Ccs project network update

Philip Ringrose, Project Network Steering Committee

Global CCS Institute Europe Member Meeting

Bergen, 8th May 2012

| 2 | | |

Contents

1. The Projects

2. The Network

| 3 | | |

1) The Projects

| 4 | | |

A strong portfolio

Don Valley,

UK Power sector 650 MW, pre-

combustion 5 Mtpa CO2

Compostilla, ES Power sector 323MW,

oxyfuel

1.6 Mtpa CO2

Porto Tolle, IT Power sector 250MW, post-

combustion

1 Mtpa CO2

Jänschwalde,

DE Power sector

300MW,

post-combustion & oxyfuel

1.7Mtpa CO2

Bełchatów, PL Power sector

250MW,

post-combustion 1.8Mtpa CO2

ROAD, NL

Power sector

250MW, post-

combustion

1.1 Mtpa CO2

Sleipner, NO Gas processing

1Mtpa CO2

| 5 | | |

Bełchatów

Project developer: PGE Partners: Alstom, Dow Chemical,

PGI, Gazoprojekt, Schlumberger.

Capture 260MWe post-combustion.

Lignite.

Transport 60-140km pipeline.

Storage Deep saline aquifer.

Onshore.

1.8 MtCO2/yr.

| 6 | | |

Update Bełchatów

Comprehensive FEED study completed.

Capture Ready status for new-build 858 MWe Power Plant

obtained.

Storage site selection completed.

Feasibility study for transport completed.

Ongoing public engagement campaign.

| 7 | | |

Compostilla

Project developer: Endesa Partners: CIUDEN, Foster Wheeler.

Capture 330MWe oxy-combustion.

Transport 150km pipeline.


Onshore.

1.6 MtCO2/yr.

| 8 | | |

Update Compostilla

Regulation on transport and plant operation not in place (no level

playing field in the market).

- Capture: Technology Development Plant in advanced

stage of construction.

- Transport: Pipeline design concluded.

- Storage: - Preliminary characterization of subsurface

structures well advanced.

- Technology Development Plant fully

operational in 2013.

- Action plan for public engagement.

Major challenges are non-technical (finance, regulatory and

public perception).

| 9 | | |

Don Valley

Project developer: 2CO Energy

Capture 650 MWe pre-combustion.

Transport 175 + 175 km pipeline.

Storage EOR, depleted gas reservoirs or

deep saline formation.

Offshore.

5 MtCO2/yr.

| 10 | | |

Update Don Valley

Project owned by 2Co, and Samsung C&T recently agreed to

take a strategic 15% stake in the project.

Scope of the project broadened (includes EOR).

National Grid’s initial public consultation complete, with a

preferred onshore route recently announced

| 11 | | |

Jänschwalde

Project developer: Vattenfall

Investment: €1.5bn (€1.2bn for capture)

Capture 250MWe post-combustion.

50MWe oxy-combustion.

η=36% (38%).

Flexible operation (50-103%).

97% availability targeted. Lignite.

Transport 50-100km pipeline.

Storage Deep saline aquifer (or gas field).

Onshore.

1.7 MtCO2/yr.

| 12 | | |

Update Jänschwalde

Due to the ongoing impasse in the German CCS law, Vattenfall

has decided to halt plans for its CCS demonstration project in

Jänschwalde.

Unfortunately the project will also be leaving the Network in the

coming month.

Lessons learnt from this project will be shared with the other

Network members at the Network knowledge sharing even on the

24-25th of May.

| 13 | | |

Porto Tolle

Project developer: ENEL

Capture 264MWe (net) post-combustion.

Construction permit for new 2GW power plant

issued Jan 2011 (η =45%).

Retrofit of one 660MW unit.



20km offshore.

~1 MtCO2/yr.

| 14 | | |

Update Porto Tolle

Pilot in Brindisi has run over 2.400 hrs (promising results in the

energy consumption).

Problems with permit base power plan (conversion oil to coal)

have been solved.

Transposition of EU Directive accomplished.

- Transport: - Application for permits ground surveys

submitted.

- Injection: - Feasibility studies for subsurface structure

and injection system.

- FEED for platform and well(s).

- Storage: - Ongoing modelling of storage site and

engineering of exploration drilling.

