Upload
farming-futures
View
794
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
This presentation formed part of the Farming Futures event 'Carbon & Farming - Putting Science into Practice'.29th July 2010
Citation preview
Why does your carbon footprint matter?
Graham Wilkinson
Arla Foods
4 August 2010
Why does your carbon footprint matter?
Retailer
Processor
Consumer
Farm
SUSTAINABILITY
Companies moving forward
Consumers following in their
footsteps
1 in 8 – companies should be
penalised for no action
79%“Companies should be penalised for
failing to care for the environment”
penalised for no action
84%“Manufacturers have either stepped up
their investment in sustainability or kept it
the same during the recession”
76%“Suppliers think that sustainability
will play a great role in their trading
relations”
Source:Future Foundation, 2009; IGD, 2010
Shoppers were asked what they feel
they can positively influence
Source: IGD, 2009
Carbon labelling is becoming more
prominent on packaging
CO2
Carbon labelling & the consumer
27%Heard &
know what it
means
21%Not heard
When prompted –
understanding of carbon
labelling among
consumers is strong
52%Heard but
unsure what
it means
When it comes to the phrase ’carbon
labelling’ which of your following statements
comes closest to your view?
68% identified correct
definition, rising to 72% in
those concerned about
the environment
Source Pepsico/Populus
Sustainable wood, LED lighting and a combined heat and power
plant powered with renewable fuel. � no net carbon footprint and
exports back any extra electricity generated to the national grid
Opens First Zero Carbon Supermarket
We'll be a zero carbon business by
£100m+ spend on green technology: Electric Car charging points,
CO2 refrigeration and combined heat and power plants that
generate green electricity
We'll be a zero carbon business by
2050 but only by working with our
suppliers and others across the
industry
Retailer aims
Become a zero carbon business by 2050
Desire to become carbon neutral
Cut 30% absolute carbon by 2020 vs 2005 base
Cut Co2 emmisions by 25% by 2012 vs 2005/6 base
80% reduction by 2050 (34% by 2020)
“Our objective is to develop our business on a foundation of long -term perspectives with respect for, and in harmony with, our surroundings.”
-Peder Tuborgh
“Arla's key principle is "Closer to Nature" and therefore Climate Change and reducing
carbon are fundamental to our business.”
- Peter Lauritzen
Arla CUK: where are we now
Our carbon footprint
Farm
Logistics
3%
Packaging
4%
Operations
3%
Operations
Logistics
30%
Farm
90%
Operations
36%
Packaging
34%
CUK Environmental strategy
• To achieve emissions targets which meet or exceed Climate Change and key Voluntary Agreements, while allowing Arla and our farmers to remain competitive.
• 34% reduction in CO2 emissions by 2020
• Renewable energy : 30% by 2020
• Water: 20% reduction by 2015
• Waste: Zero to landfill by 2012• Waste: Zero to landfill by 2012
• Meet Courtauld 2 targets: (10% carbon reduction by 2012)
• Meet Milk Roadmap Targets: 10% (2012) – 30% (2015) - 50% (2020) recycled plastic in fresh milk bottles
• To form strategic partnerships with Customers and Suppliers.• To work consistently, proactively and collaboratively enabling
Arla to meet and exceed strategic Customer Expectations.
Arla CUK achievements to date
•• 2005 to 2009 (despite increased production volumes):2005 to 2009 (despite increased production volumes):
•• 9.6% overall CO2 reduction9.6% overall CO2 reduction
•• 14.3% reduction CO2 from our dairies14.3% reduction CO2 from our dairies
•• 13.6% CO2 reduction from our packaging13.6% CO2 reduction from our packaging•• 13.6% CO2 reduction from our packaging13.6% CO2 reduction from our packaging
•• 11% water savings11% water savings
•• 53% less waste to landfill 53% less waste to landfill -- Settle site (UHT & Butter) zero waste Settle site (UHT & Butter) zero waste
to landfill achievedto landfill achieved
•• Courtauld 2 signatoryCourtauld 2 signatory
•• Active involvement in many groups/initiatives:Active involvement in many groups/initiatives:
•• WRAP, Dairy UK, NISP, FTA Carbon ReductionWRAP, Dairy UK, NISP, FTA Carbon Reduction
Legislation and media pressure
’The agricultural sector is a substantial emitter of greenhouse
gases, but it has the potential to be a big part of the solution
to global warming as well’ – Climate and farming.org
Current retailer/AFMP work on farm
• Tesco funding methane trials on TSDG farms:
’By changing the way we farm we can get quick reductions in the carbon footprint on your milk bottle’ – Dr Rob Smith
’I look forward to seeing how we can use the results with our dairy farmers and the wider dairy industry’ – Emma Jones
• Asda:• Asda:
• 60 carbon trust approved assessments on farm – ongoing work
• Health and culling monitor completed by supplying Asda farms
• On farm workshops covering welfare subjects – improved health =
generally improved carbon footprint
• Morrisons:
• Renewables report with University of Newcastle
Financial benefits
Financial efficiency Bottom 25% Average Top 25%
Cost of production (ppl) 28.9 28.7 25.4
Carbon footprint (CO2g/litre) 1,275 1,039 834
Carbon footprint as a % of the
average
122 100 80
AFMP environmental work
• Heat exchange units installed on several farms –
secured discounts through Fabdec and Mueller
• Renewable energy assessments completed on a
number of farms
• 2008 environmental survey completed - another • 2008 environmental survey completed - another
potentially in the pipeline
• Pilot project on vari-speed vacuum pumps
• Working with NFU on nutrient management planning
– Tried and Tested
• Promote case studies and best practice in publications
Why does your carbon footprint matter?
ConsumerRetailerProcessorFarm
• The consumer wants it – they buy the product
• The retailer wants it – we need a home for our milk
• Processors need to prove competitive advantage to retailers
• It makes financial sense to the whole chain and we need to work
together (LCA)
• We need to be proactive – if we don’t take action we will be told
• We need to ensure we are in a position to defend our industry from
any negative critisism