37
Social Network Analysis (SNA) and its implications for knowledge discovery in Informal Networks Dr. Jai Ganesh Web 2.0 Research Lab

Social Network Analysis (SNA) and its implications for knowledge discovery in Informal Networks

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Social Network Analysis (SNA) and its implications for knowledge discovery in Informal Networks- Talk by Dr Jai Ganesh, SETLabs, Infosys at Search and Social Platforms tutorial, as part of Compute 2009, ACM Bangalore

Citation preview

Social Network Analysis (SNA) and its implications for knowledge discovery in Informal Networks

Dr. Jai GaneshWeb 2.0 Research Lab

2 2

Overview

• Social Networks

• Social Network Analysis (SNA)

• SNA in Web 2.0 scenarios

• Why Invest in SNA

• Examples

– Example 1: Customer Service Operation

– Example 2: Organisational Network Analysis

– Example 3: Criminal Investigation

• Analysing Data

– Tools and Products

• Issues

• Conclusion

Overview of Web 2.0

4 4

Web 2.0: Overview

• Web 2.0 is about harnessing the potential of the Internet

– In a more collaborative and peer-to-peer manner

– Users communicate and collaborate while at the same time contribute and participate

– Is shaping the way you work and interact with information on the web

– Mindset change towards collaborative participation

– Shifts the focus to the user of the information

– User can search, choose, consume and modify the relevant content

Web 2.0 refers to the adoption of open technologies and architectural frameworks to

facilitate participative computing

Principles of Web 2.0

6 6

Web 2.0 principles

Social Networks

8 8

Social Network

• A social network is structure made of nodes (representing people or organizations)

– that are connected together by one or more interdependencies (representing values, ideas,

friendship, financial exchange, or trade)

• Represented as a social graph–based structure often very complex

• A web of trust exists in every social network

– nodes represent members of the web and edges represent the amount of trust among pairs

of acquaintances

• Rapid emergence and acceptance of online social networks

– Computer Mediated Social Spaces (LinkedIn, Orkut, Facebook, SecondLife, Myspace)

– Peer to Peer Networks (Bit Torrent, Napster, KaZaA, Fasttrack, Freenet)

– Agent based systems (Cite-U-Like)

– Online transactions (Amazon, eBay)

9 9

Sample Social Network

Social Network Analysis (SNA) and Web 2.0

1111

Multitude of networks

University networks

ProfessionalNetworks

ResearchNetworks

Product -based Networks

State-wise Networks

Language Networks

GamingNetworksStudent

Networks

Supplier/BuyerNetworks

Lifestyle NetworksEntrepreneurship

networks

Software developer networks

FamilyNetworks

PoliticalNetworks

1212

Dimensions of Social Network formation

Dimensions Scenarios1 Space Physical, Virtual

2 Time Persistent, Campaign based

3 Theme Healthcare, Home, Gaming

4 Product/Commerce Wii, iPhone

5 Demographics State, Income, Race, Language

6 Life Cycle Teens, Adults, Middle Aged, Elderly

7 Customer Profile Single Parent, Single Professional, Separated professional, Retired Professional

9 Software/Tool based PC configurator, Mashups, Widgets

10 Enterprise Small Businesses, Mom & Pop stores

11 Entities Universities, Governments, Research Labs

Social Network Analysis

1414

Social/Organizational Network Analysis

• Social Network Analysis (SNA) relates to mapping, understanding,

analyzing and measuring interactions across a network of people

– Social networks, both formal as well as informal can foster knowledge sharing

among participants

– This has interesting implications on enterprises wanting to leverage social

networks to draw insights and inferences on user preferences as well as user

participation in networks

– Using SNA, analysts can explore questions related to social networks such as

• Who are the members to watch?

• What are they saying?

• Where do they interact?

• Strength of interactions?

• Emergence of sub-groups?

• ----------

1515

Social/Organizational Network Analysis

• Social Network Analysis (SNA) is the mapping and measuring of

relationships and flows between people (Borgatti et al 2002)

• Organizational Network Analysis (ONA) applies SNA to interactions in an

organizational setting

• Focus on the persons involved

– i.e., the WHO question

SNA and Web 2.0

1717

Key Question

• How do you derive value from Web 2.0 assets?– Direct

• Better Customer/Consumer Experience

• Leading to

– Increased Customer Base

– Increased Sales

– Less Direct• DATA from Web 2.0 assets as an ASSET

– Derived

• Better understanding of the customer

• Learning from the customer

– Customer driven innovation

– Examples: E-bay, Amazon

1818

SNA and Web 2.0

• Peer-to peer

– Peer-to peer network wherein collaboration and sharing are important activities

– Self managed collaboration as opposed to a central node-managed collaboration

– Wikis, blogs, video sharing etc.

