21
Welcome to the Influence Conference 2013 Nicky Alberry Chairman

Matteo Carrozza, Economic and Fiscal Outlook

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Matteo Carrozza, Economic and Fiscal Outlook

Welcome to the Influence Conference 2013

Nicky AlberryChairman

Page 2: Matteo Carrozza, Economic and Fiscal Outlook

Economic and Fiscal Outlook

March 2013

Matteo CarrozzaSenior Economist

Page 3: Matteo Carrozza, Economic and Fiscal Outlook

3

What to expect in the next 50 minutes:

Economic and fiscal analysis– Growth prospects

– UK fiscal outlook vs. other economies

– Current spending plans

What could be done.– How to analyse proposals (effect on short term, long term, distributional)

– Proposals advanced so far

Q & A, and your proposals

Page 4: Matteo Carrozza, Economic and Fiscal Outlook

4

Sluggish is an understatement…..worse than the 1930s

Source: ONS/BoE

92

93

9495

96

97

98

99

100101

102

103t

t+2

t+4

t+6

t+8

t+10

t+12

t+14

t+16

t+18

UK Economic Output (Index, t = business cycle peak)

2008

1930s

Quarters

Page 5: Matteo Carrozza, Economic and Fiscal Outlook

5

Global outlook bleak, but UK performance disappointing

Page 6: Matteo Carrozza, Economic and Fiscal Outlook

6

Employment is only ‘positive’…

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

t

t+4

t+8

t+12

t+16

t+20

t+24

t+28

t+32

t+36

t+40

t+44

t+48

t+52

t+56

t+60

UK Employment (Business Cycle Peak = 100)

2008

1980

1990

Page 7: Matteo Carrozza, Economic and Fiscal Outlook

7

…but wage growth weak, and productivity low

Page 8: Matteo Carrozza, Economic and Fiscal Outlook

8

UK deficit remains very high…

Page 9: Matteo Carrozza, Economic and Fiscal Outlook

9

…although debt position is considerably better

Page 10: Matteo Carrozza, Economic and Fiscal Outlook

10

…and borrowing costs remain low

Page 11: Matteo Carrozza, Economic and Fiscal Outlook

11

Current plans expect 4 more years of fiscal consolidation

Scale of tightening broadly unchanged over the next two years, pace of tightening starts easing only by 2015/16.

Most of the tightening comes from spending cuts, rather than tax rises

Cumulative tightening, as % of GDP

0123456789

2010–11 2011–12 2012–13 2013–14 2014–15 2015–16 2016–17

Perc

enta

ge o

f nati

onal

inco

me Other current spend

Debt interestBenefitsInvestmentTax increases

Page 12: Matteo Carrozza, Economic and Fiscal Outlook

12

With most of the cuts still to come

% of cuts not implemented by March 2013

58%

17%

67%

33%

59%

77%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

All fiscaltightening

Tax increases Totalspending

cuts

Investmentcuts

Benefit cuts Othercurrent

spendingcuts

% n

ot im

plem

ente

d by

Page 13: Matteo Carrozza, Economic and Fiscal Outlook

13

Time for changing fiscal policy?

Arguments for changes– Growth has been much worse than expected, indicating that perhaps fiscal

tightening ought to be postponed

– Size of the fiscal multiplier may be larger than expected

– Borrowing costs remain low, as long as return on investment is higher than 3%, postponing adjustment may be beneficial in short and long run

Arguments against changes– Danger that changes to fiscal policy result in eventual rise in borrowing

costs, which could be sudden

– Uncertainty with regards to amount of spare capacity, which may be smaller than we think (note: not an argument the OBR/HMT make)

Page 14: Matteo Carrozza, Economic and Fiscal Outlook

14

How to evaluate fiscal policy changes? What is the short run impact? This depends on the fiscal multiplier of

policy change, and generally the higher the propensity to spend the higher the multiplier. i.e. an infrastructure project has generally a higher multiplier than say a tax cut. Some of the windfall of tax cut will be saved, rather than spent. Also, how much is spent domestically?

What is the long run impact? This depends on whether this measure provides positive long term incentives. A policy which for instance encourages more people to work, or invest, would have a beneficial long run effect. With regards to investment, is it a useful investment project, or is it a wasteful project.

What is the distributional effect? Politics, not economics, though distribution is important as it can impact effectiveness of the proposal.

Page 15: Matteo Carrozza, Economic and Fiscal Outlook

15

What changes are scheduled to take place? Departmental spending & benefits

– Further departmental cuts

Taxes– Small increases in personal allowance

– Income tax rate above 150,000 from 50% to 45%

– Freezing of special personal allowance for people older 65, i.e ‘granny tax’

BENEFIT CHANGE

JSA, Employment allowance and other work benefits

Rise limited to 1%

Child benefits Frozen till 2014. Then 1%

Maternity leave Rise limited to 1%

Housing benefits New rules, bedroom tax, + 1% increase

Page 16: Matteo Carrozza, Economic and Fiscal Outlook

16

Should there be higher government investment? Short run effect

– Large multiplier. Very labour intensive, most spent domestically

– ‘Shovel ready’?

Long run effect– Effectiveness would depend on usefulness of investment. Most likely to

have positive long-run effect are investments in transport, energy, and housing. Note: these are the type of projects which generally attract most opposition (HS2, Heathrow expansion, wind farms, etc)

Distributional– Many people benefit from better infrastructure, but there are localised losers

Page 17: Matteo Carrozza, Economic and Fiscal Outlook

17

Should there be tax cuts? Short run effect

– Multiplier depends on propensity to consume it, rather than save it. ‘US-style tax rebates’ would have highest multiplier, changes in tax allowance or VAT cuts less so.

Long run effect– Hard to assess. It partly depends on assessment of spare capacity, and

how deficient demand is

Distributional– Depends on how they are applied

Page 18: Matteo Carrozza, Economic and Fiscal Outlook

18

What Budget proposals have been advanced? CBI

– They propose a fiscally neutral Budget, in which £2.2bn of further cuts in current spend is used to finance extra £1.25bn of investment and £950m in tax cuts.

– Infrastructure investment focused on housing and improved transport. Tax cuts focused on cap on business rates, and freeze of air passenger duty.

– Measures are quite small (£2.2bn), and neutral, so unlikely to have a major impact. Using OBR’s own estimates of multipliers for different policies - which range from 0.3 to 1 – and assuming that proposals deliver most ‘bang for your buck’ the increase in GDP would be negligible.

Others– Various politicians have proposed making further cuts to current spend,

either in welfare or in some specific department, to fund increased investment.

Page 19: Matteo Carrozza, Economic and Fiscal Outlook

19

To conclude Don’t expect much change, with fiscal tightening to continue for until 2016/17,

probably longer Fiscally neutral changes unlikely to deliver much stimulus, especially in the

short term If growth is priority, then extra borrowing to finance infrastructure would deliver

most bang for your buck. See IFS simulations

Page 20: Matteo Carrozza, Economic and Fiscal Outlook

20

Your proposals and Q&A?

Page 21: Matteo Carrozza, Economic and Fiscal Outlook

Thank you

We hope you’ve enjoyed your day.

Keep up to date with Influence at www.influenceswindon.co.uk

and www.twitter.com/SwindonBizVoice

If you would like to receive the Influence Update Bulletin, please leave your business card on your seat.

Thanks to Vox and Business West for their help in organising today.