19
CPWF Highlights Learning how to conduct integrated R4D Alain Vidal, Director Larry Harrington, Research Director

CPWF Overview March 2011

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Overview of the CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food. With a number of examples including one from the Andes on Benefit Sharing Mechanisms.

Citation preview

Page 1: CPWF Overview March 2011

CPWF HighlightsLearning how to conduct integrated R4D

Alain Vidal, DirectorLarry Harrington, Research Director

Page 2: CPWF Overview March 2011

Global food crisis: a poverty “countdown”3 billion poor below US$2.5/day2 billion suffer from malnutrition1 billion suffer from hunger 75% of them are rural poor Alleviating hunger means reducing

rural poverty

Reducing rural poverty Increase the income of the rural poor to

enable food security and investment into productivity Ensure they can cope with short-term and

long-term changes

Page 3: CPWF Overview March 2011

The resilience challengeFood production communities and ecosystems should be able to cope with local and global changes (climate, economy, demography, migrations…), ie become more resilient Achieved through improved water

productivity (more food with less water) together with empowerment, equity, market access, health and ecosystemservices

3

Page 4: CPWF Overview March 2011

CPWF aims to increase the resilience of social and ecological systems through better water management for food production

Through its broad partnerships, it conducts research that leads to impact on the poor and to policy change

4

Page 5: CPWF Overview March 2011

CPWF Basins in phases 1 and 2

2

1

Page 6: CPWF Overview March 2011

Lessons learnt from Phase 1

Restoring ecosystem services in the Andes

Page 7: CPWF Overview March 2011

Downstream – where the concern for ecosystem services emerged

Eutrophication and shrinking of

Fuquene Lake (downstream)

High altitude wetland (paramo)

degraded by potato cropping and overgrazing

Page 8: CPWF Overview March 2011

Restoring upstream and downstream ecosystem services

8

Paramo restored through

conservation tillage and oat/potato

rotation

Water quality and downstream ecosystem services from Fuquene

Lake improved

Page 9: CPWF Overview March 2011

Understanding resulting changes on upstream water

9

T re a tme n t 1 T re a tme n t 2

1 2

H o rizo n

36

38

40

42

44

46

48

50

52

54

56

58

60

% v

olum

etri

c w

ater

Conservation agriculture

Traditional agriculture

% V

olum

etric

Wat

erMore water stored, restoring the buffer

role of paramo

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

1 2 3 4

Size fraction

AO

M (

g/g

)

RT-Horizon 1 CT-Horizon 1 RT-Horizon 2 CT-Horizon 2

Conservation agriculture

Traditional agriculture

Accu

mul

ated

Org

anic

M

atter

(g/g

)

Better soil porosity, filtration, increased

carbon storage

Page 10: CPWF Overview March 2011

Understanding triggers for change between alternate resilient states

10

S

Annual net income:US$ 2,183/ha

Annual net income:US$ 1,870/ha

Conservation agriculture and paramo restoration supported by revolving fund

Farmers‘ insufficient gain and risk aversion: only 11% converted

Revolving fund credit: +180 farmers /year

Potato cropping, grazing pressure, degradation of paramo

Page 11: CPWF Overview March 2011

CPWF Phase 2(2009-2014)

What it takes to do problem-solving and integrated research for development in 6 river basins

Page 12: CPWF Overview March 2011

Focusing the CPWF strategyFocus on priority “basin development challenges” or BDCs in specific parts of six basins

Use all scientific tools needed to address the challenge, emphasizing those with the greatest potential for development impact within the 15 year CPWF time frame

Investment in each BDC research program: USD 5-6m distributed across 4-5 strongly inter-linked projects

Further integration into CRP5

12

Page 13: CPWF Overview March 2011

Six basin development challenges (highly abbreviated versions)

Andes – Benefit-sharing mechanismsGanges – Floods and salt in the DeltaLimpopo – Small reservoirs, rainwater and livelihoodsMekong – Dams and livelihoodsNile – Rainwater management in EthiopiaVolta – Small reservoirs, rainwater and livelihoods

Page 14: CPWF Overview March 2011

BDC research programsCoherent strategy focused on problem-solvingIntegration of policy, institutional, governance, access, and technical innovations Spatial targeting of innovations Cross-scale analysis of downstream consequences, including for ecosystem servicesEngagement with senior policymaker, other stakeholders, communications, gender, capacity-buildingFunctional links among projects (output from one project used as input by another project)

14

Page 15: CPWF Overview March 2011

An example of a BDC research program– the Ganges – the challenge

Water, water everywhere, all year round, but farm families barely subsist on a single low-yield rainy season rice crop per year . . . Because of water scarcity

Post-rainy season water outside of polders becomes too saline

15

Page 16: CPWF Overview March 2011

An example of a BDC research program– the Ganges – the vision

Store more fresh season water within polders

Use for high value post-rainy season crops and aquaculture

Change in sluice gate management to let water in when it is fresh, but keep it out when it is saline

16

Page 17: CPWF Overview March 2011

An example of a BDC research program– the Ganges - projects

Water governance: who gets how much water, when, and for what purposes – and who gets to decide (sluice gate management)

On-farm water management: getting the most value out of scarce stored fresh water

Spatial targeting, which strategies for which polders

External consequences and global drivers, downstream consequences of success, likely effects of global drivers

Coordination and change: policy engagement, communications, CB, impact pathways

17

Page 18: CPWF Overview March 2011

An example of a BDC research program– the Ganges – partners (incomplete list)

18

Water governance IWMI, BIRD, Socio-Consult, BWRB

On-farm water management IRRI, WordFish, BRAC, BRRI, BFRI, CSSRI, CIRA

Spatial targeting, IRRI, Soil Resource Development Institute, Local Government Engineering Department

External consequences and global drivers,

IWM, BUET, BWRD, IWMI

Coordination and change: WorldFish, IRRI

Red font = national partner (NGO, GO, university)

Page 19: CPWF Overview March 2011

Thank [email protected]

www.waterandfood.org