• Collective Intelligence

– Lays emphasis on the large scale distributed Intelligence of the participants in

the network over central Intelligence

– User created, modified, updated content

– User tagging, reviews etc.

1919

Amazon Recommendations

• Keeps track of browsing history, past purchases, your ratings as well as

purchase by other users

• Include four types of ‘personalized’ recommendations– Social recommendation (What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?)

– Item recommendation (New for You)

– Package recommendation (Frequently Bought Together)

– ‘Others like you’ recommendation (Customers who bought …. also bought)

• Extensive customer reviews which include– 1- 5 star ratings

– Favorable vs. Critical reviews

– Detailed review comments

– Your rating of the review comments (Help other customers find the most helpful reviews )

– Comments on the review themselves

Why invest in SNA

2121

Why invest in SNA

• User/customer generated information could provide key insights

which will aid decision making

• Insights into new products/services

• Informal listening board

• Influence customer decision making

• Social computing becoming popular

• Increasing role of communities

Analysing Data

2323

What is the data required?

• Online Individual Identity

– Assumptions

• Real identity may be unavailable

• Contact channel is available

• Multiple personalities/avatars

possible

– Peer Evaluations

• Rating or “Respect” measures

• Message Data

– Sender

– Recipient (individual, group or online

location)

– Content is text (for now…)

• Message threads more valuable

– Ability to relate one message to another

– Chronology of messages

• Online conversations

– Captured as log files

• Defined User Roles

– Enable online community to create user

roles

– Map identity to user roles

• Uniform Time Stamps

– Chronology of all actions in the

community

2424

Why focus on the individual?

• Analyze past history of inputs

– Internal measure(s) of quality

– Community perspective(s) of quality

• Watch more closely their future inputs

– Presuming that

• Highly respected or individuals with high quality levels will provide higher

quality inputs or insights in future

• Interact directly with those individuals

– Make them part of the “internal” team

• Understand interactions between individuals in the network

2525

How to go about understanding the data?

• Unit of analysis

– “Message”

• Content sent from an

individual sender to a

recipient (individual or group)

– Message threads

• Identify concepts

– Categorizing messages

– Relate concepts and

individuals

• Identify individuals related to

concepts

– User Role

– User Status

• Links between individuals

– Sub-groups

• Links between concepts

– Locations on the network

2626

How to go about understanding the data? Contd…

• Link concept to source of the concept

• Determine reliability of

– Concept

– Source of the concept

– Through peer evaluation

• Discover issues of interest to the community

– As opposed to asking what we think is interesting

• Dynamic Analysis

– What has changed since the last time we looked?

2727

Tools and Products: Diagramming and Analysis

• Online Tools/Products– BuddyGraph/Social Network

Fragments (Experimental tool)

– Visible Path (Email)

– Metasight KMS (Email)

– ActiveNet/Illumio (Email +

Documents)

– ContentExchange

(Classification of user

generated content)

• Traditional SNA Tools– UCINet 6

– MOST + SNA

– Pajek (Diagramming tool)

• Others– CustomerConversation

– ZoomInfo

2828

Other Techniques

• Collaborative Filtering

– Recommendation Engines

• Text mining

– Identify concepts and key words

• Web usage mining

– Usage patterns

– Identify what an individual is reading

• Process Mining

– Identify what sequence of activities take place

Interpreting the results and acting on it

3030

Effective Use of the Network

• 4 dimensions for effective use of a network (Cross, Parker and

Borgatti, 2002)

– Knowledge

• Knowing what someone knows

– Access

• Gaining timely access to that person

– Engagement

• Creating viable knowledge through cognitive engagement

– Safety

• Learning from a safe relationship

3131

Application Areas

• Customer Facing (External)

– “Customer Intelligent Enterprise”

• Employee Facing (Internal)

– Break down internal silos

– Increase points of contact

• Hybrid (Customers and Employees)

– Facilitate interaction

– Direct connection to customers with insight and ideas

3232

Processes and Avenues

• Create/provide online venues for interaction

• Identify key network members

• Proactive contact with key members

• Facilitate interaction

– Connect key members to internal units

– Seed conversations (?)

• Facilitate listening/learning

– Feedback vs. listening

Issues to consider

3434

What about...

• Data Sources

– Ownership

– Access

• Boundaries

– Of the firm

– Of the network

• Privacy and Other Legal

Constraints

– Global network

– Local restrictions

• Processing Data

– Pre-processing Bias

– Formatting and storing Data

• Questions:

– When do I know I have

something interesting?

– When do I know that

something is no longer

interesting?

Conclusion

3636

Conclusion

• Web 2.0 environments

– Rich source of data

• Huge potential to tap the insights of the consumer base

• Organizational Network Analysis

– Focus on the Individual/Community

– Identify likely sources of interesting data

– Watch for what they say in future

• Application Areas: Listening to

– Consumers

– Employees

Thank You

[email protected]