13
Energy 32 (2007) 95–107 Autothermal two-stage gasification of low-density waste-derived fuels Stefan Hamel, Holger Hasselbach, Steffen Weil, Wolfgang Krumm Universita ¨ t Siegen, Institut fu ¨ r Energietechnik, Paul-Bonatz-Str. 9-11, D-57068 Siegen, Germany Received 2 December 2005 Abstract In order to increase the efficiency of waste utilization in thermal conversion processes, pre-treatment is advantageous. With the Herhof Stabilat s process, residual domestic waste is upgraded to waste-derived fuel by means of biological drying and mechanical separation of inerts and metals. The dried and homogenized waste-derived Stabilat s fuel has a relatively high calorific value and contains high volatile matter which makes it suitable for gasification. As a result of extensive mechanical treatment, the Stabilat s produced is of a fluffy appearance with a low density. A two-stage gasifier, based on a parallel-arranged bubbling fluidized bed and a fixed bed reactor, has been developed to convert Stabilat s into hydrogen-rich product gas. This paper focuses on the design and construction of the configured laboratory-scale gasifier and experience with its operation. The processing of low-density fluffy waste-derived fuel using small-scale equipment demands special technical solutions for the core components as well as for the peripheral equipment. These are discussed here. The operating results of Stabilat s gasification are also presented. r 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Pyrolysis; Combustion; Fixed bed; Fluidized bed; Hydrogen; Synthesis gas; Fuel feeding 1. Introduction Gasification is by no means a new technology. As early as in the mid 19th century, ‘town gas’ obtained from the gasification of coal was used first for illumination. This was followed by heating, then as a raw material for the chemical industry and more recently for power generation. With the decline of ‘town gas’, caused by the widespread introduction of natural gas and electricity, gasification became a specialized niche technology [1,2]. The search for a more efficient use of existing energy sources and raw materials, initiated by the exploitation of fossil fuels and the release of greenhouse gases, has led to a major renaissance of gasification technology. Nowadays, gasifica- tion is regarded as becoming the main technology for the thermochemical conversion of biomass to energy or synthesis gas. Moreover, gasification offers an attractive alternative to the thermal treatment of solid waste in incineration plants [3]. The number of different uses for product gas clearly indicates the flexibility of gasification and therefore allows it to be integrated into several industrial processes as well as to be used with power generation systems. One of the most difficult aspects of waste as feedstock, whether for gasification or for incineration, is its hetero- geneous nature. The broad variability in chemical composi- tion, water and ash content, heating value and the presence of a number of substances, such as sulphur, chlorides or metals, affects the performance of thermal conversion processes. Waste composition is influenced by numerous local condi- tions, such, for example, as population structure and local waste separation and recycling regulations. In addition, the composition of local waste is subject to major seasonal or even daily variations. For these reasons, feedstock prepara- tion plays an important role in any thermal waste conversion approach. A number of different approaches for waste pre- preparation are known, mostly involving mechanical shred- ding, removal of metals and drying. A promising approach to improve homogeneity and to reduce the amount of contaminants, which has already ARTICLE IN PRESS www.elsevier.com/locate/energy 0360-5442/$ - see front matter r 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2006.03.017 Corresponding author. Tel.: +49 271 740 2634/2633; fax: +49 271 740 2636. E-mail address: [email protected] (W. Krumm).

Hamel hasselbach weil_krumm

  • Upload
    euvt

  • View
    253

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

  • 1. ARTICLE IN PRESS Energy 32 (2007) 95107 www.elsevier.com/locate/energy Autothermal two-stage gasication of low-density waste-derived fuelsStefan Hamel, Holger Hasselbach, Steffen Weil, Wolfgang KrummUniversitat Siegen, Institut fur Energietechnik, Paul-Bonatz-Str. 9-11, D-57068 Siegen, Germany Received 2 December 2005AbstractIn order to increase the efciency of waste utilization in thermal conversion processes, pre-treatment is advantageous. With the HerhofStabilats process, residual domestic waste is upgraded to waste-derived fuel by means of biological drying and mechanical separation ofinerts and metals. The dried and homogenized waste-derived Stabilats fuel has a relatively high caloric value and contains high volatilematter which makes it suitable for gasication. As a result of extensive mechanical treatment, the Stabilats produced is of a uffyappearance with a low density. A two-stage gasier, based on a parallel-arranged bubbling uidized bed and a xed bed reactor, has beendeveloped to convert Stabilats into hydrogen-rich product gas. This paper focuses on the design and construction of the conguredlaboratory-scale gasier and experience with its operation. The processing of low-density uffy waste-derived fuel using small-scaleequipment demands special technical solutions for the core components as well as for the peripheral equipment. These are discussed here.The operating results of Stabilats gasication are also presented.r 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Keywords: Pyrolysis; Combustion; Fixed bed; Fluidized bed; Hydrogen; Synthesis gas; Fuel feeding1. Introduction incineration plants [3]. The number of different uses forproduct gas clearly indicates the exibility of gasication Gasication is by no means a new technology. As earlyand therefore allows it to be integrated into severalas in the mid 19th century, town gas obtained from theindustrial processes as well as to be used with powergasication of coal was used rst for illumination. This wasgeneration systems.followed by heating, then as a raw material for theOne of the most difcult aspects of waste as feedstock,chemical industry and more recently for power generation. whether for gasication or for incineration, is its hetero-With the decline of town gas, caused by the widespreadgeneous nature. The broad variability in chemical composi-introduction of natural gas and electricity, gasicationtion, water and ash content, heating value and the presence ofbecame a specialized niche technology [1,2]. The search for a number of substances, such as sulphur, chlorides or metals,a more efcient use of existing energy sources and rawaffects the performance of thermal conversion processes.materials, initiated by the exploitation of fossil fuels andWaste composition is inuenced by numerous local condi-the release of greenhouse gases, has led to a major tions, such, for example, as population structure and localrenaissance of gasication technology. Nowadays, gasica- waste separation and recycling regulations. In addition, thetion is regarded as becoming the main technology for thecomposition of local waste is subject to major seasonal orthermochemical conversion of biomass to energy or even daily variations. For these reasons, feedstock prepara-synthesis gas. Moreover, gasication offers an attractive tion plays an important role in any thermal waste conversionalternative to the thermal treatment of solid waste inapproach. A number of different approaches for waste pre-preparation are known, mostly involving mechanical shred-Corresponding author. Tel.: +49 271 740 2634/2633; ding, removal of metals and drying.fax: +49 271 740 2636. A promising approach to improve homogeneity and toE-mail address: [email protected] (W. Krumm). reduce the amount of contaminants, which has already0360-5442/$ - see front matter r 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/j.energy.2006.03.017

