28
SME2 Meeting Friday 18 th May Learning Methodology

Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

SME2 MeetingFriday 18th MayLearning Methodology

Page 2: Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

SME2

Methodology

“SME 2.0 consortium will establish online training for European Small and Medium Enterprises based on the

transferred methodology from SMELearning LdV project (smelearning.eu ), with strong focus on the special

characteristics and needs of the SMEs.”

Page 3: Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

SME2

Methodology

Page 4: Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

• Methodology for SME trainings based on SME1 model – developed o + Personal Research - developed

• Needs analysis - based on survey results – to be carried out by us based on survey results

• Elaborated SME 2 competency framework – based on both of the above – somewhat developed

SME2

Methodology

Page 5: Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

• WP2: – Conceptual framework

• Taxonomy – updated– Evaluation of the set up

• Questionnaires• Guide for evaluating the problems, etc for defining methods

– Competice models• WP3A:

– Information on innovative training– Innovation in training for SMEs– The type of ICT used in training – NEEDS TO BE UPDATED– How to overcome barriers to the introduction into business of new

training methods based on the ICT– Responses to ongoing questions on the use of ICT in training– How to remove obstacles linked to the implementation of

innovative training?• WP3B:

– The situation of SMEs– Implementing ICT models/ Competice description sheets

SME2

Methodology

Page 6: Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

SME2

Methodology

3 Main factors for consideration with training for SMEs:

Page 7: Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

Information for SMEs1. SMEs & training

• Information on innovative training• Innovation in training for SMEs

2. Conceptual framework and taxonomy for SME training

SME Learning Methodology3. Evaluating & monitoring a SME for training

• Evaluation of the training setup• Questionnaires for evaluating training• Guide for evaluating the problems, etc for defining methods

4. Competice models for training• Competice models

• Implementing ICT models

5. Training Practices for SMEs• Item 1 (SME2 Module?)• Item 2 (SME2 Module?)• Item 3 (SME2 Module?)• Item 4 (SME2 Module?)

6. Strategic recommendations for e-learning for SMEs• How to overcome barriers to the introduction into business of new training methods based on the ICT• Responses to ongoing questions on the use of ICT in training• How to remove obstacles linked to the implementation of innovative training?

SME2

Methodology

Page 8: Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

Information 1 - SMEs & Training• Information on innovative training• Innovation in training for SMEs

SME2

Methodology

Page 9: Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

Information 2- Conceptual framework and taxonomy for SME training

SME2

Methodology

Page 10: Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

Step 1 - Evaluating & monitoring a SME for training• Evaluation of the training setup - Plan-Do-Check-Act” (PDCA)• Questionnaires for evaluating training• Guide for evaluating the problems, etc for defining methods

SME2

Methodology

Page 11: Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

SME2

Methodology

ENVIRONMENT

CultureChampions

CommunicationsChange

Page 12: Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

• Vs the “4C’s”1. The total lack of training culture within the SME2. Lack of appropriate learning materials3. The attitude of individual managers4. Lack of access to sufficient bandwidth to ensure

high quality training.

* Study carried out by Cedefop and the European Commission

SME2

Methodology

Page 13: Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

• Identify Real Learning Needs:– Very important point – especially for the

development of the content – information here will be based on needs analysis.

• Adapting instruction works:– Means' work supports the thoughtful adaptation

of instructional methods and materials to the online environment

SME2

Methodology

Page 14: Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

Step 2 - Competice models for training• Competice models• Implementing ICT models

SME2

Methodology

Page 15: Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

• Blending works :– Growing consensus around the conclusion that

the most effective type of instruction combines the online and face-to-face environments

• Self-directed online learning is not the best :– Collaborative or instructor-directed online learning

achieved results superior to those attained through independent, self-directed online learning

SME2

Methodology

Page 16: Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

• Rather than 1 style for all, similar to SME1 - offer different models with different levels of contact and let the SME decide (and/ or suggestions from partners) what model is most suitable for them depending on availablity, etc.

* According to 1 Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning. Center for Technology in Learning, U.S. Department of Education

* Backed up by Other meta-analyses which reach this conclusion are Bernard et. al (2004) and Zhao et. al (2005).

SME2

Methodology

Page 17: Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

SME2

Methodology

Step 2 – Reduced Competice models for training

Page 18: Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

Step 3 – Deliver training for SMEs• Deliver training and training practices toSMEs

SME2

Methodology

Page 19: Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

Step 4 - Strategic recommendations for e-learning for SMEs• How to overcome barriers to the introduction into business of new training methods based

on the ICT• Responses to ongoing questions on the use of ICT in training• How to remove obstacles linked to the implementation of innovative training?

SME2

Methodology

Page 20: Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

• Methodology for SME trainings based on SME1 model – developed o + Personal Research - developed

• Needs analysis - based on survey results – to be carried out by us based on survey results

• Elaboration of SME 2 competency framework – based on both of the above – somewhat developed

SME2

Methodology

Page 21: Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

Step 3 – Deliver training for SMEs• Deliver training and training practices toSMEs

SME2

Methodology

Page 22: Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

• Closely linked to SME2 Course information

• Connection/ Fidelity to Tengen training?

• Training platform decided?

• Focus of results analysis?• Training use of tools or

theoretical information?

SME2

Methodology

Page 23: Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

Suggestions:

1) Focus on small, micro-chunks of material, easily accessible, available as part of the larger course, but also available as stand-alone learning objects for a specific tool/ piece of knowledge – in turn develops course structure

SME2

Methodology

Page 24: Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

Suggestions:

2) “Social media based on Web 2.0 services i.e. media for social interaction offer the premises for a fast knowledge acquisition and support transforming learning in a continuous „life long process” also within the communities.”

* I Hamburg, FH-Gelsenkirchen, Germany (2010)

SME2

Methodology

Page 25: Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

Suggestions:

3) Focus on use of screencasting/ video/ conferencing for provision of content. “SME’s tend to avoid anything that will not grab attention immediately” * – e.g.: Text-heavy training

*Bean C, Accidental Instructional Designer, 2012

SME2

Methodology

Page 26: Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

Suggestions:

4) Integrate learning as part of ongoing processes or even projects with a view to a deliverable at the end (SME could develop internal process as part of this exercise)

“Supporting learners’ communication includes assisting students in coping with the technology, providing multiple means of access, helping students to achieve text based communication skills, setting personal goals and priorities and dealing with conflict and tension.” - * I Hamburg, FH-Gelsenkirchen, Germany (2010)

SME2

Methodology

Page 27: Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

Suggestions:

5) Provide template for video/ screencast material to provide consistency and develop a focus for informing SME learners.

Suggested Items:• Introduction• Learning Objectives• Learning Objective 1• Learning Objective 2• Learning Objective 3• Key Points• Self-Assessment (Maybe a separate entity?)• Activity/ Applying Content (Could potentially be part of the LOs)

SME2

Methodology

Page 28: Darragh Coakley: From SMELearning towards SME 2.0

Thanks for your attention

Questions/ Comments?