140
Ignacio S. Caballero bioinformatics graduate program Boston University Using the Host Immune Response To Hemorrhagic Fever Viruses To Understand Pathogenesis and Improve Diagnostics Connor Lab National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories

Using the Host Immune Response to Hemorrhagic Fever Viruses to Understand Pathogenesis and Improve Diagnostics

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Ignacio S. Caballero

    bioinformatics graduate programBoston University

    Using the Host Immune Response To Hemorrhagic Fever Viruses

    To Understand Pathogenesis and Improve Diagnostics

    Connor Lab

    National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories

  • Understanding the host immune response to Ebola virus infection

    Part I

  • Part IIDistinguishing between hemorrhagic fevers

    by using the host immune response

    Understanding the host immune response to Ebola virus infection

    Part I

  • Why focus on the host immune response?

  • Why focus on the host immune response?

    1. Hemorrhagic fever symptoms are likely caused by a dysregulated host response

  • Why focus on the host immune response?

    2. We can measure the activity of the players but we dont understand a lot of the rules

    1. Hemorrhagic fever symptoms are likely caused by a dysregulated host response

  • Hemorrhagic Fever Viruses

    Marburg

    Bryan Hansen RML, NIAID

    Ebola

    CDC Public Health Library

  • Hemorrhagic Fever Viruses

    Marburg

    Bryan Hansen RML, NIAID

    LassaCDC Public

    Health Library

    Ebola

    CDC Public Health Library

  • Geographical distribution

    Ebola(pre-2014)

  • Geographical distribution

    MarburgEbola(pre-2014)

  • Geographical distribution

    MarburgEbola(post-2014)

  • Geographical distribution

    MarburgEbola(post-2014)