2. ARTICLE IN PRESS96 S. Hamel et al. / Energy 32 (2007) 95107been successfully demonstrated, is a mechanicalbiological bottom. The fuel particles move slowly down the reactorpre-treatment of waste. An accurate and efcient separa- and react with the gases moving upwards. The fuel passestion of inert materials such as glass, minerals, ferrous and through different reaction zones where various processesnon-ferrous metals usually requires several mechanical such as drying, pyrolysis and oxidation take place.shredding and conditioning stages. The result is a low-The maximum temperature at the bottom is normallydensity uffy material which does not necessarily meet the 9301430 1C [8]. Another type of xed beds are co-currentrequirements of the fuel-feeding system or the gasier itself. gasiers [9]. In a co-current xed bed gasier, the fuel andIn order to avoid extensive upgrading of the uff, either by the gasication agent move in the same direction, wherebyfurther grinding to reduce its size or by pellet forming tothe fuel must pass successively through the drying,increase size and density, careful selection and design of the pyrolysis, oxidation and reduction zones.gasication reactor and its peripheral equipment must beThe advantages of counter-current gasiers are fewerensured. restrictions on fuel moisture content and fuel particle size. The purpose of this paper is to describe the experience Thus no special fuel preparation is generally required and agained in the design, construction and operation of a two- wide range of biomass types can be used as feed material.stage laboratory-scale gasier for processing uffy low- By comparison, co-current gasiers produce a betterdensity Stabilats fuel derived from waste which has been quality gas but place strict requirements on fuel properties.mechanically and biologically pre-treated [4,5]. The main Fluid bed systems allow a more efcient gasication duedesign parameters of the laboratory-scale plant were to the elimination of hot spots inside the reactor. They aredened in co-operation with the manufacturer of Stabi- suitable for various types of feedstock and can be scaled uplats. The most important requirement, which inuencedto relatively large plant sizes. Whilst xed bed gasiers arethe design and the scale of the entire plant, was to process used in the low-capacity range of up to a few MWth,Stabilats as produced by the manufacturer, i.e. withoutuidized bed reactors are typically applied in the rangeany further treatment. over 5 MWth [10]. However, they are more expensive to In the following section, the joint development of thebuild and need better gas cleaning due to the highlaboratory-scale gasier and the specic challenges pre- particulate content in the product gas. Unlike xed bedsented by the small scale of the reactor and their solutionreactors, uidized beds have no dened reaction zones. Theare discussed in detail. The results from different gasica- conversion of fuel particles and the secondary reactions oftion runs using Stabilats are presented. pyrolysis products take place in the same reaction volume. Tar conversion can be supported by the introduction of2. Gasication conceptscatalytically active bed materials. The large amount of solid material in the uidized bed serves as heat storage and Gasication technology permits the production of gasits permanent mixing induced by bubble movement resultsfor a variety of applications such as fuels and chemicals. in a uniform temperature distribution. The maximum bedThe type of application for product gas is in practice temperature is determined by the ash softening point and islimited by the gas quality of the gasication process [6]. Tousually in the range of 8151040 1C [8].meet high gas quality requirements for product gas use, Entrained ow gasiers require pulverized fuels. The fuelmost research activities are focused on gas cleaning byparticles are introduced into the steam/oxygen feed andprimary measures within the gasier, such as reactor gasied at a residence time of a few seconds. Gasiers candesign, optimization of operating parameters and additionbe operated at lower temperatures to maintain ash as a dryof catalytically active materials. Secondary gas cleaningsolid, or at temperatures well above the ash fusion point inmeasures include improvement of downstream clean-upthe slagging mode so that ash is removed as molten liquidsuch as hot gas clean-up and catalytic tar conversion. [11]. Operation at these high temperatures makes itBasically, gasiers can be categorized in several reactorpossible to produce a product gas which is virtually freedesign groups such as single-stage and multi-stage of tar and oil. Entrained ow gasiers have the ability toarrangements.handle practically any fuel as feedstock, provided they are ground to the right, i.e. small, size. Although entrained2.1. Single-stage gasiers ow gasiers may seem attractive for the production of a clean, tar-free synthesis gas for chemical applications, no The aim of a single-stage gasier is to convert organic method of size reduction has yet been found to mill thesubstances entirely in one reactor. Depending on the typebrous biomass materials to a satisfactory size [1].of operation, different gasication agents such as oxygen,However, most of the single-stage gasiers for solidair and/or steam are supplied. The most commonly usedbiomass and waste can be used if the requirements placedgasication technologies for single-stage processes areon product gas quality are low, as is the case for directxed bed, uidized bed and entrained ow reactors. thermal gas use such as co-combustion of hot raw gas in Fixed bed or moving bed gasiers are often counter- coal boilers [12] or use as fuel gas in a cement processcurrent ow systems [7]. The fuel is fed in at the top of the[13]. To improve the gasication process, modern andgasier and the gasication agent is injected near the advanced gasication technologies separate the drying, 3. ARTICLE IN PRESSS. Hamel et al. / Energy 32 (2007) 9510797devolatilization, gasication and combustion