Upload
charles-mok
View
1.615
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Government ICT Procurement Policy Industry Survey -- May 5 2008
Citation preview
Government Government ICT Procurement Policy ForumICT Procurement Policy Forum
Charles MOKEx-officio Member
Hong Kong Information Technology Federation5 May 2008
Industry SurveyIndustry Survey
The SurveyThe Survey
Co-organized by CAHK, HKCS, HKITF, WTIA, ISIA and SCK Office
Conducted from May-August 2007 Target: contractors/subcontractors with
experience in Government ICT projects 31 completed questionnaires collected
Project Background Project Background InformationInformation
Industry Survey
Value and types of contractValue and types of contract
Va lu e o f co n tra c t
N o . o f re s p o n d e n ts : 29
>HKD$ 1 0 m illio n2 1 %
HKD$ 1 .3 - 1 0 m illio n3 1 %
HKD$ 1 .3 m illio n≦4 8 %
Op e n Te n d e r
6 1 %
S OA- QPS2 6 %
ITP S A13%
Typ e s o f c o n tra c t
N o . o f re s p o n d e n ts : 31
Technical demonstrationTechnical demonstration
*Question only available to contracts required technical demonstration
3 %
2 3 %
3 4 %
7 %
3 3 % Tim e p ro vid e d fo r p re p a rin g te c h n ic a l d e m o n s tra tio n
Le s s th a n 1 w e e k
1 - 2 w e e ks
2 w e e ks - 1 m o n th
1 - 3 m o n th s
De m o n s tra tio n n o t re q u ire d
N o . o f re s p o n d e n ts : 30
1 5 % 3 0 % 4 0 % 1 5 %
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Do yo u a g re e th a t s u ffic ie n t t im e w a s p ro vid e d to yo u fo r p re p a rin g te c h n ic a l d e m o n s tra t io n ? *
S tro n g ly Dis a g re e Dis a g re e N e u tra l A g re e S tro n g ly A g re e N o Co m m e n t
N o . o f re s p o n d e n ts : 20
Contractor's liabilityContractor's liability
Ye s4 4 %
N o5 6 %
Wa s th e c o n tra c to r's lia b ility lim ite d ?
N o . o f re s p o n d e n ts : 27
5 0 %
4 2 %
8 %
Typ e s o f lia b ility b e in g lim ite d
In d ire ct o r co n s e q u e n tia l d a m a g e s to th e G o v 'tTo ta l lia b ility e xce p t th ird p a rty p e rs o n a l lo s s a n d d a m a g e s to in te lle ctu a l p ro p e rtyOth e rs
N o . o f re s p o n d e n ts : 12
Out-of-scope tasksOut-of-scope tasks
50% respondents were assigned with out-of-scope tasks (n=30)
*Question only available to contracts required technical demonstration
Co n tra cto r in itia te d o f fe r
2 0 %
Co s t a b s o rb e d b y ve n d o r
1 3 %
Oth e rs7 %
Re m u n e ra tio n a rra n g e m e n t fo r o u t-o f- s c o p e ta s ks *
N o . o f re s p o n d e n ts : 1 5
A cco rd in g to m a rke t p re v a ilin g ra te
4 0 %
G o v e rn m e n t in itia te d o f fe r7 %
Ba s e d o n ra te s p e cif ie d o n co n tra ct
1 3 %
Out-of-scope tasksOut-of-scope tasks
1 3 % 1 6 % 4 2 % 6 % 2 3 %
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Do yo u a g re e th a t th e re m u n e ra tio n a c c e p ta b le ?
S tro n g ly Dis a g re e Dis a g re e N e u tra l A g re e S tro n g ly A g re e N o Co m m e n t
N o . o f re s p o n d e n ts : 31
Profit marginProfit margin
2 9 % 4 2 % 2 9 %
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Do yo u a g re e th a t th e p ro fit m a rg in o f Go ve rn m e n t c o n tra c ts m a tc h e d s im ila r c o n tra c ts in th e p riva te s e c to r?
S tro n g ly Dis a g re e Dis a g re e N e u tra l A g re e S tro n g ly A g re e N o Co m m e n t
N o . o f re s p o n d e n ts : 31
General Comments on General Comments on Government ICT ProjectsGovernment ICT Projects
Industry survey
InnovativenessInnovativeness
1 6 % 2 3 % 3 2 % 2 9 %
0% 1 0% 20% 30% 40 % 50% 60 % 70% 80 % 90% 1 00%
Do yo u a g re e th a t s u ffic ie n t e m p h a s is is p la c e d o n b id d e rs ' in n o va tive n e s s fo r S OA -QPS co n tra c ts ?