    Lassa

  • Hemorrhagic fevers share similar symptoms

    Ebola & Marburg

    Lassa

    Early

    Headache

    Malaise

    Fever

    Malaise

    Sore throat

    Fever

    Weakness

    Weakness

    Headache

  • Hemorrhagic fevers share similar symptoms

    Ebola & Marburg

    Lassa

    Early

    Headache

    Malaise

    Fever

    Malaise

    Sore throat

    Fever

    Weakness

    Weakness

    Headache

    Vomiting

    Diarrhea

    Middle

    Diarrhea

    Joint pain

    Rash

    Pharyngitis

    Pharyngitis

    Vomiting

  • Hemorrhagic fevers share similar symptoms

    Ebola & Marburg

    Lassa

    Early

    Headache

    Malaise

    Fever

    Malaise

    Sore throat

    Fever

    Weakness

    Weakness

    Headache

    Vomiting

    Diarrhea

    Middle

    Diarrhea

    Joint pain

    Rash

    Pharyngitis

    Pharyngitis

    Vomiting

    Late

    Multiorgan failure

    Diffuse coagulopathy

    Hypovolemic shock

    Mucosal bleeding

    Hypovolemic shock

    Pulmonary edema

    Edema

    Multiorgan failure

    Mucosal bleeding

  • Reasons to study hemorrhagic fever viruses

    1. Difficult to diagnose during the early stages

  • Reasons to study hemorrhagic fever viruses

    2. High mortality rates

    1. Difficult to diagnose during the early stages

  • Reasons to study hemorrhagic fever viruses

    3. Lack of treatments and vaccines

    2. High mortality rates

    1. Difficult to diagnose during the early stages

  • Reasons to study hemorrhagic fever viruses

    3. Lack of treatments and vaccines

    2. High mortality rates

    1. Difficult to diagnose during the early stages

    4. Potential to be used as bioweapons

  • Part IIDistinguishing between hemorrhagic fevers

    by using the host immune response

    Understanding the host immune response to Ebola virus infection

    Part I

  • We use animal models to study the immune response

    Macaque

  • We use animal models to study the immune response

    Macaque

    Blood

    Ebola virus infection

  • We use animal models to study the immune response

    Immune Cells

    Centrifugation

    Macaque

    Blood

    Ebola virus infection

  • We use animal models to study the immune response

    Immune Cell RNA

    RNA Extraction

    Immune Cells

    Centrifugation

    Macaque

    Blood

    Ebola virus infection

  • We use animal models to study the immune response

    Immune Cell RNA

    RNA Extraction

    Immune Cells

    Centrifugation

    Macaque

    Blood

    Ebola virus infection

    at BSL-4 at BU

  • We use animal models to study the immune response

    Immune Cell RNA

    RNA Extraction

    Immune Cells

    Centrifugation

    Macaque

    Blood

    Ebola virus infection

    at BSL-4 at BU

    Sequenced Reads

    RNA Sequencing

  • We use animal models to study the immune response

    Immune Cell RNA

    RNA Extraction

    GENE

    Alignment & Quantification

    Gene Expression Levels

    Immune Cells

    Centrifugation

    Macaque

    Blood

    Ebola virus infection

    at BSL-4 at BU

    Sequenced Reads

    RNA Sequencing

  • Sequencing files

    Bioinformatics pipeline

  • Sequencing files

    Macaque Transcriptome+Tophat

    Aligned Reads

    Bioinformatics pipeline

  • Sequencing files

    Macaque Transcriptome+Tophat

    Aligned Reads

    Raw Counts

    Feature Counts

    Bioinformatics pipeline

  • Sequencing files

    Macaque Transcriptome+

    Normalized Counts

    Trimmed Mean of M-values

    (edgeR)

    Tophat

    Aligned Reads

    Raw Counts

    Feature Counts

    Bioinformatics pipeline

  • Sequencing files

    Macaque Transcriptome+

    Normalized Counts

    Trimmed Mean of M-values

    (edgeR)

    Design Matrix

    +Tophat

    Aligned Reads

    Raw Counts

    Feature Counts

    Bioinformatics pipeline

  • Sequencing files

    Macaque Transcriptome+

    Normalized Counts

    Trimmed Mean of M-values

    (edgeR)

    Design Matrix

    +Fold changes and p-values

    Negative Binomial GLM

    Empirical Bayes (edgeR)

    +

    Tophat

    Aligned Reads

    Raw Counts

    Feature Counts

    Bioinformatics pipeline

  • Fold changes and p-values

    Sequencing files

    Macaque Transcriptome+

    Normalized Counts

    Trimmed Mean of M-values

    (edgeR)

    Design Matrix

    +

    Negative Binomial GLM

    Empirical Bayes (edgeR)

    +

    Tophat

    Aligned Reads

    Raw Counts

    Feature Counts

    Bioinformatics pipeline

  • Days post-infection 0 4 7

    Number of samples 3 3 3

    Clinical symptoms None Fever Severe

    Ebola sequencing dataset

    1000 FFU via intramuscular injection (Barrenas et al., 2015)

  • Days post-infection 0 4 7

    Number of samples 3 3 3

    Clinical symptoms None Fever Severe

    Ebola sequencing dataset

    1000 FFU via intramuscular injection (Barrenas et al., 2015)

  • Days post-infection 0 4 7

    Number of samples 3 3 3

    Clinical symptoms None Fever Severe

    Ebola sequencing dataset

    1000 FFU via intramuscular injection (Barrenas et al., 2015)

  • Days post-infection 0 4 7

    Number of samples 3 3 3

    Clinical symptoms None Fever Severe

    Ebola sequencing dataset

    Ebola (vaccinated) sequencing datasetDays post-infection 0 4 7

    Number of samples 3 3 3

    Clinical symptoms None None None1000 FFU via intramuscular injection (Barrenas et al., 2015)

    1000 FFU via intramuscular injection (Barrenas et al., 2015)

  • GENE

  • GENE

  • GENE

  • What are the gene expression changes that we would expect to see

    during Ebola infection?