reactiongasication reactors are kept separate and are onlyzones. These multi-stage processes enhance process interconnected by heat transfer. In principle, a pyrolysisefciency and product gas quality by combining several stage is necessary to split the fuel into gas and char. Toreaction zones under consideration of various fuel char- provide the heat necessary for autothermal operation, theacteristics such as high reactivity, low ash and sulphur char or part of the pyrolysis gas must be oxidized outsidecontent and high volatile matter.the pyrolysis reactor [18].A double-line plant concept with heat production by2.2. Multi-stage gasierschar combustion is the Fast Internal Circulating Fluidized Bed (FICFB) process developed at the Technical Uni- Various multi-stage processes are currently under versity of Vienna, Austria [19]. The endothermic gasica-development or already in operation. The high volatile tion of the fuel takes place in a stationary uidized bedamount of biomass, which is released rapidly as gaseousconnected via a chute to the combustion chamber which issubstances during pyrolysis, is taken into account inoperated as a circulating uidized bed. The char particlenumerous reactor concepts by spatial subdivision of thecombustion heats up the bed material. The hot bedfuel conversion steps. This makes it possible to inuencematerial is separated by a cyclone and fed back as a heatand optimize the operating parameters in each conversion carrier to the stationary uidized bed. A plant with astep. These concepts can be categorized as single-line orthermal capacity of 8 MWth is in operation in Gussing, double-line processes. Single-line processes use only oneAustria [20].main stream of mass through a number of reactors whichA similar principle has been realized with FERCOsare arranged in series. Double-line processes divide the SILVAGASs process which consists of two circulatingmass stream into at least two partial streams which pass uidized beds (CFB) [21]. The rst CFB is used forthrough parallel-arranged reactors.pyrolysis and partial gasication with steam. The second In Fig. 1(a), a two-stage single-line gasication process CFB is used to combust the remaining char from theaccording to Ref. [14] is shown. The fuel is dried and gasication CFB.pyrolysed in the rst stage in an indirectly heated pyrolyser.Another multi-stage double-line process is the so-The pyrolysis products are subjected to partial oxidationcalled Staged Reforming [22] which is also based on theby air in a narrow zone between pyrolyser and char spatial separation of pyrolysis and heat production. Thegasier. The product gas has to pass the hot char bed whichinput material is fed into the pyrolysis unit, heated up andleads to substantial tar cracking and results in low tar pyrolysed in contact with a hot metallic or mineral heatcontent in the product gas.carrier. The coke and heat carrier thus produced are Other two-stage single-line concepts are, for example, theseparated and the cold heat carrier is fed into a heatcombination of a counter-current and a co-current xed exchanger and heated up again using ue gas frombed gasier [15,16]. A three-stage single-line congurationpyrolysis coke combustion. Raw gas hydrocarbons areentitled Carbo-Vs has been successfully demonstrated,cracked with steam in a reforming unit to form carbondetails can be found in Ref. [17]. monoxide and hydrogen. Another gasication approach is to divide the mass Another two-stage parallel-arranged gasier presented instream into at least two partial streams which are processed this paper is the Herhof-IPV-Verfahrens. A brief descrip-in several parallel-arranged reactors. The heat needed for tion of the process principle is given in the followinggasication can be produced separately by using air forsection, further details of the design, construction andcombustion without affecting the gas quality of theinitial operating results are discussed in the subsequentgasication reactor, see Fig. 1(b). Combustion and chapters.Two-stage parallel gasification Two-stage gasificationGasifier GasifierSteamPyrolysis 1. Stage2. StageRawgas FuelDrying & gasRaw FuelDrying & Tar- & char pyrolysis gas pyrolysisgasification Char CharHeat Heat Gasification Ash Air Flue agentChar combustion gas (a)(b)AshFig. 1. Two-stage single-line and two-stage double-line gasication concept. 4. ARTICLE IN PRESS98S. Hamel et al. / Energy 32 (2007) 951072.3. The Herhof-IPV-Verfahrens dilution of the product gas by nitrogen from the ambient air required for combustion can be avoided. Downstream The Herhof-IPV-Verfahrens is characterized by the of the gasication reactor, the remaining tars and otherparallel arrangement of a xed bed and a bubblingimpurities are separated from the product gas by a gasuidized bed reactor (see Fig. 2). The fuel is fed directlyscrubber and an electrostatic precipitator. The water/tar/into the xed bed reactor lled with hot bed material. dust mixture generated in the gas cleaning can be burntThrough its contact with the hot bed material, rapid dryingdirectly in the uidized bed combustor to ensure economicand pyrolysis of the fuel occurs. The volatiles released,operation of the plant.including tars, pass through the hot ash layer above thefuel feed and leave the reactor at the top. Adding steam in3. Fuel characteristicsthe upper part of the bed enhances tar conversion bycatalytic and/or thermal cracking in the presence of the hot 3.1. Waste treatment for Stabilats productionash particle surface. The remaining char and the bedmaterial move towards the bottom of the gasication The rst step after the delivery of the residual domesticreactor and are transported by a screw conveyor into the waste is its preconditioning with a shredder and a rstuidized bed combustor. The char combustion leads to a separation of ferrous metals. The shredded residual wasteheat-up of the uidized bed material which is then is then kept in a composting box for 7 days. During thisdischarged towards the gasication reactor by a uidized time, a forced air ow through the waste creates optimumloop seal. The energy required for pyrolysis and gasica-conditions for microbial respiration and biological break-tion in autothermal plant operation is generated by char down of organic matter. Warm moist air removed fromcombustion. The combustion and gasication reactors arethe boxes is passed over a heat exchanger, enabling theconnected by circulating solid material, ensuring separa-condensate to be captured, cleaned and used within thetion of gasier raw gas and combustor ue gas. Thus aprocess. The air passed through the boxes is re-circulatedElectrostaticprecipitatorScrubberProductgasFly-ash, Rawtar, water gas Flue gas Fixed bedgasificationBed Bubblingreactormaterial fluidized bed (GR)combustor (BFB) Condensate to analysisFuel Steam Fuel particle Raw Drying Pyrolyzing Bed material + CokeCokeAshAir Fig. 2. The two-stage parallel-arranged gasier designed for the processing of waste-derived fuels. 