Upload
profjonathan
View
129
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Jonathan I. Ezor presentation on social media and legal ethics for a CLE of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York on March 14, 2014
Citation preview
Social Media Ethics for
Attorneys
Prof. Jonathan I. Ezor
Touro Law Center for Innovation in Business, Law
and Technology
Counsel, Olshan Frome Wolosky
@ProfJonathan on Twitter
NYC Bar Social Media CLE
March 14, 2014
Electronic
Communications
Crucial for All
Businesspeople
• Multiple channels of electronic business
communication
– Text messages
– Web sites
– Videoconferencing
– Social media
– Others
• Can be one-way, two-way or multipoint
Common Challenges of
Electronic Business Communication
• Addressing and attachment errors
• Lack of nuance & tone
• Heightened expectations of responsiveness
• Informality
• Compliance
• Management
Attorneys’ Ethical
Obligations Add to
Challenges
• Rules of Professional Conduct impact on
attorney communication
• Lawyers must ensure compliance with
those as well as with good business
practices
• Confidentiality biggest potential breach
Newly Added
Model Rule 1.6(c)
A lawyer shall make reasonable efforts
to prevent the inadvertent or
unauthorized disclosure of, or
unauthorized access to, information
relating to the representation of a
client.
Concluding Paragraph from ABA
Technology Proposal
• Technology can increase the quality of legal services,
reduce the cost of legal services to existing clients, and
enable lawyers to represent clients who might not
otherwise have been able to afford those services. Lawyers,
however, need to understand that technology can pose
certain risks to clients’ confidential information and that
reasonable safeguards are ethically required. The
Commission’s proposals are designed to help lawyers
understand these risks so that they can take appropriate
and reasonable measures when taking advantage of
technology’s many benefits….
Investigative Issues
• How are social media being used?
– Information about case?
– Information about opposing counsel? Judge?
– Information about parties? Witnesses? Jurors?
• Front page article in Washington Post (May 29,
2010) about increasing use of subpoenas to
obtain information from social networks:
http://ezor.org/jpsvx
http://ezor.org/czax6
http://ezor.org/8k498
http://ezor.org/am9oh
http://ezor.org/r5k76
http://ezor.org/ry07c
http://ezor.org/fqbq1
http://ezor.org/1eb3w
Evidence Collected in Violation of
Ethics Rules Probably Admissible,
But…
Lying To A Tribunal
• Model Rule 3.3 prohibits attorneys from
making a false statement of fact to a
tribunal
• New connections via social media provide
“channels” for discovery of such
statements
http://ezor.org/5d3h9
Advising Clients on
Social Media Posts
• Ethical issues regarding clients’ social media
posts
• Questions of spoliation, disclosure
• Rules different for civil, criminal matters
http://ezor.org/x8as9
Revised Model Rules
1.18(a) and (b)
(a) A person who consults with a lawyer about the
possibility of forming a client-lawyer relationship with
respect to a matter is a prospective client.
(b) Even when no client-lawyer relationship ensues, a
lawyer who has learned information from a prospective
client shall not use or reveal that information, except
as Rule 1.9 would permit with respect to information of
a former client.
NYSBA Ethics Opinion 899
http://ezor.org/hsg1y
“Specialties”
NYSBA Ethics Opinion 972
http://ezor.org/mwj05
CONCLUSION
6. A law firm may not list its services under the heading
“Specialties” on a social media site. A lawyer may not list
services under that heading unless the lawyer is certified in
conformity with the provisions of Rule 7.4(c).
Recommendations
• LinkedIn allows parties to “recommend” the work of
a another participant. Issues?
• What about asking a client to recommend your
work?
• Any other risks in posting information about your
matters?
Recommendations
• Be mindful of rules that place limitations on the
use and content of testimonials
• Model Rule 4.1 (duty of candor) prohibits the
making of a false statement of material fact to a
third person
– Beware of possible exaggerations regarding your
biography, experience, etc.
• What about asking a judge to recommend you?
• What about announcing on Twitter, Facebook or
LinkedIn that you just won a big jury trial or
negotiated a big deal?
Recommendations
• Depending on the rules in your
jurisdiction, this could require you to add
a disclaimer along the lines of “results will
vary in each case” or similar language
• A related issue, depending on the content
of your blogs or tweets
– Could they be governed by your state’s
restrictions on lawyer advertising?
– If so, what are your obligations?
http://ezor.org/qnt43