  • Interferon acts as an alarm signal warning neighbouring cells about a detected immune threat

    Virus particles

    DNANucleus

    Cell membrane

  • Interferon acts as an alarm signal warning neighbouring cells about a detected immune threat

    Virus particles

    viral RNA

    DNANucleus

    Cell membrane

  • Interferon acts as an alarm signal warning neighbouring cells about a detected immune threat

    Virus particles

    viral RNA

    MDA5/RIG-I

    detection

    DNANucleus

    Cell membrane

  • Interferon acts as an alarm signal warning neighbouring cells about a detected immune threat

    Virus particles

    viral RNA

    MDA5/RIG-I

    detection

    DNANucleus

    PIRF3

    Cell membrane

  • Interferon acts as an alarm signal warning neighbouring cells about a detected immune threat

    Virus particles

    viral RNA

    MDA5/RIG-I

    detection

    DNANucleus

    PIRF3

    P PIRF3 IRF3

    Cell membrane

  • Interferon acts as an alarm signal warning neighbouring cells about a detected immune threat

    Virus particles

    viral RNA

    MDA5/RIG-I

    detection

    DNANucleus

    PIRF3

    P PIRF3 IRF3

    P

    NFKBIKBa

    Cell membrane

  • Interferon acts as an alarm signal warning neighbouring cells about a detected immune threat

    Virus particles

    viral RNA

    MDA5/RIG-I

    detection

    DNANucleus

    PIRF3

    P PIRF3 IRF3 NFKB

    P

    NFKBIKBa

    Cell membrane

  • Interferon Beta

    Interferon acts as an alarm signal warning neighbouring cells about a detected immune threat

    Virus particles

    viral RNA

    MDA5/RIG-I

    detection

    DNANucleus

    PIRF3

    P PIRF3 IRF3 NFKB

    P

    NFKBIKBa

    Cell membrane

  • Interferon Beta

    Interferon acts as an alarm signal warning neighbouring cells about a detected immune threat