5. ARTICLE IN PRESS S. Hamel et al. / Energy 32 (2007) 9510799which signicantly reduces the volume of exhaust air required for autothermal operation. The external charemissions. The heat produced during this biologicalcombustion has to provide sufcient energy to facilitateconversion is used in the plant for waste drying [5].pyrolysis and gasication. In the case of low char yields, The prerequisite for the subsequent separation of the part of the Stabilats can be fed directly into the uidizedwaste mixture into various fractions is moisture removal.bed to support heat generation. In the case of high charDuring several downstream process steps, different materi- yields, the gas yields are affected which results in lower coldals are sorted in order nally to obtain Stabilats, plastics gas efciency.(as an option), ferrous and nonferrous metals, batteries, Table 1 presents the elemental and proximate analysisglass (with high separation efciency regarding colour) andof Stabilats compiled on the basis of different references.other inert substances (mixture of ceramics, stones andFig. 5 shows experimental results on char yields fromporcelain). The dry consistency of Stabilats permits easyStabilats pyrolysis at different temperatures and carriedstoring and makes it suitable as a fuel for industrial out with different equipment. The results published by Ref.processes. A picture of Stabilats is shown in Fig. 3. The[23] were obtained in an externally heated batch-fed xedbulk density of the sample displayed is as produced, bed retort with an initial amount of Stabilats of 250300 gusually in the range of 150250 kg/m3. A compaction into for each experiment. The heating rates were comparablypellets is possible if required. However, further pelletizingslow at some 3 K/min with the aim of producing ashould be avoided for economic reasons and the Stabilats maximum char yield. Pyrolysis experiments in a batchpreferably used as produced. The statistical average rotary kiln, which was also externally heated, werecomposition is summarized in Fig. 4. performed by Ref. [24] using an amount of 1000 g for each run. The heating rates of individual particles introduced3.2. Pyrolysis of Stabilatsinto an already formed bed inside the rotary kiln were some 550 K/min for wall temperatures of 900 1C.For the intended processing of Stabilats in a two-stage For our own pyrolysis experiments, small amounts ofgasier, pyrolysis behaviour is critical for the process some 15 g were used for each data point. The sample wasdesign. The pyrolysis conditions and thus the resultingdivided into eight portions of 12 g, each placed in a cokingpyrolysis products determine the distribution of energy into crucible and exposed to the designated temperature in athe gaseous phase and char. A certain amount of char ismufe furnace for 7 min. The procedure follows the determination of the volatile matter content of solid fuels (900 1C, 7 min) according to DIN 51720. The range of data points for the char yields obtained is displayed in Fig. 5 within the grey area, the average is depicted as a dashed line. Firstly, the expected decrease of char yield with increasing temperature is obvious. Secondly, the inuence of sample size is indirectly visible. Whilst the data points of Ref. [24], who used an amount of 1000 g, show less deviation, our own results obtained from small sample sizes show a large range of remaining char yields (grey area). This effect may be explained by heterogeneous fuel composition. The composition of Stabilats can be considered homogeneous compared to the original waste source and can, of course, be called homogeneous when large quantities are processed. However, with decreasing sample size, waste-derived material appears to be of a Fig. 3. Stabilats sample. heterogeneous nature. It is no longer possible with Inert materials Materials from (stones, glass,metal)biomass sources < 1 wt.-%(paperboard/paper, textiles, wood, organic compounds)about 65 wt.-% Material of fossil sources (textiles, vulcanized rubber, composite materials, etc.)Plastics about 25wt.-% about 9 wt.-% Fig. 4. Main constituents of Stabilats, as determined in long-term statistical analysis [4]. 6. ARTICLE IN PRESS100S. Hamel et al. / Energy 32 (2007) 95107Table 1Comparison of different published compositions of StabilatsReference[23][24] [25]Own results No. 1No. 2No. 1 No. 2RangeAverageWater content (raw)10.5012.7 24.09.411.5 15Mass%Ash content (dry)33.1026.3020.627.5 17 23.5Mass%Volatile matter (dry)57.0064.4071.166.9 Mass%C (daf)59 59 57.659.247.6354.43 48.9958.34 Mass%H (daf)7.17.17.7 8.16.808.847.48 7.97Mass%O (daf)30 30 32.128.836.7451.71 40.8230.80 Mass%N (daf)1.9 1.90.952.721.50 1.80Mass%Lower heating value (dry)14,900 18,700 18,25016,770 13,00015,70014,300 kJ/kg 0.7Literature data Own results 0.6Retort [23] AverageRotary kiln [24]RangeChar yield in kg/kg(daf) 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1Feedstock: Stabilat 0.0300400500 600 700 800900 1000Pyrolysis temperature in C s Fig. 5. Char yields from Stabilatpyrolysis, comparison of literature data and own results.decreasing sample size to ensure a representative material amount of fuel into the reactor at a rate as steady andmixture with the original particle size. This is also reected uniform as possible. At the same time, the feeding systemin the pyrolysis results in Fig. 5.has to seal the reactors against environment and serve as fuel storage in order to supply fuel for about 30 to 60 min.4. Design, construction and operation of the gasierDuring design of the system, the advantages and disadvantages of fully automated fuel-feeding apparatus The laboratory plant, with a maximum thermal power of were discussed in detail. Since the focus of the project was150 kW, consists of many parts other than the core reactor the development and testing of the gasication reactor, thecomponents, such as extensive peripheral equipment for decision was ultimately taken to build rst a partly manualthe supply of auxiliary energy, gasication agent, pressur-feeding system with the option of full automation in theized air for pneumatic devices, handling of product gas andfuture. The main reason for this was that in the case of fullcontrol and measurement systems. Since the peripheralautomation, a scale-down of the entire conveying andequipment is usually regarded as state-of-the-art, the storage devices would be necessary.following description focuses on the newly developed main Although the manufacturer has extensive experience incomponents which had to be carefully designed for the task the design and operation of large-scale plants for thein question. production, handling, storage and conveying of Stabilats, the prevailing opinion was that problems were to be4.1. Stabilats feeding systemexpected from a scale-down to feeding rates of some 1030 kg/h.The current feeding system performs several tasks which The aim of the solution identied is to feed Stabilatsare slightly different to those of a full-scale plant. In themanually in a cycle of about 30 min from barrels or bagscase of the laboratory-scale equipment, the general task into the lock hopper which simply consists of a chargesimilar to that of a full-scale plant is to feed a denedhopper (a in Fig. 6) and a lock hopper (c in Fig. 6) between 7. ARTICLE IN PRESSS. Hamel et al. / Energy 32 (2007) 95107101Fuel a Lock hopper Seal of the b slide valvesFlangeI c N2+ air dN2openclose Slider e N2 II Cooling waterf gWaterWaterFuelWater Expansion WaterjointFig. 