Evolution of System Architectures: Where Do We Need to Fail Next?

® © 2013 Open Geospatial Consortium OGC

® ®

Evolution of System Architectures: Where Do We Need to Fail Next?

Luis Bermudez, Nadine Alameh, and George Percivall

April 10, 2013 EGU General Assembly 2013 - ESSI2.5

Vienna, Austria


Innovation

I have not failed, I’ve just found 10,000 ways that won’t work. Thomas Edison


Innovation about what?

3


Innovations about sharing geospatial data

4

Web Map Service

Web Coverage

Service

Web Feature Service

Sensor Observation Service

?


Who are the modern Edisons?


OGC Process based on consensus

"Never get angry. Never make a threat. Reason with people."

Don Vito Corleone (The Godfather)


Proven process

•  39 published standards •  41 sucesfull interoperability program intitiatives since 1999 •  740 implementing products in the market

7


Proven process

8


Evolution of Technologies

2003 2013

A story of OGC Web Services (OWS) Testbeds


What was going on before 2003

•  1997 - OpenGIS Simple Features 1.0 •  2000 - Web Map Service 1.0 •  2002 - Web Feature Service 1.0 •  2002 - Catalog Services Specification (1.1.1) •  2003 - Web Coverage Service •  2003 - OGC Reference Model 0.1.3 was published

® © 2013 Open Geospatial Consortium OGC 11


OWS 1 (2003)

12

Broker

ProviderRequestor

1. Publish2. Find

3. Bind

Provider

4. Chain

OGC General Service Model (GSM)


OWS 1 (2003)

13

Map Viewer Client

WMS WFS WCS

Catalog Service

Imagery Client

Discovery Client

Sensor Collection

Client

Data Type Registry

Service Type

Registry

Sensor Type

Registry

Coord. Transf. Service

Imagery Generator

Web Viewer Generator

Sensor Collection

Service

Client Services

Server Side Client Applications

Application Services

Data Services

Registries


OWS 2 (2004)

•  SOAP/WSDL implementations of WMS, WFS, WCS, CS-W •  UDDI Registry •  UML to XML tool (UGAS) – Automation !

– Application profiles NGA and USGS

•  Image Handling and Decision Support – WCS 1.0 Server and Client

14


OWS 3 (2005)

15

•  Sensor Web Enablement •  GeoDRM (Digital Rights Management) •  Common Architecture •  Gespatial Decision Support •  Open Location Services


OWS 3 (2005) - GeoDRM

16

OWS Client

Terms Client

User

WWW

Proxy

Proxy

Negotiate Terms

Do Request With Terms

View/accept Terms

Do Request

Issue/verify Terms

Do Request

OWS Services

DRM Enabled

OWS Service

DRM Service

Enhanced Client Enhanced Service

Provider(s)


Web Map Server

Aerial Imagery Telemetered to Web Coverage

Server

Web Feature Server

OLS Tracking Service

Command/Control Center

Sensor Service

OWS 3 (2006) – Real Time Decision Support ERT Deployment


OWS 4 (2007)

•  Sensor Web Enablement (SWE) •  Geo Processing Workflow (GPW) •  Geo-Decision Support (GeoDSS) •  Geo-Digital Rights Management (GeoDRM) •  UML to GML Schema •  CAD / GIS / BIM (CGB) •  OGC Location Services (OpenLS) •  Compliance Testing (CITE)

18


OWS 4 (2007) – CityGML + BIM

19


OWS 4 (2007) – Specialized Services

20


OWS 4 (2007) - Videos for Demonstrations

21


OWS 5 (2008)

•  Sensor Web Enablement •  KML in WMS •  Agile SLD to KML •  UML to GML Schema •  Workflow Architecture and Conflation •  SOA Worflow for Sensor data (IEEE 1451)

22


OWS 5 (2008) - Agile KML

23

Styled Layer Descriptor SLD

© 2008, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc.

