23
Research impact: the university perspective Julie Bayley Former Impact Officer Researcher & Health Psychologist Coventry University [email protected] @JulieEBayley Winner 2015 - Impact

Research impact: the University perspective

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Research impact: the University perspective

Research impact: the university perspective

Julie BayleyFormer Impact Officer

Researcher & Health PsychologistCoventry University

[email protected]@JulieEBayley

Winner 2015 - Impact

Page 2: Research impact: the University perspective

A quick intro….• Health Psychologist– Applied researcher >12 years– Interventions and behaviour change

• Coventry University Impact officer (2014-6)– Impact planning, strategy and training

• Association of Research Managers and Administrators (ARMA)– Impact Special Interest Group co-lead– Training and Development committee

Page 3: Research impact: the University perspective

Coventry context

• Top Modern University 2014/5

• Historically teaching / applied research

• Extensive growth/change

• Health psychology, nursing, midwifery, allied health and biomedical expertise

www.coventry.ac.uk

Page 4: Research impact: the University perspective

Key drivers

Assessment (REF)

Public benefit and social responsibility

Funding

Page 5: Research impact: the University perspective

Research Impact:• 'the demonstrable contribution that excellent

research makes to society and the economy‘ (RCUK).

• ‘For the purposes of the REF, impact is defined as an effect on, change or benefit to the economy, society, culture, public policy or services, health, the environment or quality of life, beyond academia’ (HEFCE)

Page 6: Research impact: the University perspective

Research Impact:• 'the demonstrable contribution that excellent

research makes to society and the economy‘ (Research Councils).

• ‘For the purposes of the REF, impact is defined as an effect on, change or benefit to the economy, society, culture, public policy or services, health, the environment or quality of life, beyond academia’ (HEFCE)

Page 7: Research impact: the University perspective

Impact is changeImpact occurs when research is successfully translated

into practice, e.g.:

Access to servicesQuality of lifeCondition managementEffectiveness of therapyConfidence

MortalitySeverity of symptoms

Medicine wasteMisdiagnosisIm

prov

ed

Reduced

Page 8: Research impact: the University perspective

For (REF 2014) assessment…• High quality (2* and above) research

– List papers and grants

• Conducted at the institution since 1993– Even in academic leaves, university ‘keeps’ impact

• Case studies showing direct link (research to effects)– Not individual expertise / consultancy

• Evidenced (and auditable) change– Not provable, not submissible

• Impact judged as unclassified or 1-4*

Awaiting REF2021

rules

Page 9: Research impact: the University perspective

For funding…• Funder impact is broader than REF impact– Often includes ‘academic impact’

• Increased emphasis on impact in proposal content

• Impact ‘appears’ in various forms– e.g. innovation, change, benefits, making a

difference……

• Very competitive

Page 11: Research impact: the University perspective

Shifting from simplistic knowledge transfer / exchange…

Page 12: Research impact: the University perspective

Co-production

…to knowledge mobilisation and co-

production

Page 13: Research impact: the University perspective

Capturing and demonstrating impact

• Need to be able to PROVE change has happened

• No single or ‘gold standard’ way to do this• It’s about appropriateness and strength of

evidence…..

Page 14: Research impact: the University perspective

Example types of evidence• Testimonials• ‘Data’ (survey, service access…)• Awards• Patents• Policy citation• Practitioner guidance change• Organisational reports

Page 15: Research impact: the University perspective

Capturing and demonstrating impact

Four key questions1. What changes?

Page 16: Research impact: the University perspective

Capturing and demonstrating impact

Four key questions1. What changes?

Big or smallDon’t dismiss small changes….they add up eg:• Improved staff awareness• Improved patient engagementIs there a sequence of changes?

Page 17: Research impact: the University perspective

Capturing and demonstrating impact

Four key questions1. What changes?2. How will you know?

Page 18: Research impact: the University perspective

Capturing and demonstrating impact

Four key questions1. What changes?2. How will you know?

What information could tell you the change has happened? Who could tell you? How can you track? Who do you need to partner with?

Page 19: Research impact: the University perspective

Capturing and demonstrating impact

Four key questions1. What changes?2. How will you know?3. How could you most appropriately/strongly

‘prove’ it?

Page 20: Research impact: the University perspective

Capturing and demonstrating impact

Four key questions1. What changes?2. How will you know?3. How could you most appropriately/strongly

‘prove’ it?Can you measure it? Or do you need to get patient feedback? What method is most suitable?

Page 21: Research impact: the University perspective

Capturing and demonstrating impact

Four key questions1. What changes?2. How will you know?3. How could you most appropriately/strongly

‘prove’ it?4. How will you record it?

Page 22: Research impact: the University perspective

Summary and ‘where next?’• Impact = provable change

• Higher Education sector experienced but still overcoming challenges

• Asking the right questions - reflecting the topic/health condition – points you at the right indicators and evidence

Page 23: Research impact: the University perspective

Thanks

Any questions?

Julie [email protected]

@JulieEBayley