    Virus particles

    viral RNA

    MDA5/RIG-I

    detection

    DNANucleus

    Interferon

    PIRF3

    P PIRF3 IRF3 NFKB

    P

    NFKBIKBa

    Cell membrane

  • Nucleus

    Cell membrane

    Interferon

    The production of interferon-stimulated genes is part of the antiviral response

  • Nucleus

    Cell membrane

    InterferonInterferon receptor

    The production of interferon-stimulated genes is part of the antiviral response

  • Nucleus

    Cell membrane

    InterferonInterferon receptor

    The production of interferon-stimulated genes is part of the antiviral response

  • STAT1STAT2

    Nucleus

    Cell membrane

    InterferonInterferon receptor

    The production of interferon-stimulated genes is part of the antiviral response

  • STAT1STAT2

    Nucleus

    Cell membrane

    InterferonInterferon receptor

    The production of interferon-stimulated genes is part of the antiviral response

  • STAT1STAT2

    Interferon-stimulated response element Nucleus

    Cell membrane

    InterferonInterferon receptor

    The production of interferon-stimulated genes is part of the antiviral response

  • Interferon stimulated genes

    STAT1STAT2

    Interferon-stimulated response element Nucleus

    Cell membrane

    InterferonInterferon receptor

    The production of interferon-stimulated genes is part of the antiviral response

  • Interferon stimulated genes

    STAT1STAT2

    Interferon-stimulated response element Nucleus

    Cell membrane

    InterferonInterferon receptor

    MX1IFIT1ISG15

    OAS1HERC5

    The production of interferon-stimulated genes is part of the antiviral response

  • Ebola virus contains a protein that inhibits the production of interferon

    Ebola virions

    viral ssRNA

    MDA5/RIG-I

    sensing

    DNANucleus

    PIRF3

    Interferon Beta

    Interferon

    P PIRF3 IRF3 NFKB

    P

    NFKBIKBa

    Cell membrane

  • Ebola virus contains a protein that inhibits the production of interferon

    Ebola virions

    viral ssRNA

    MDA5/RIG-I

    sensing

    DNANucleus

    PIRF3

    Interferon Beta

    Interferon

    P PIRF3 IRF3 NFKB

    P

    NFKBIKBa

    Cell membrane

    eVP35

  • Ebola virus contains a protein that inhibits the production of interferon

    Ebola virions

    viral ssRNA

    MDA5/RIG-I

    sensing

    DNANucleus

    PIRF3

    P

    NFKBIKBa

    Cell membrane

    eVP35

  • Ebola infection leads to an early increase in the expression of interferon-stimulated genes

  • Interferon-stimulated genes in vaccinated animals dont become highly expressed after infection

  • The majority of genes in vaccinated animals dont change their expression throughout infection

  • A subset of important immune genes becomes highly expressed in vaccinated animals

  • Hypothesis 1: An unknown mechanism allows infected cells to stimulate interferon production

  • Hypothesis 2: Non-productively infected cells can still produce interferon

  • 1000 FFU via intramuscular injection (Barrenas et al., 2015)

    Ebola intramuscular datasetDays post-infection 0 4 7

    Number of samples 3 3 3

    Clinical symptoms None Fever Severe

  • 1000 FFU via intramuscular injection (Barrenas et al., 2015)

    Ebola intramuscular datasetDays post-infection 0 4 7

    Number of samples 3 3 3

    Clinical symptoms None Fever Severe

    Ebola aerosol datasetDays post-infection 0 3 6 8

    Number of samples 4 3 3 2

    Clinical symptoms None Fever Severe Severe1000 PFU via aerosol exposure

  • Different routes of infection lead to comparable immune responses

  • Different routes of infection lead to comparable immune responses

  • Ebola infection leads to an early and strong induction of interferon stimulated genes

    Conclusions from Part I

  • Ebola infection leads to an early and strong induction of interferon stimulated genes

    Circulating immune cells dont show this pattern of activation in vaccinated animals

    Conclusions from Part I

  • Ebola infection leads to an early and strong induction of interferon stimulated genes

    Circulating immune cells dont show this pattern of activation in vaccinated animals

    The route of infection does not appear to cause lasting differences in the immune response

    Conclusions from Part I

  • Part IIDistinguishing between hemorrhagic fevers

    by using the host immune response

    Understanding the host immune response to Ebola virus infection

    Part I

  • Current diagnostic methods require the presence of the virus in the blood

    Time

    Viral Infection

    day 0

  • Current diagnostic methods require the presence of the virus in the blood

    Time

    Viral Infection

    day 0

    Initial symptoms

    day 2-4

  • Current diagnostic methods require the presence of the virus in the blood

    Time

    Viral Infection

    day 0

    Initial symptoms

    day 2-4

    Virus enters the blood (viremia)

    day 4-6

  • Current diagnostic methods require the presence of the virus in the blood

    RT-PCR diagnostic becomes effective

    Time

    Viral Infection

    day 0

    Initial symptoms

    day 2-4

    Virus enters the blood (viremia)

    day 4-6

  • Current diagnostic methods require the presence of the virus in the blood

    RT-PCR diagnostic becomes effective

    Time

    Viral Infection

    day 0

    Initial symptoms

    day 2-4

    Virus enters the blood (viremia)

    day 4-6

    Activated immune response

    No current test

  • Is it possible to distinguish between different infections using the early host immune response?