6. The Stabilats feeding system.two pneumatic access slide valves (b+d in Fig. 6). This is a fuels or biomass are caused by a mismatch of the internalwell-known principle which has proven to be reliable for transport system to the fuel properties. A particularfeeding solids into pressurized reactors [26]. After placing problem, called bridging, which causes interruptions inthe fuel in the lock hopper, it was ushed with nitrogen the material ow, is described as the phenomenon where abefore being released into a vertical bin (e in Fig. 6) below. particulate solid fuel forms a stable structure across anThis bin serves as fuel storage for the fuel screw feeder (g inopening. Several parameters are known to increaseFig. 6) which is mounted at the bottom. To ensure theparticulate fuels tendency to bridge over openings. Thiscontinuous transportation of Stabilats, a paddle mixer (fincludes particle shape and size distribution, depth of thein Fig. 6) was additionally installed above the screwfuel bed over an opening and moisture content. Investiga-conveyer to prevent blockage or bridging. The completely tions for different biomasses indicate that especially thecooled screw, comprising separate cooling of the conveying proportion of long and hook-shaped particles inuencestube jacket, the double central tube and the screw wings signicantly the tendency to form bridges [27,28]. Increas-(see detail II in Fig. 6), forces the Stabilats into the xeding moisture content usually accentuates this inuence. Inbed reactor. A considerable part of the Stabilats is madethe current task of handling refuse-derived fuel, not onlyup of different types of plastics with low softening the presence of long particles is seen as a cause oftemperatures and also of substances with comparably lowconveying difculties but also their concurrence with largestarting temperatures for pyrolysis (see Fig. 4). Thereforeamounts of soft and low-density uffy matter. Further-extensive cooling of the screw is necessary to prevent more, the small diameters of hopper and auger makemelting and pyrolysis in the feeding system, especiallyhandling difcult.inside the conveying tube.In order to avoid problems with the hopper system, the It is known that many of the operating problems diameter from the charge hopper down to the screwexperienced in plants for processing waste, refuse-derived conveyor is enlarged. Before selecting a pneumatic slide 8. ARTICLE IN PRESS102 S. Hamel et al. / Energy 32 (2007) 95107valve, the clear diameter of the opening has to be carefullygasier, from fuel feed down to the bottom, is designed tochecked. The best results for the ow through the slide be 2030 min, depending on the desired solid circulationvalves were achieved when choosing not the nominal size rate. The amount of circulating solid heat carrier materialaccording to the pipe diameter but the next standard size.is about 10 kg/kgfuel for the experiments presented here.In turn, the clear diameter is large enough to be able toThe residence time of the released volatiles through theextend the pipe length of the hopper beyond the connectionhot bed material layer is in the range of 24 s. Due toange so that the pipe ends as closely as possible above thedrying and pyrolysis reactions inside the gasier, the hotslider (see detail I in Fig. 6). This avoids rough edges on the bed material cools down and internal temperature zonesone hand and on the other hand prevents, as far asare formed. The temperature level at the top of the gasierpossible, contact of the solids with the sealing of the slider. is up to 920 1C, depending on uidized bed operation The bin below the lock hopper is also designed so that temperature, and reaches about 500600 1C at the bottomthe diameter is enlarged in ow direction towards the of the gasier.paddle mixer. The paddle mixer prevents the formation of The addition of steam into the conical part above thebridges and ensures the continuous lling of the screwfuel feed is carried out by a ring line and several nozzlesfeeder with fuel. Experience clearly showed that the paddle mounted along the perimeter. Steam serves on the onemixer is the most important component for ensuringhand as a reactant to support tar conversion and gas phasereliable material ow. The positioning of the hopper binreactions and on the other hand effects a continuousdirectly either on a small or a large diameter screw feeder loosening of the bulk solid.without a paddle mixer was not successful. After a coupleIn the upper zone of the gasier, the hot bed materialof minutes, a bridge formed over the auger. This simple layer, in combination with the added steam, supports targravity-driven movement of the material downwards ontocracking before the raw gas produced is piped at the top ofthe screw was obviously not effective enough to ll the the gasier into a gas-cleaning unit. The gas is analysed in ascrew. Visual inspections indicate that the uffy bulk is gas analysis device and combusted in a post-combustionhighly elastic and tends to spring back from the auger so unit without any further utilization.that the screw wings were unable to force the material intothe conveying tube. Feeding was only possible once the4.3. Fluidized bed combustion reactorpaddle mixer was installed, but the conveying character-istics were ultimately improved by designing the auger withThe task of the uidized bed is to burn the char from thea conical shape at the end. This affects the way in which the gasier and simultaneously to ensure the transportation ofpaddle mixer pushes the material onto the conical part of bed material in an upward direction. The coke/bedthe auger which then forces the material in the conveying material mixture is fed with a temperature of somedirection as it rotates.500600 1C from the xed bed gasier into the uidizedbed. The feeding point is in the lower part of the uidized4.2. Gasication reactorbed above the air distributor. The preheated air enteringthe uidized bed oxidizes the char, which mainly consists of The gasier is designed as a cylindrical reactor with acarbon, and the bed material is heated up as a result ofnarrow cone above the fuel feeding point. The subsequentexothermic combustion reactions. The operation is carriedenlargement of the diameter downwards aims to achieve out in bubbling uidization mode, thus a simple overowbetter mixing and heat transfer between the hot heat carrierwas chosen to adjust the bed height and to discharge theand the Stabilats introduced and thus lead to better fuel bed material towards the gasication reactor.conversion. A cooled screw conveyor forces the Stabilats In order to be able to investigate