment 69% of allocated people are woman, 31% man.

One of the LCs allocated more pepople that was planned. Then after skips there was exact amount of people in projects. If some projects there were still too many people that didn’t go to LCC, TM reallocated them to other areas that were their second choice.

How was the gap filled in situation when you didn’t recruit enough people?

In 7 Local Committees recruitment process for returnees was simplified.

Fast tracks were recruited in 8 local committees in general

number of 21 people.

Thank you for attention and engagement in recruitment!