37
Bits of Energy Daniele Miorandi daniele.miorandi@{create-net.org,u-hopper.com}

Bits of energy

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Bits of Energy

Daniele Miorandi

daniele.miorandi@{create-net.org,u-hopper.com}

House rules

2

My task

3

● Lead scientist at CREATE-NET○ 120+ publications○ h-index 24○ 6+M€ competitive

R&D funding○ 4 patents pending

About myself

● EVP R&D @ U-Hopper○ Big data services for

retail & marketing ■ RetailerIN (http://www.

retailerin.com/)■ Tapoi (http://www.tapoi.

me/)○ Recently landed in SV

4

Bits of what??

● Smart energy systems● Privacy and security issues● Business opportunities and showstoppers

5

“Houston, we have a problem”

6

Market??

$2B7

CAGR???

● Market analysis firms predict a CAGR in the range from 9.6% to 29.7%○ Depending on the assumption on evolution of

regulatory frameworks● Faster growth in China/APAC

8

Ok, now let’s go back to the tech...

Smart grid?

9

Energy + ICT = Smart Grid

10

Smart grid● Supports two-way energy flow● Ubiquitous sensing + real-time control & actuation

○ Optimized energy flow○ Demand-response mechanisms (adapt demand to

generation)● Value-added services

○ Personalised tariffs, energy consumption visualization, remote control of appliances etc.

● Data, data, data (100s PB/yr)11

12

Why smart grids?

● From traditional power grids to smart energy systems○ Policy○ Technology○ Business

13

Policy driver

● Global warming & Kyoto protocol○ Push to energy efficiency & low-carbon

■ “Waste less energy in the grid”■ “Use more from wind & sun”

○ (Big!) push to renewable energy systems■ Small-scale, distributed

● vs. old large-scale, centralized■ Intermittent, unpredictable

● vs. old fully controlled

14

Tech driver

● Sensors and actuators○ Something better than electromechanical switches??○ E.g., PMU

● Data processing○ Cloud, big data etc.etc.

● High-speed nets○ Open networks??

15

(break)

16

Business driver

● Energy markets getting liberalized & open○ vs. old state-owned monopoly

■ (modulo transmission - natural monopoly)○ business pressure to achieve higher efficiency and

to offer new services/tariffs

17

So what does that mean?

● From a centralized, closed and strictly controlled system..

● ..To a distributed, open eco-system● Heavy role of ICT as enabling technology● Potential usage of ‘open’ networks (aka the

Internet + cloud)

18

Caveat● Some folks believe ‘smart grid is like the

Internet for energy’○ That’s damn wrong

● Energy storage is technically challenging and veeery expensive○ So what flows in must flow out○ Very different from storing bits! (~free)

● Energy transmission is costly as well!○ Consume where produce, Produce where consume

19

Security and privacy: why?● A critical infrastructure moving from a closed system to

an open one○ Prone to attacks ○ Cybersecurity issues

● From an energy-centric monopoly to a data-driven business landscape○ Data security issues

● Detailed energy consumption issues available through smart meters○ Privacy aspects (personal data!) 20

#1: Cybersecurity

● Connect a critical infrastructure to the Internet = opening Pandora’s box

21

Cybersec (cont’d)● From 2011 to 2014, the U.S. Department of

Energy received 362 reports from electric utilities of physical or cyber attacks that interrupted power services○ Most frequent one? Shooting substation

transformers (no jokes)● 30% growth y/y● What about the unknown ones?

○ Orders of magnitude more 22

Cybersec (cont’d)

● Key weak point: SCADA○ Stuxnet++

● What to do?○ Airgap does not help!

23

Cybersec (cont’d)

● What to do○ Intrusion detection systems○ Strong authentication/authorization○ DDoS remedies + anomaly detection○ Source address validation (?!)

● More in general: design for robustness and resilience at the system level○ There is no 100% secure asset

24

Cybersec (cont’d)

● Is crypto the solution?● Need new design paradigms at the system

level○ look at complex systems stuff

25

#2: Data security

● Energy data has business value○ Integrity○ Authenticity○ Confidentiality○ (tamper-proof devices, ok)

● Pretty standard stuff from an ICT perspective○ Yet new for energy folks!

26

Data security (cont’d)

● Energy companies reluctant to move data to the cloud (!)○ That will end rather soon

● Any solution for creating trusted cloud environments can have a good impact○ Honest-but-curious provider

■ Data obfuscation, homomorphic encryption etc.etc.

27

#3: Privacy

● Detailed consumption data is personal information○ At least in EU

● Detailed?○ 15’ granularity (standard for smart meter)

28

Privacy (cont’d)

● Why personal?○ You see a spike at 3am every night in my house.

What does that mean?

29

Privacy (cont’d)

● Yet, detailed consumption information has value○ Billing

■ dynamic ToU, real-time spot pricing○ Operations

■ Flow balance○ Value added services

■ Visualization, behavioural energy efficiency etc.etc.

30

Privacy (cont’d)

● Privacy-by-design approach○ for collection (informed consent, minimality principle

etc.etc.), processing (k-anonymity, differential privacy etc.etc.), profiling (access management, auditing)

31

Looks like..

● A rather large, fast-growing market● In need of security and privacy-preserving

tech● No rocket science required

32

33

The evil side of smart grids

● Energy is a regulation-driven market● Companies do not invest if not strictly

required to do so○ Little competitiveness push to innovation

● Conservative mindset● Traditionally hunting field for big fishes (sap,

oracle, ibm etc.etc.)34

The good news

● Regulatory push is coming● US market already developing● Good exit opportunities

35

36