Upload
chris-mavergames
View
771
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation given at the 3rd Croatian Cochrane SymposiumSchool of Medicine, University of SplitSplit, Croatia2 April 2011
Citation preview
Collaborating online: Web 2.0 and beyond
Chris MavergamesWeb Operations Manager/Information Architect
The Cochrane Collaboration
Croatian Symposium
Split, 2 April 2011
Poll
How many of you use/have heard of the following?
Social networking: Facebook, LinkedIn Microblogging: Twitter Social bookmarking: CiteULike, del.icio.us,
Connotea Blogs, Wikis: medical and librarian blogs,
Medpedia; Blogger, Wordpress, pbwiki (services) Subscription services: RSS for anything
Cutting through the jargon
What was Web 1.0? Static pages, one-way interaction Searching instead of finding Passive approach to web pages – pages essentially
online documents Hyperlinks, email lists One-size-fits-all content
cochrane.org
Cutting through the jargon
What is different in Web 2.0? Dynamic pages, participatory interactions Information comes to you (push vs. pull) Customization of content, saved searches (iGoogle, “My
NCBI“ at Pubmed) More finding (or receiving), less searching Interactive pages: commenting, subscribing, posting, adding,
sharing, etc. All about the content (the technology gets simpler!) –
“Internet as platform“
igoogle.com
Some Web 2.0 applications and tools
Social networking: Facebook, LinkedIn Microblogging: Twitter Social bookmarking: CiteULike, del.icio.us,
Connotea Blogs, Wikis: medical and librarian blogs,
Medpedia; Blogger, Wordpress, pbwiki (services) Subscription services: RSS for
– Podcasts– News– Saved searches
More on Web 2.0
Push vs. Pull– Web 2.0 allows you to have information “pushed“ at you vs.
you having to “pull“ it
Finding vs. searching Via RSS, Twitterfeeds, Group updates, etc. Web 2.0 keywords: interact, share, collaborate, remix Internet as a platform (less downloading of software,
more use of online services)
Web 2.0 analogies and concepts
An analogy: – Web 1.0 = static on a radio– Web 2.0 = provides a tuner
“tuning the web“ “joining the conversation, already in progress“ Information can be very rich (C. Shirky - flickr
pages as technical manuals, “hdr“ example)
Social Networking services
Facebook, LinkedIn, 2Collab, and others These services allow you to create an online
profile so that you can interact with others:– Join groups that share your interests – Share links, notes, reading lists, videos, etc.– Comment on and discuss items shared by others– Use chat and messaging services
linkedin.com
2collab.com
Why use these tools?
Networking with like-minded individuals in your field
Enhancing your productivity by learning from and sharing with others
Exploring new interests or research topics Career and professional development Don‘t underestimate the power of these tools!
Microblogging - Twitter
Share short, 140-character messages (“tweets“)
You follow people and they follow you Filtering tools for Twitter allow filtering of
keywords of interest to you What is he talking about? Much easier to show
you!
twitter.com/cochranecollab
tweetdeck.com
Lists on Twitter
Insert more recent shot!!!
Why Twitter?
Concept of “ambient awareness“, perfect example of ‚push‘ technology You won‘t see every tweet, but you‘ll be ‚ambiently‘ aware of the
conversation Tweet a question, get an answer! Share and find links to interesting sites Search Google for “twitter apps“ Get Twitter on your mobile device What‘s coming (hopefully) that will improve:
– Grouping of “friends”– Text links in tweets– Allow tweeting to a group– Etc.
Social Bookmarking
del.icio.us, CiteULike, Connotea Allow users to share collections of links User-generated tagging Like a giant bookmarks database CiteULike and Connotea are specifically for
scholarly references
citeulike.org
del.icio.us
Why use social bookmarking?
Discover new, relevant articles and websites New links come to you via RSS or your account on
these services Access your bookmarks anywhere, from any browser Export citations easily (CiteULike) and organize your
scholarly papers For traditional library setting: reference librarian can
share their bookmarks easily with patrons
Blogs, Wikis
Blog (weblog): example – Laika‘s MedLiblog Wiki (What I Know Is)
(backronym - The word wiki, halved from the Hawaiian phrase "wiki wiki" meaning "quick „)
– Collaborative resource creation– Takes advantage of the “hive“ of people on the web all with
specific knowledge– Medpedia– Fun example: twictionary
Blogger, Wordpress, etc. (tools for creating blogs) Pbwiki.com, wetpaint.com, etc. (tools for creating wikis)
http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/
http://scienceroll.com/
Insert more recent shot!!!
http://www.medpedia.com/
http://ccreview.wikispaces.com/
http://mavergames.org
Why use blogs?
Among many reasons... Good summary of interesting articles in a particular field Can receive updates via RSS (‚push‘) Starting a blog allows you to network with other bloggers
and “guest post“ on other blogs Can serve as a homepage for your research work And many other reasons...
Did you know? If your Cochrane Group uses the central system for it‘s website, blogging is an option? Ask me for details!
Why use wikis?
Among many reasons... Very powerful knowledge gathering tool Allows for collaborative work environments Can use them for “crowd sourcing“ your work
or for brainstorming ideas Utilizing the “hive mind“ to gather ideas, facts
Subscription services: RSS
You can obtain the following and much more via an RSS feed (Really Simple Syndication)
– Podcasts– Saved searches– News feeds– Updates to sites, collections of bookmarks, flickr
photos, etc. – could be anything!
Google Reader, Yahoo, Bloglines, etc.
cochrane.org/podcasts
cochrane.org/rss-feeds
My iGoogle page
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/myncbi/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/myncbi/
bmj.com/rss
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/besttreatments
http://www.webicina.com/rss_feeds/
http://www.webicina.com/rss_feeds/
Typical Web 2.0 scenario
I visit Laikas MedLiblog:
Where I find this post:
Typical Web 2.0 scenario
I visit the site:
I subscribe to the feed:
Typical Web 2.0 scenario
I decide to tweet it:
I get this response via Twitter:
Typical Web 2.0 scenario
So, I visit the Facebook group and join. Then, I post the following to the group page:
And so on...
Further reading
Visit del.icio.us/mavergames for a complete list of links from this presentation (see tag “EAHIL”)
Follow The Cochrane Collaboration on Twitter! twitter.com/cochranecollab
Follow me on Twitter! twitter.com/mavergames Get news via RSS from cochrane.org/rss-feeds In a few days, see slidecast of this presentation at
slideshare.net/mavergames Share, collaborate, remix, explore!
Questions?
Hvala!
Chris MavergamesWeb Operations Manager/Information Architect
The Cochrane Collaboration
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: mavergames
Blog: mavergames.net