  • 1000 PFU via aerosol exposure (Caballero et al., 2014)

    Days post-infection 0 3 6 10

    Number of samples 4 4 2 2

    Clinical symptoms None Fever Severe Severe

    Lassa sequencing dataset

  • Marburg sequencing datasetDays post-infection 0 3 5 9

    Number of samples 3 3 3 3

    Clinical symptoms None Fever Severe Severe1000 PFU via aerosol exposure (Caballero et al., 2014)

    1000 PFU via aerosol exposure (Caballero et al., 2014)

    Days post-infection 0 3 6 10

    Number of samples 4 4 2 2

    Clinical symptoms None Fever Severe Severe

    Lassa sequencing dataset

  • Most frequent gene expression patterns

  • Most frequent gene expression patterns

  • Most frequent gene expression patterns

  • Most frequent gene expression patterns

  • Most frequent gene expression patterns

  • Most frequent gene expression patterns

  • Most frequent gene expression patterns

  • Most frequent gene expression patterns

  • Most frequent gene expression patterns

  • Most frequent gene expression patterns

  • Most frequent gene expression patterns

  • Most frequent gene expression patterns

  • Ebola early transcriptional response

  • Common early transcriptional response

  • Fold

    Ch

    ange

    Significance (FDR)

    Lassa

    Fold

    Ch

    ange

    Marburg

    The interferon response is activated as early as 3 days post-infection

    Significance (FDR)

  • Fold

    Ch

    ange

    Significance (FDR)

    Lassa

    Fold

    Ch

    ange

    Marburg

    The interferon response is activated as early as 3 days post-infection

    Significance (FDR)

  • Fold

    Ch

    ange

    Significance (FDR)

    Lassa

    Fold

    Ch

    ange

    Marburg

    Interferon Stimulated

    Other

    The interferon response is activated as early as 3 days post-infection

    Significance (FDR)

  • Fold

    Ch

    ange

    Significance (FDR)

    Lassa

    Fold

    Ch

    ange

    Marburg

    Interferon Stimulated

    Other

    The interferon response is activated as early as 3 days post-infection

    Significance (FDR)

    ISG15OAS1

    MX1

    DHX58

    IFIT2

    HERC5

  • Fold

    Ch

    ange

    Significance (FDR)

    Lassa

    Fold

    Ch

    ange

    Marburg

    Interferon Stimulated

    Other

    The interferon response is activated as early as 3 days post-infection

    Significance (FDR)

    ISG15OAS1

    MX1

    DHX58

    IFIT2

    HERC5 MX1

    ISG15OAS1

    DHX58

    IFIT2

    HERC5

  • Immune markers of infection

  • Immune markers of infection

    MX1 SIGLEC1 SAMD4A HSPA1B HSPA1L MMP8 ADAM28

    0

    10

    100

    gene_name

    Fold

    cha

    nge virus

    lassamarburgebola_k

    Fold

    Ch

    ange

    MX1 SIGLEC1 SAMD4A HSPA1B HSPA1L MMP8 ADAM28

    0

    10

    100

    gene_name

    Fold

    cha

    nge virus

    lassamarburgebola_k

    MX1 SIGLEC1 SAMD4A HSPA1B HSPA1L MMP8 ADAM28

    0

    10

    100

    gene_name

    Fold

    cha

    nge virus

    lassamarburgebola_k

    10

    5

    10

    5

    10

    5

  • 12 Early Samples

    What are the most informative genes?

  • 12 Early Samples Marburg

    Lassa

    Uninfected

    What are the most informative genes?

  • 12 biomarker genes

    MX1 SIGLEC1 SAMD4A HSPA1B HSPA1L MMP8 ADAM28

    0

    10

    100

    gene_nameFo

    ld c

    hang

    e viruslassamarburgebola_k12 Early

    Samples Marburg

    Lassa

    Uninfected

    What are the most informative genes?

  • Can these genes classify blind samples?

    66 Blind Samples

    12 biomarker genes

    MX1 SIGLEC1 SAMD4A HSPA1B HSPA1L MMP8 ADAM28

    0

    10

    100

    gene_nameFo

    ld c

    hang

    e viruslassamarburgebola_k12 Early

    Samples Marburg

    Lassa

    Uninfected

    What are the most informative genes?

  • Can these genes classify blind samples?