S tro n g ly Dis a g re e Dis a g re e N e u tra l Ag re e S tro n g ly A g re e N o Co m m e n t
N o . o f re s p o n d e n ts : 31
1 3 % 3 5 % 3 2 % 6 % 1 3 %
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Do yo u a g re e th a t s u ffic ie n t e m p h a s is is p la c e d o n b id d e rs ' in n o va t ive n e s s fo r o p e n te n d e r c o n tra c ts ?
S tro n g ly Dis a g re e Dis a g re e N e u tra l A g re e S tro n g ly A g re e N o Co m m e n t
N o . o f re s p o n d e n ts : 31
Technical competencyTechnical competency
1 0 % 3 2 % 2 6 % 1 6 % 6 % 1 0 %
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Do yo u a g re e th a t s u ffic ie n t e m p h a s is is p la c e d o n b id d e rs ' te c h n ic a l c o m p e te n c y fo r o p e n te n d e r c o n tra c ts ?
S tro n g ly Dis a g re e Dis a g re e N e u tra l A g re e S tro n g ly A g re e N o Co m m e n t
N o . o f re s p o n d e n ts : 31
Current liability regime…Current liability regime…
3 %
2 3 %
6 %
1 9 %
6 %
2 9 %
3 5 %
4 5 %
3 9 %
2 6 %
3 5 %
1 0 %
2 6 %
3 5 %
2 9 %
2 9 %
3 %
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
S tro n g ly Dis a g re e Dis a g re e N e u tra l A g re e S tro n g ly A g re e N o Co m m e n t
d e te rs yo u fro m p a rtic ip a tin g in Go ve rn m e n t ICT co n tra cts ?
m a tch e s ris k p ro file o f Go ve rn m e n t ICT co n tra cts ?
cre a te s b u rd e n in yo u r ca p ita l p ro v is io n in g ?
p re ve n ts co n tra cto rs fro m s u p p ly in g in n o va tive s o lu tio n s to th e Go ve rn m e n t?
N o . o f re s p o n d e n ts : 31
55%
10%
64%
61%
Policy SuggestionsPolicy SuggestionsIndustry survey
Highest priority to see a change in policyHighest priority to see a change in policy
Un lim ite d lia b ility re g im e
4 8 %
S e le ctio n crite ria3 1 %
Te n d e rin g p ro ce s s1 7 %
Pa y m e n t a rra n g e m e n ts
4 %
N o . o f re s p o n d e n ts : 23
Unlimited liability regimeUnlimited liability regime
5 0 %
3 2 %
1 8 %
S u g g e s tio n s o n re fo rm in g th e lia b ility re g im e
Ca p p in g in d ire c t a n d c o n s e q u e n tia l lia b ilitie s fo r a ll Go ve rn m e n t c o n tra c ts
Ca rryin g o u t ris k a s s e s s m e n t e xe rc is e s b e fo re d e te rm in in g lia b ilitie s
M a k in g n e g o tia tio n s w ith c o n tra c to rs to d e te rm in e lia b ilitie s
N o . o f re s p o n d e n ts : 22
Selection criteriaSelection criteria
5 4 %4 2 %
4 %
S u g g e s t io n s o n im p ro vin g th e s e le c t io n c rite ria
M a in ta in in g a fa ir a n d c o m p e titive te n d e rin g e n viro n m e n t
M o re e m p h a s is o n te c h n ic a l co m p e te n c y o f b id d e r
Oth e rs
N o . o f re s p o n d e n ts : 24
Tendering processTendering process
5 0 %
2 1 %
1 7 %
1 2 %
S u g g e s t io n s o n te n d e rin g p ro c e s s
Pro vid in g b id d e rs s u f f ic ie n t tim e to p re p a re te c h n ic a l d e m o n s tra tio n
As s e rtive ly n o tifyin g p o te n tia l b id d e rs a b o u t n e w te n d e rs
To b e m o re re s p o n s ive to b id d e rs ' e n q u irie s
Oth e rs
Payment arrangementsPayment arrangements
4 3 %
3 8 %
9 %
1 0 %
S u g g e s t io n s o n p a ym e n t a rra n g e m e n ts
S a tis fa c to ry re q u ire m e n t s h o u ld b e b a s e d o n o b je c tive ta rg e ts
Re m u n e ra tio n fo r o u t- o f-s c o p e ta s k s s h o u ld b e b a s e d o n m a rke t p re va ilin g ra te o r c o m m e rc ia l n e g o tia tio n sM in im iz in g d e la y in p a ym e n t
Oth e rs
Thank You