- Application for exploration permit ongoing.

| 15 | | |

ROAD, Rotterdam

Project developer: Maasvlakte CCS Project Partners: E.ON Benelux, GdF Suez

Capture 250MWe (net) post-combustion.

Power plant η=46%

(with capture plant η=36% (designed)).

Baseload. 90% capture.


Storage Depleted gas reservoirs.

Offshore.

1.1 MtCO2/yr.

| 16 | | |

Update ROAD

Design of capture plant is complete

Draft permits (environmental/spatial) are about to be published.

Storage permit has been successfully reviewed by the

Commission, which has given its first Opinion

Flow assurance study has been completed

Storage facility negotiations are progressing well

FID Q2, 2012

| 17 | | |

Sleipner

Project developer: Statoil Partners: ExxonMobil, Total

Capture In operation since October 1996.

Gas processing

Conventional amine capture. Transport

1km delivery pipe.


Offshore.

0.9 Mtpa CO2 stored.

Over 13 Mt CO2

injected to date.

| 18 | | |

Update Sleipner

18 The Sleipner CO2 story

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Accu

mu

late

d in

jecte

d C

O2

[mil

lio

n to

ns]

Year

2D

Wellhead pressure stable at ~ 64 – 65 bar

Wellhead temperature set at 25 oC

CO2 injection history Geophysical

monitoring

surveys

| 19 | | |

2) The Network

| 20 | | |

What is the CCS Project Network?

Established in 2009 to generate early benefit from a coordinated

European action on CCS-demonstration projects

Current members includes the seven projects; however Jänschwalde

will unfortunately be leaving the Network until the project is restarted

Projects fulfilling qualification criteria can join

Objectives

Enabling knowledge-sharing amongst projects

Leverage experience of projects in order to gain public confidence

about CCS

Promote CCS, EU leadership and cooperation potential to third

parties/countries

| 21 | | |

Network update – change of secretariat

New secretariat for the Network effective 21 March 2012.

The new secretariat consists of:

The Global CCS Institute is a not-for-profit independent entity. It’s global members include 350 government, industry, academia bodies. It focuses on knowledge sharing and assisting projects

IFPEN is a public-sector research, industrial innovation and training centre active in the

fields of energy, transport and the environment.

TNO applies scientific knowledge with the aim of strengthening the innovative power of industry and government.

SINTEF is one of the largest independent European research institutes, focusing on power generation and energy conversion technologies, distribution and end-use.

| 22 | | |

How do we operate?

Structure

Members, bound by Membership Agreement and Knowledge Sharing Protocol.

Steering Committee provides leadership.

Advisory Forum provides guidance.

Wide outreach to stakeholders and dissemination of data and findings.

Activities

Regular knowledge sharing events, reporting & dissemination.

Knowledge reporting form twice-yearly.

Website and Intranet.

International links.

Engagement with forums such as ZEP.

| 23 | | |

What have we done?

Thematic webinars April/May 2012.

Working sessions in Oslo and Hamburg (2010) and Rotterdam (2011).

Knowledge sharing event in Porto Tolle, Compostilla and Lódz (2011).

Advisory Forum-meetings in Brussels in 2010 and 2011.

Four themes have been focussed on in 2010 and 2011.

Public Engagement.

Risk Management (2010).

Permitting.

Storage (2011).

and Lessons learned reports have been published on the 2010 and 2011

themes.

| 24 | | |

What will we do?

A deeper and more focused approach to knowledge sharing:

Collecting data and sharing them in-line with the Protocol.

Reviewing the current system for data collection and sharing.

Greater and clearer dissemination of findings

More focused topics to be developed in 2012:

Public Engagement

Regulatory Development

Storage (monitoring, characterisation)

Development of “new” tools such as webinars and methods for fast-

bilateral exchange.

| 25 | | |

What are our challenges going forward?

The real challenge is in progress of the projects themselves!

If the projects are in a good shape, the Network is in a good shape.

Some projects on the verge of important decisions.

Main hurdles:

Project finance

Time

Public and political support for storage

Extrinsic threats

| 26 | | |

Conclusions

The Network is in a good shape.

We need to go deeper into knowledge sharing

(vs. exchange of lessons learned “only”).

The real challenges lie in the progress of the projects themselves and

the hurdles which seem to remain unchanged whilst time goes on

(a generally felt concern).