    66 Blind Samples

    12 biomarker genes

    MX1 SIGLEC1 SAMD4A HSPA1B HSPA1L MMP8 ADAM28

    0

    10

    100

    gene_nameFo

    ld c

    hang

    e viruslassamarburgebola_k12 Early

    Samples

    12 biomarker genes

    MX1 SIGLEC1 SAMD4A HSPA1B HSPA1L MMP8 ADAM28

    0

    10

    100

    gene_name

    Fold

    cha

    nge virus

    lassamarburgebola_k

    Marburg

    Lassa

    Uninfected

    What are the most informative genes?

  • Can these genes classify blind samples?

    66 Blind Samples

    12 biomarker genes

    MX1 SIGLEC1 SAMD4A HSPA1B HSPA1L MMP8 ADAM28

    0

    10

    100

    gene_nameFo

    ld c

    hang

    e viruslassamarburgebola_k12 Early

    Samples

    12 biomarker genes

    MX1 SIGLEC1 SAMD4A HSPA1B HSPA1L MMP8 ADAM28

    0

    10

    100

    gene_name

    Fold

    cha

    nge virus

    lassamarburgebola_k

    Marburg

    Lassa

    Uninfected

    Marburg

    Lassa

    Uninfected

    What are the most informative genes?

  • Dimension 1 (80.79% Variance)

    Dim

    ensi

    on 2

    (9.

    68%

    Var

    ian

    ce)

    Each dot represents one of the 66 blind samples

    Principal Component Analysis (An instruction manual)

  • Dimension 1 (80.79% Variance)

    Dim

    ensi

    on 2

    (9.

    68%

    Var

    ian

    ce)

    Samples exist in 12-dimensional space (one dimension per gene)

    Each dot represents one of the 66 blind samples

    Principal Component Analysis (An instruction manual)

  • Dimension 1 (80.79% Variance)

    Dim

    ensi

    on 2

    (9.

    68%

    Var

    ian

    ce)

    Samples exist in 12-dimensional space (one dimension per gene)

    Each dot represents one of the 66 blind samples

    PCA rotates the 66 samples in 12-dimensional space and returns the configuration with the clearest clusters

    Principal Component Analysis (An instruction manual)

  • Dimension 1 (80.79% Variance)

    Dim

    ensi

    on 2

    (9.

    68%

    Var

    ian

    ce)

    Samples exist in 12-dimensional space (one dimension per gene)

    Each dot represents one of the 66 blind samples

    I only plot the two dimensions that have the tightest clusters

    PCA rotates the 66 samples in 12-dimensional space and returns the configuration with the clearest clusters

    Principal Component Analysis (An instruction manual)

  • Dimension 1 (80.79% Variance)

    Dim

    ensi

    on 2

    (9.

    68%

    Var

    ian

    ce)

    Samples exist in 12-dimensional space (one dimension per gene)

    Each dot represents one of the 66 blind samples

    I only plot the two dimensions that have the tightest clusters

    PCA rotates the 66 samples in 12-dimensional space and returns the configuration with the clearest clusters

    Principal Component Analysis (An instruction manual)

  • Biomarker genes are useful predictors of infection

    Dimension 1 (80.79% Variance)

    Dim

    ensi

    on 2

    (9.

    68%

    Var

    ian

    ce)

  • Uninfected samples

    Biomarker genes are useful predictors of infection

    Dimension 1 (80.79% Variance)

    Dim

    ensi

    on 2

    (9.

    68%

    Var

    ian

    ce)

  • Marburg-infected samples

    Uninfected samples

    Biomarker genes are useful predictors of infection

    Dimension 1 (80.79% Variance)

    Dim

    ensi

    on 2

    (9.

    68%

    Var

    ian

    ce)

  • Marburg-infected samples

    Lassa-infected samples

    Uninfected samples

    Biomarker genes are useful predictors of infection

    Dimension 1 (80.79% Variance)

    Dim

    ensi

    on 2

    (9.