GoogleEarth Client

Feature Portrayal Service (FPS)

GetMap

GML

GML

GML

KML

HTML

WFS AML 2.1 and DAFIF 7 data on Oracle Spatial

Galdos Cartalinea

WFS Population data on PostGIS

TOPP GeoServer

WFS VMAP0 data on ArcSDE

Galdos Cartalinea

WRS AML, DAFIF and FACC Feature Data Dictionaries

Galdos Indicio

GetRecord

GetFeature

GetFeature

GetFeature


OWS 5 - Geoprocessing Workflow Architecture

24


OWS 5 (2008) – SOA for Sensor Data

25


OWS 6 (2009)

•  Aeronautical Information Management (AIM) •  Sensor Web Enablement (SWE) •  Geo Processing Workflow (GPW) •  Decision Support Services (DSS) •  Compliance Testing (CITE)

26


OWS 7 (2010)

•  More domain focus: e.g. Aviation •  Sensor and Decision Fusion •  Sensor Fusion Enablement

27


OWS 7 (2010) Aviation

28

® © 2013 Open Geospatial Consortium OGC 29 Access Tier

WXXM 1.1 WF AIXM 5.1 WFS

Business Process Tier

Client Tier

Other Client Applications

Request

Portrayal

Subscribe to Events

Request data or

updates to data

R

equest data For portrayal O

r validation

Post Events U

pdate data

AIXM 5.1 WFS –T WXXM 1.1 WFS

SWIM

Snowflake

AIXM 5.1 WFS -T

Comsoft

4D Weather Cube WFS/WCS

& WFS Pub/Sub

NNEW & MIT LL

Volcanic Ash WXXM 1.1

WFS

Meteo France

Registry

Galdos

AIXM Portrayal

Envitia

WXXM Portrayal

Alticode & Envitia

Event Alert

52 North

iGSI; UM-IfGI; Galdos

AIXM Handling Tools

LISAsoft

WXXM Client

Atmosphere

Flight Dispatch

Luciad & Frequentis

EFB/Handheld

Luciad & Frequentis Planet 9

GMU, Luciad

Receive

Events


OWS 8 (2011)

•  More domain focus: e.g. Aviation •  Brokering, Mediation •  Observation Fusion (Coverages and Mobile Tracking) •  Geosynchronization and bulk data transfer

30

® © 2013 Open Geospatial Consortium OGC 31

Access Tier

Business Process

Tier

Client Tier


OWS 9 (2012)

•  More domain focus : e.g. Aviation •  Brokering, Mediation, Conflation, Security •  Mobile •  New Formats: OWS Context, GeoPackage

32


OWS 9 (2012) – OWS Context

OGC

WPS Service

GML

<href> <href> <href> <embbed>

<href>

<href> <href>

Geopackage

Open Platform independent

SQLite Spatialite Rasterlite


Summary

35

OWS 1 (2003)

OWS 9 (2012)

SOA

Conflation & Semantics

Conflation Digital Rights

Security

UML to XML

CAT BIM

OWS 6 (2009)

Aviation

Sensor Web

Sensor Fusion Observation Fusion

GeoPackage OWS COntext

Mobile


What’s next

36


OWS 10 (2013)

•  January 2013: Call for sponsors/1st Sponsor Meeting •  January-April: 2013 Concept development •  June 2013: RFQ (responses due in July) •  September 2013: Kickoff meeting •  March 2014: Demonstrations and final deliverables

http://www.opengeospatial.org/projects/initiatives/ows-10

37


Cloud and BIG Data

38


More Advance Conflation and Semantics

39


Augmented Reality

40


Internet of Things

41


Privacy

42


Questions?

43

Luis Bermudez, Ph.D. [email protected]

@berdez on Twi<er h<p://www.linkedin.com/in/bermudez

You are cordially invited to become the Geo Edisons of the future

Technology

Evolution of System Architectures: Where Do We Need to Fail Next?