experimentally thedirectly into the bulk of hot bed material, see Figs. 6 and 2.inuence of relevant parameters and their interaction, theThrough its contact with the hot bed material, drying and plant design must be as exible as possible in order to takepyrolysis take place, the gas moves in counter-current owinto account different operating parameters. In the currentto the bed material and leaves the reactor at the top. Thecase, the uidized bed is inuenced directly or indirectly bybed material, together with the remaining coke, isnumerous factors. The properties of the char remainingdischarged at the bottom by another cooled screw feeder from pyrolysis, such as heating value, yield and reactivity,directly into the uidized bed combustion reactor. Theare expected to be in a wide range due to the heterogeneousmixture of coke and bed material is cooled down on its waynature of the feedstock. The char yield, which dependsdownwards and has a temperature of about 500600 1C atmainly on fuel properties and feed rate but also onthe bottom. Therefore in order to minimize heat loss, the pyrolysis conditions, determines the amount of requiredcooling of the screw conveyor is dimensioned so that thecombustion air. The uidized bed temperature is a result ofsteel of the screw is just protected against high tempera-heat release from char combustion, temperature and owtures and no further unnecessary cooling of the solid rate of the primary air itself, temperature and ow rate ofoccurs. the bed material fed from the gasier and of the reactor The solid material ow inside the gasier is driven by heat loss. Air ow rate and resulting uidized bed temp-gravity. The mean solid fuel residence time inside theerature in combination with geometric design determine 9. ARTICLE IN PRESS S. Hamel et al. / Energy 32 (2007) 95107103the subsequent uidization patterns. The desired andThe solids slide over the inclined plane into the dischargepossible hydrodynamic uidized bed operation mode pipe which is emptied manually by a slide valve. The hotdecides nally about the allowed and realizable range ofsolids fall into a sealed box and are collected until the endthe above-mentioned parameters. Since some of the of the experiment.parameters are not known a priori and others uctuateconsiderably, it is not possible to dene the optimal 4.4. Loop sealoperation point. The design of the air distributor is important for exibleMany chemical or energy-related processes such asoperation. During operation, the gas distributor must combustion or gasication recirculate solids and useensure that the gas is distributed on entry as evenly aspreferably non-mechanical solid ow devices. In the valvepossible across the uidized bed. When the gas ow is mode of operation, the solid ow through the non-stopped, the solids must be prevented from raining throughmechanical device can be controlled by the amount ofthe distributor into the plenum. In most small-scale studies, uidization gas, whilst in automatic mode, solid owporous plate or perforated plate distributors are used. The corresponds to the natural circulation rate of the process.advantage is that they are inexpensive and easy toA comprehensive overview of different standpipes andmanufacture and normally ensure good gas distribution non-mechanical valves and their operation is given by Ref.for a wide range of operating parameters [29]. For large- [32].scale applications, especially with difcult operating con-In the current laboratory-scale plant, hot bed material isditions such as high temperature or a highly reactive transported between the two reactors and the mixing of ueenvironment, tuyere designs are used. A detailed compar-gas and product gas is avoided by using a loop seal. A loopison concerning design, construction, advantages andseal is essentially a variation of the well-known seal potdisadvantages of all types of gas distributors can be found [32]. Like the seal pot, it comprises a standpipe and ain Refs. [2931]. uidized bed section. Hot bed material leaves the uidized It must furthermore be taken into account in the current bed combustor via an overow into the standpipe of thecase that inert material particles of larger size and particles loop seal. The bed material from the standpipe enters theunsuitable for uidization (e.g. metal) will most probablysteam uidized bed section of the loop seal from the sidebe fed in with the fuel. The possibility for a discontinuousbefore it is discharged towards the gasication reactor.discharge of solids at the bottom of the uidized bed must To ensure the separation of the ue gas from thetherefore be taken into account in the design. The aircombustion and the product gas from the gasier, rst ofdistributor realized is displayed in Fig. 7. A nozzle-typeall the pressure in the freeboard of both reactors has to bedesign with a comparably high specic pressure drop was kept at the same level. In fact, there are slight pressurebuilt in order to ensure that air distribution is as uniform as uctuations in both reactors. In the bubbling uidized bedpossible over a wide air ow and to prevent a backow ofcombustor, these are mainly caused by bubble activity andsolids into the plenum. At the same time, large inert in the gasication reactor by gas generation which is notparticles have the opportunity to settle between the nozzles. always uniform. To enhance the pressure sealing of theloop seal, the height of the solid packing in the standpipeFluidized can be increased.bedA pressure measurement below the air distributor of the Nozzlesuidized bed combustion reactor provides a signal which isproportional to the bed height. A steady-state pressurelevel is achieved during operation with constant bed height.Stopping the loop seal uidization interrupts the transportof solids towards the gasication reactor and, as a Inclined consequence, the height of the uidized bed in the planecombustor rises. The increase of bed height in the uidizedbed combustor becomes apparent through the increasingSolid pressure across the bed (see Fig. 8). To increase the dischargeefciency of the gas separation, the steam injection for loopAir seal uidization was carried out discontinuously. Whenstopping loop seal uidization, rst the height of the solidpacking increases until the standpipe is completely lledand then the uidized bed height in the combustorincreases. After the addition of steam into the loop sealrecommences, the transport of the solids continues and thePlenumprevious pressure level is reached again. The discontinuousBed materialoperation of the loop seal is shown in Fig. 9. Although Fig. 7. Design of air distributor, solid discharge and plenum. solid temperatures of 900 1C are reached in the uidized 10. ARTICLE IN PRESS104S. Hamel et al. / Energy 32 (2007) 95107bed combustor, the recorded pressure indicates a reliable 5. Gasication resultsoperation of solid ow. The gasier at the University of Siegen (see Fig. 2) was4.5. Bed material operated using Stabilats and wood as feedstock. A plot ofproduct gas concentrations during operation