    68%

    Var

    ian

    ce)

  • Marburg-infected samples

    Lassa-infected samples

    Uninfected samples

    Biomarker genes are useful predictors of infection

    Sequencing samples used to select the 12 biomarkers

    Dimension 1 (80.79% Variance)

    Dim

    ensi

    on 2

    (9.

    68%

    Var

    ian

    ce)

  • Randomly picked genes are not useful predictors of infection

  • Days post-infection 0 3 6 10

    Number of samples 4 4 2 2

    Clinical symptoms None Fever Severe Severe

    Lassa sequencing dataset

    1000 PFU via aerosol exposure

  • Days post-infection 0 3 6 10

    Number of samples 4 4 2 2

    Clinical symptoms None Fever Severe Severe

    Lassa sequencing dataset

    1000 PFU via aerosol exposure

    Independent Lassa microarray datasetDays post-infection 1 4 6 7 10

    Number of samples 3 3 3 3

    Clinical symptoms None None Fever Mild Severe10,000 TCID50 via intramuscular injection (Barrenas et al., 2015)

  • Validation in an independent arenavirus dataset

  • Validation in an independent arenavirus dataset

  • Validation in an independent arenavirus dataset

  • Conclusions from Part II

    Viral hemorrhagic fever infection causes strong transcriptional changes in circulating immune cells

  • Conclusions from Part II

    Viral hemorrhagic fever infection causes strong transcriptional changes in circulating immune cells

    These changes are among the earliest signals of infection that we can detect

  • Conclusions from Part II

    Viral hemorrhagic fever infection causes strong transcriptional changes in circulating immune cells

    These changes are among the earliest signals of infection that we can detect

    A subset of these changes are good discriminators of early stage infections

  • General Conclusions

    Studying the host immune response to infection can provide novel insights into the molecular mechanisms that underlie pathogenesis

  • General Conclusions

    Studying the host immune response to infection can provide novel insights into the molecular mechanisms that underlie pathogenesis

    This approach can facilitate the development of diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines for viral hemorrhagic fevers and other diseases

  • Future directions

    Compare the patterns of macaque PBMC samples with those of human blood samples

  • Future directions

    Compare the patterns of macaque PBMC samples with those of human blood samples

    Understand the proteomic component of the host immune response

  • Future directions

    Expand the analysis to include additional diseases like malaria and dengue fever

    Compare the patterns of macaque PBMC samples with those of human blood samples

    Understand the proteomic component of the host immune response

  • John Connor John Ruedas Erik Carter

    Emily Speranza Kristen Peters

    Jake Awtry Michelle Olsen

    Acknowledgements

  • John Connor John Ruedas Erik Carter

    Emily Speranza Kristen Peters

    Jake Awtry Michelle Olsen

    Ron Corley Tom Kepler

    Evan Johnson Luis Carvalho

    Acknowledgements

  • John Connor John Ruedas Erik Carter

    Emily Speranza Kristen Peters

    Jake Awtry Michelle Olsen

    Ron Corley Tom Kepler

    Evan Johnson Luis Carvalho

    Acknowledgements

    Judy Yen Claire Marie Filone

  • John Connor John Ruedas Erik Carter

    Emily Speranza Kristen Peters

    Jake Awtry Michelle Olsen

    Ron Corley Tom Kepler

    Evan Johnson Luis Carvalho

    Acknowledgements

    Judy Yen Claire Marie Filone

    USAMRIID Anna Honko Arthur Goff Lisa Hensley

    Whitehead Kate Rubins

  • John Connor John Ruedas Erik Carter

    Emily Speranza Kristen Peters

    Jake Awtry Michelle Olsen

    Ron Corley Tom Kepler

    Evan Johnson Luis Carvalho

    Bioinformatics Program Department of Microbiology

    Fulbright Comission Pasteur Institute French Guiana

    Acknowledgements

    Judy Yen Claire Marie Filone

    USAMRIID Anna Honko Arthur Goff Lisa Hensley

    Whitehead Kate Rubins