OPEN SOURCEAn origin story to freedom..

Content

History

How we share knowledge over the years

The two families

The definition of the two main currents in free software and open source software

Open topics

List of some open topics that are now in real live available.

OPEN SOURCEThe origin of open source

Sharing knowledge is of all times

History timeline Open & Closed software

1960 Open Academics and corporate researchers working in collaboration, often shared as public domain software.

1970 Open & Closed Rise of commercial software.

1980 Closed Dominance of commercial software.

1990 Open & Closed Knowledge sharing via internet and development of global conscience/village.

2000 Open Sharing as fuel for adoption and evolution.

2010 Open Innovation and evolution make open mandatory.

1950 Open1900 Free patent sharing between car manufactures after court ruling.

1709

British Statute of Anne gave publishers copyrights.

1465 -1474

Invention of printing press in Itally, the Netherlands and England.

250 Years after invention of print, copyright was invented

Free patent sharing between Car manufacturesSharing knowledge is seen as mandatory to achieve greatness (1911-1945+)

1911 - Ford wins court case against Selden on engine Patent / Monopoly

Open Source Hardware at ELECTUUR MAGAZINFree and open electronica schematics to share, use and improve distributed in a magazin

Open Source Hardware at the OLD TV SET RCA CT-100Service manual included the schematics of the electronics you buy - you always fix!

In the 1950s and into the 1960s almost all software was produced by academics and corporate researchers working in collaboration, often shared as public domain software. As such, it was generally

distributed under the principles of openness and co-operation long established in the fields of academia, and was not seen as a commodity in itself.

Open Source Software at the Universities

An IBM mainframe operating system, Airline Control Program (ACP), from 1967 was also distributed with source code included. User groups such as that of the IBM 701, called SHARE, and that of Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC), called DECUS were formed to facilitate the exchange of software.

"SHARE is not an acronym; it's what we do.”

Open Source Software as Standard

The rise and fall of Microfsoft, (IBM) and Apple

Commercial influences grew in the software market (1967+)

The rise and fall of Microfsoft, (IBM) and Apple

Commercial influences grew in the software market

Software was shared via the airwave around 1980

Global distribution of software and easy global communication leads to creation of FSF/GNU (1983) and OSI (1998( to counter close source software practices.

Software Computer now a day exhibit privacy abuse, lock-in by companies and are there to share knowledge

Software Computer now a day exhibit privacy abuse, lock-in by companies and are there to share knowledge

1953 A-2 system UNIVAC - first open source software

Brief overview of important moments

1967 Airline Control Program (IBM) - open source community

1969 US DOJ wins court case against IBM on selling hardware with software

1976 Bill Gates sends the “Open letter to Hobbyists” against sharing software

1983 GNU founded by Richard Stallman

1998 OSI founded by Eric Raymond and Bruce Perens

1911 Ford wins court case against Selden on engine Patent / Monopoly

https://www.flickr.com/photos/opensourcewayhttp://www.slideshare.net/EMCCODE/open-source-is-good-for-both-business-and-humanity-dockercon-2016

OPEN SOURCEThe two families

The two families vs closed source

Free Software Foundation Open Source Initiative

“In 1983, Richard Stallman published the GNU Manifesto and launched the GNU Project to write a complete operating system free from constraints on use of its source code. ”

“The organization was founded in February 1998 by Bruce Perens and Eric S. Raymond, part of a group inspired by the Netscape Communications Corporation...”

The two families

Free Software Foundation Open Source Initiative

“For the Open Source movement, non-free software is a suboptimal solution. For the Free Software movement, non-free software is a social problem and free software is the solution.”

“dump the moralizing and confrontational attitude that had been associated with 'free software' in the past and sell the idea strictly on the same pragmatic, business-case grounds that had motivated Netscape.”

The two families talk about each other

1. The freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose .

2. The freedom to study how the program works, and change it so it does your computing as you wish.

3. The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor.

4. The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others.

1. Free Redistribution2. Source Code Availability3. Derived Works Permitted 4. Integrity of Author’s Source Code5. No Discrimination Against Persons or

Groups6. No Discrimination against Fields of

Endeavor7. Same Distribution License8. License not Specific to a Product9. License Must Not Restrict Other Software

10. License Must be Technology Neutral

The two families and their own definition of open

By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to benefit from your changes. Access to the source code is a precondition for this.

A closer look:Free Software Foundation

Written in 1997 by Eric S. Raymond in 1998 OSI founded by Eric Raymond and Bruce Perens

Gothfather of Free Software FoundationGNU Project in 1983, GNU Manifesto in 1985

Gothfather of the Open Source Initiaive

Free Software FoundationWhy freedom is important

Free Software FoundationDefinition of freedom

Free Software FoundationFreedoms explained

A closer look:Open Source Initiative

Open Source InitiativeThe cathedral and bazaar explained explained

Open Source InitiativeThe cathedral and bazaar need different hierarchie

Open Source InitiativeSharing ideas is increases per person the nett sum of ideas

A closer look:Free Software Foundationvs Open Source Initiative

Free Software Foundation Open Source Initiative

Free SpeechSoftware FreedomDemocraty

Free MarketsOpen Source SoftwareCapatilism

The two families a challenging analysis

“Whether community is important or not is dependant on: your business model (Open Source), and/or your ethics (Free Software)”

Your business model (Open Source), and/or your ethics (Free Software)

Define:● How you interact with client.● What type of people should be

part of the team.

This all defines:● your culture, ● your working space, ● your way of cooperation.

and that defines: Your business model (Open Source), and/or your ethics (Free Software) etc

It is all connected

Hackers and painters by Paul Graham

Free Software Foundation Open Source Initiative

Free SpeechSoftware FreedomDemocraty

Free MarketsOpen Source SoftwareCapatilism

The two families - where do you stand?

IRL Examples of Free and Open Source Software

InteroperabilityRedistributableCustomizableSharableCollaborativePortabilityFree License

Open Source Software

This should be in the box

Open Design

Open Design & Manufacturing Open Software Open Licensing

Open Education Open Knowledge

Open Hardware

Maker Movement

Open Source Initiative

Free Software Foundation

Science Commons

Creative Commons

ICommons

Open Courseware

Open Edu Resources

Open Science

Open Access

Open Archives

Open Content

Open Data

Open Food

Open Government

Open Mainframe

Open Streetmap

Open Business (Models)

Open Money

Open Media

Open Standards

…. many more ….