18
G C H B V L K N E S Z D P I O F A

Deindividuation evaluation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Deindividuation Revisit

GCHBVLKNESZDPIO

F

A

Deindividuation RevisitRecap Deindividuation TheoryA02 for Deindividuation TheoryPlan a 20 mark question on Deindividuation

Evaluation of Deindividuation theorySupported by Research

Watson (1974) evaluated 23 cultures to determine whether warriors who used war paint or masks in battle treated their victims differently

80 percent of warriors in these cultures were found to be more destructive--for example, killing, torturing or mutilating their victims--than unpainted or unmasked warriors.

3

Evaluation of Deindividuation theoryWatson (1974)

80% of warriors in these cultures (painted) were found to be more destructive to their victims during war

80 percent of warriors in these cultures were found to be more destructive--for example, killing, torturing or mutilating their victims--than unpainted or unmasked warriors.

4

Evaluation of Deindividuation theorySupported by Research

Mann et al (1981) analysed 21 incidents of suicide in the 60s and 70s. 10 of these cases had people baiting the person to jump. These all occurred when the crowd was large, it was at night and there was a large distance from the jumper

5

Evaluation of Deindividuation theorySupported by Research

Diener (1976) Field study1,300 Trick or Treaters Trick or treaters instructed to take sweets from a bowl in the living room

6

Diener (1976)

Deiner (1976)Incidents of anti-social behaviour (stealing) went from 8% to 80% when the child is deindividuated!

Evaluation of Deindividuation theory Postmes & Spears (1998)

1. Deindividuation increases conformity of aggressive behaviour in aggressive crowds

2. Reduced focus on individual self, but not total disappearance

Evaluation of Deindividuation theory Removes blame from the individual

Free will & determinism we have no control over our behaviours11

Evaluation of Deindividuation theory Anonymity among in-group or out-group?

Evaluation of Deindividuation theory Deindividuation does not always lead to aggression

Gergen et al (1973) 12 Ppts taken to a dark room (were unable to identify each other)First 15 minutes polite/small talkBy 60 minutes, inhibitions had lowered and ppts got physical

Gergens Dark Room experimentMore than half the participants had cuddled

80% of participants claimed to have felt sexually aroused

Outline and Evaluate Deindividuation theory as an explanation for aggression (20 Marks)A01 = 4 marks

Briefly outline Deindividuation Theory Stemmed from Le Bon OR Festinger first coined the term Deindividuation What are the characteristics (Diener)

Outline and Evaluate Deindividuation theory as an explanation for aggression (20 Marks)A02

Supporting research: Zimbardo (1965); SFE Zimbardo; Deiner; Mann; WatsonRefuting points:Gergen; Postmes & Spears

Outline and Evaluate Deindividuation theory as an explanation for aggression (20 Marks)A03

Outline and Evaluate Deindividuation theory as an explanation for aggression (20 Marks)

GenderReductionistEthical Guidelines?Nature vs. NurtureAnimal StudiesDeterminsm vs. Free WillEthnocentricism

A03