with Stabi- The task of the bed material is to transfer heat producedlats fuel is shown in Fig. 11. In the laboratory plant,in the combustion reactor to the gasication reactor. The nitrogen was used to inert the lock hopper fuel feedinghot bed material is transported, as described earlier, by a system. Nitrogen content in the dry product gas was in theuidized loop seal into the gasier, providing the heat range of 37 vol% as a result of the inerting procedure. Toneeded for drying, pyrolysis and gas phase and tarbe able to compare the experimental results from differentconversion reactions. For the start-up, silica sand with aruns the gas concentrations are related to dry and N2-freeparticle size between 0.2 and 0.6 mm was used as initial bedbasis.material. As the experimental run time progresses, the Both reactors were heated up simultaneously for theoriginal silica sand is slowly replaced by fuel ash. Fig. 10start-up using preheated hot air to reach operationpresents the size distribution of initial silica sand and bed temperature. Solid circulation was adjusted to ensurematerial after some 40 h of operation. It appears that theuniform heat-up of both reactors and bed material. Oncesize distribution shifts towards larger particle sizes due to the operating temperature had been reached, air wasthe accumulation of fuel ash. The diameter of the average replaced by nitrogen in the pyrolysis reactor until themass of bed material shifts from 0.277 to 0.385 mm. So far, measured oxygen concentration was almost zero. Fuelthe change in particle size has not noticeably affected the feeding then commenced, followed by replacement ofoperating characteristics of the uidized bed, loop seal andnitrogen with steam after a certain period of time, seemoving bed.1000.5 800 Cumulative amount in kg/kg10-1 600pBelow distributor BFB Pressure in hPa10-2 400Initial silica sand10-3Bed material after 200 Steam into 40 h experiment loop seal ON ON BFB OFF10-4 0 Steam05:45 05:5506:05 06:15 0.010.11.0 10Run time in hh:mmDiameter in mmFig. 8. Effect of discontinuous loop seal operation on bubbling uidizedFig. 10. Particle size distribution of initial silica sand and bed materialbed combustor.after 40 h of operation. 1.0005800 4 Temperature in C TBFB pBelow distributor BFBSteam in kg/h Pressure in hPa600TGR crackzoneSteam into loop seal3400 2200 1 0009:1509:20 09:25 09:3009:3509:4009:45 Run time in hh:mm Fig. 9. Discontinuous operation mode of the loop seal. 11. ARTICLE IN PRESS S. Hamel et al. / Energy 32 (2007) 95107 105 Run no.: TS10 Fuel:Stabilat60 mfuel: 8.31 kg/h Concentration in vol.-% [dry + N2 free]Steam addition (replacing N2 with N2 inerting of steamin gasification reactor) Steam to fuel ratio:0.44 kg/kg gasification50 reactor H240 TBFB= 920 C30Start of TGR crackzone = 860 Cfuel feed CO220CH4O210 CO N is used for inerting the lock hopper fuel feeding system 2001:00 02:00 03:0004:00 05:0006:00 07:0008:00Run time (hh:mm)Fig. 11. Product gas concentrations during operation of the Herhof-IPV-Verfahrens with Stabilats.Fig. 11. During the following 5 h (displayed in Fig. 11), theConcentration in vol.-% Lower Heating Value (LHV) gas in MJ/moperating parameters were kept constant. Gas sampling(dry + N2 free) (std., dry + N2 free)16was carried out continuously after the scrubber unit. The scrubber unit consists of a quench cooler whichcools the raw gas by injecting water. The cooled productgas subsequently moves through a column lled with Pall14rings in counter-current ow to the washing liquid. Exp. Data TrendEntrained nes and condensed tars are collected in the LHV gasliquid which was analysed after each experiment.50 12 The gas sample was dried for analytical purposes, i.e. to Meas.Trenddetect the main gas components. A time-averaged hydro- H2gen concentration of about 45 vol% (dry and N2-free gas) CO40 CH4was achieved in this particular run. The cumulated gas CO2production was measured during the experiment for severaltime intervals of some 10 min. The dry gas yields obtained30were in the range of 0.560.7 m3 (std. dry) per kg Stabilatsfor run No. 10 (Fig. 11). The composition corresponds toan average lower heating value (LHV) of the producer gasof some 13:3 MJ=m3 std:;dryN2 free ; one third of natural gas20LHV. In Fig. 12, the time-averaged concentrations fromseveral runs with Stabilats are plotted over the tempera- 10Fuel: Stabilatture in the pyrolysis zone near the fuel feeding port. AfterSteam/Fuel: 0.15 - 0.5 kg/kgrst start-up of the equipment, the gasier was operated N2 is used for inerting the lock hopper fuel feeding systemsystematically from low to higher temperatures. The0preferred operating point is in the range of high600700800900temperatures where a maximum gas yield and highTemperature pyrolysis zone in Chydrogen content can be obtained. The effect of tempera-Fig. 12. Concentrations of gas produced in the processing of Stabilats.ture in the pyrolysis zone of the gasier on gas compositionand heating value is shown in Fig. 12. The evaluation of all the experimental data obtained tofuel feeding was only involved during the fuel operationdate substantiates the repeatability of the measured values.period of each run. However, the results showed that theOne run usually takes about 24 h from start-up of the coldequipment components worked as planned for an overallplant to shutdown, during which the period of fueltime of approximately 450 h including some 100 h of fueloperation was usually in the range of 68 h. Part of theoperation. The next targets are:equipment, e.g. that needed for the solid circulation such asloop seal, bed material screw and uidized bed, worked forto increase fuel operation time which is mainly athe whole run time, whilst the equipment concerned withquestion of the availability of scientic staff; 12. ARTICLE IN PRESS106 S. Hamel et al. / Energy 32 (2007) 95107 to vary further operating parameters in order tostoffen/ Trockenstabilats in der Mono-/Mitverbrennung). Presenta-determine their inuence on gas quality;tion at VDI-Seminar (46-56-02) Abfall- und Kostenmanagement furVerbrennungsanlagen, Bamberg, 2122 June 2001 [in German]. to use different bed materials in order to improve gas[5] Wengenroth K. New developments in the dry stabilate process.quality.Aufbereitungstechnik 2005;46(3):1427.[6] Kleinhappl M. Gas cleaning in biomass gasication plants. In:An important step in the optimization of the process is toProceedings of an expert meeting pyrolysis and gasication ofbe expected from the installation of a tar measurementbiomass and waste. Strasbourg, France: 2003. ISBN:1-872691-77-3.[7] Teislev B. Harboore-Woodchips updraft gasier and 1,500 kW gassystem to analyse the raw gas directly after the gasicationengines operating at 32% power efciency in CHP conguration. In:reactor. To date, tar yields and compositions are detectedProceedings of 12th European conference on biomass for energy,only by analysing the quench water and washing liquid.industry and climate protection. Amsterdam, Netherlands: 2002.Tar values so far obtained give only a lump-sum yield.p. 10279. ISBN:88-900442-5-X.That means all tars released during the experiment, [8] Klass DL. Biomass for renewable energy, fuels, and chemicals. NewYork: Academic Press; 1998.whether from unsteady state in start-up or from parameter[9] Barrio M, Fossum M, Hustad JE. A small-scale stratied downdraftadjustments, are summarized in the lump-sum amount. gasier coupled to a gas engine for combined heat and powerTherefore this information is not detailed enough and production. In: Bridgwater AV, editor. Progress in thermochemicalunsuitable for analysing the inuence of varying operatingbiomass conversion. vol. 1. 2001. p. 42640. ISBN:0632055332.parameters or different bed materials.[10]Spliethoff H. Status of biomass gasication for power production.IFRF Combust J 2001 Article Number 200109.[11]Thome-Kozmiensky KJ. Thermal waste treatment (Thermische6. SummaryAbfallbehandlung). Berlin: EF-Verlag fur Energie- und Umwelttech-nik GmbH; 1994 [in German]. The development of gasication processes for waste-derived [12]Moritz G, Tauschitz J. Co-combustion of biomass in coal powerfuels tends to result in multi-stage systems in which the plants (Mitverbrennung von Biomasse in Kohlekraftwerken). 4th Int.Fachsymposium Marktreife Holzvergaser-Technik, Landesgewer-parallel-arranged approaches offer high potential and several beamt Baden-Wurttemberg, Karlsruhe [in German]. advantages. In general, parallel-arranged generation of heat[13]Scur P, Rott A. Environmental compatibility and plant safety whenby combustion of char and spatially separated devolatilizationusing secondary materials at the Rudersdorf cement works. ZKG Intand gasication prevents mixing of ue gas and raw gas and1999;52(11):596602.therefore provides an undiluted producer gas. [14]Henriksen U, Ahrenfeldt J, Kvist Jensen T, Gobel B, Bentzen JD,Hindsgaul C, et al. The design, construction and operation of a 75 kW In the Herhof-IPV-Verfahrens presented here, the two-two stage gasier. Energy 2005, in press, doi:10.1016/j.energy.2005.05.031.stage parallel arrangement is realized by coupling a xed [15]Senger W. Combi-gasierenergy from wood (Kombi-Vergaserbed gasier and a uidized bed combustor. The forced fuel Energiebundel Holz). Umwelt 2001;06:346 [in German]. feed directly into the xed bed reactor offers several[16]Kurkela E, Simell P, Haavisto I. Combined heat and poweradvantages which enhance the processing of low-densityproduction by novel xed-bed gasication technology. Dusseldorf: VDI Verlag; 2005 VDI-Berichte No. 1891, p. 223232.uffy fuel such as the investigated Stabilats. The setting up [17]Wolf B, Meyer B. Process technology and main equipment of theof a technical-scale plant for processing low-density fuelmulti-stage gasication of coal and biomass according to the Carbo-required specic solutions for several plant components.V-Process (Verfahrenstechnik und Hauptausrustung der mehrstu-Initial experience and results from gasication runsgen Vergasung von Kohle und Biomasse nach dem Carbo-V-demonstrate the successful operation of all core compo- Verfahren). DGMK-Tagungsbericht 20001. 2000. p. 20512.ISBN:3-931850-65-X.nents. Sufciently good gas qualities with high hydrogen[18]den Uil H. CASST: A new and advanced process for biomasscontents have already been achieved.gasication. In: Bridgwater AV, editor. Progress in thermochemicalbiomass conversion, vol. 1. 2001. p. 28797. ISBN:0632055332.Acknowledgement [19]Hofbauer H, Rauch R, Foscolo P, Matera D. Hydrogen rich gasfrom biomass steam gasication. In: Proceedings of 1st worldconference on biomass for energy and industry. Sevilla, Spain: 59The authors gratefully acknowledge the nancial sup-June 2000. p. 19992001.port of the German Federal Environmental Foundation [20]Rauch R, Hofbauer H, Bosch K, Siefert I, Aichernig C, Tremmel H,(DBU) and the nancial and technical support of Herhof- et al. Steam gasication of biomass at CHP plant in GuessingstatusUmwelttechnik GmbH. of the demonstration plant. In: Proceedings of 2nd world conferenceand technology exhibition on biomass for energy, industry andclimate protection. Rome, Italy: 2004.References[21]Paisley MA, Overend RP. The SilvaGass Process from future energyresourcesa commercialization success. In: Proceedings of 12th[1] Higman C, van der Burgt M. Gasication. Amsterdam: Elsevier;european conference on biomass for energy, industry and climate2003. protection. Amsterdam, Netherlands: 2002.[2] Belgiorno V, De Feo G, Della Rocca C, Napoli RMA. Energy from [22]Sonntag T-M. Energy and hydrogen from biomassstaged reform-gasication of solid wastes. Waste Manage 2003;23:115. ingthe blue tower. Aufbereitungstechnik 2003;44(9):4750.[3] Malkow T. Novel and innovative pyrolysis and gasication[23]Niederdrank J. Investigation of coke production by thermal technologies for energy efcient and environmentally sound MSWupgrading of mechanical-biological stabilized waste (Untersuchungdisposal. Waste Manage 2004;24:5379. zur Gewinnung von Carbonisaten aus der thermischen Veredlung[4] Ramthun F. Thermal Conversion of Secondary Fuel/Stabilats inmechanisch-biologisch stabilisierter Restabfalle). RWTH Aachen,Mono-/Co-combustion (Thermische Umsetzung von Ersatzbrenn-PhD thesis, 2002. ISBN:3-8322-0035-5 [in German]. 13. ARTICLE IN PRESSS. Hamel et al. / Energy 32 (2007) 95107 107[24] Gummersbach J. Experimental Investigation of Pyrolysis in a Rotary [28] Jensen P D, Mattsson J E, Kofman P D, Klausner A. Tendency of Kiln as part of a Gasication Plant with Char Combustionwood fuels from whole trees, logging residues and roundwood to (Experimentelle Untersuchung der Pyrolyse in einem Drehrohr als bridge over openings. Biomass Bioenergy 2004;26:10713. Bestandteil einer Vergasungsanlage mit Restkoksverbrennung). Uni-[29] Kunii D, Levenspiel O. Fluidization engineering. 2nd ed. London: versity of Siegen; 2005. PhD thesis. ISBN:3-8322-4618-5 [in German].Butterworth-Heinemann; 1991.[25] Heering M. Investigation and development of a decentralized plant[30] VGB-M 218 H. Gas distributors in uidized bed Systems (Gasvertei- for energetic utilization of mechanical-biological stabilized waste lerboden in Wirbelschichtsystemen). 1st ed. VGB Technischen (Untersuchung und Entwicklung einer dezentralen Anlage zurVereinigung der Grosskraftwerksbetreiber e.V., Essen; 1994. energetischen Verwertung mechanisch-biologisch stabilisierter Ab-[31] Reddy Karri SB, Werther J. Gas distributor and plenum design falle). RWTH Aachen. PhD thesis. 1998 [in German]. in uidized beds. In: Yang W-C, editor. Handbook of uidization[26] Cummer KR, Brown RC. Ancillary equipment for biomass gasica- and uid-particle systems. New YorkBasel: Marcel Dekker Inc; tion. Biomass Bioenergy 2002;23:11328. 2003. p. 15570.[27] Mattsson JE, Kofman PD. Inuence of particle size and moisture [32] Knowlton TM. Standpipes and nonmechanical valves. In: Yang W- content on tendency to bridge in biofuels made from willow shoots.C, editor. Handbook of uidization and uid-particle systems. Biomass Bioenergy 2003;24:42935. New YorkBasel: Marcel Dekker Inc; 2003. p. 57197.