9
Is 2012 ''Accessibility Armageddon'' for Technical Communicators? STC 2012 Summit May 22, 2012 Mike Paciello, TPG Copyright The Paciello Group 2012©

Is 2012 "Accessibility Armageddon" for Technical Communicators

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Is 2012 "Accessibility Armageddon" for Technical Communicators

Is 2012 ''Accessibility Armageddon'' for Technical Communicators?

STC 2012 SummitMay 22, 2012

Mike Paciello, TPG

Copyright The Paciello Group 2012©

Page 2: Is 2012 "Accessibility Armageddon" for Technical Communicators

Tech Standards Summary- Section 508- Section 255- TEITAC- Communications Act- ADA ANPRM

Copyright The Paciello Group 2012©

Page 3: Is 2012 "Accessibility Armageddon" for Technical Communicators

A Celebration of Usability in Civic Life Access + Usability

TEITAC

New Recommendations for Section 508Sarah Swierenga, Whitney Quesenbery, Kate Walser, and Michael Paciello, Co-Chair, TEITAC

Who: The Telecommunications and Electronic and Information Technology Advisory Board Committee (TEITAC): 41 members from industry, government and disabilities advocacy groups

What: Recommendations for how the U.S. Access Board should update Section 508 (and Section 255) regulations.

Why: To make ICT products accessible to as wide a range of people with disabilities as possible.

When: July 2006 – April 2008

Requirements based on product characteristics rather than product types. How do we classify products that have so many features?

Functional Performance Criteria (FPC) refer to different disability categories and the necessity of providing access to the functionality of products.  The FPC have been modified from the previous version to include a note on the role of assistive technology in meeting the FPC. Products must provide at least one mode that allows access to all functionality of the product: A – Without Vision

G – Without SpeechB – With Limited Vision

H – With Limited Reach, Strength or ManipulationC – With Color Vision Deficits I – Without Physical ContactD – Without Hearing

J – With Cognitive, Language, or Learning LimitationsE – With Limited Hearing

Subpart B: Functional Performance Criteria

1194.23(g)Volume Reset2.2.F1194.23(f)Volume (Gain)2.2.E1194.25(f)Volume2.2.D1194.25(e)Audio Connection2.2.C1194.23(i)Interference with Hearing Device2.2.B1194.23(h)Magnetic Coupling2.2.A1194.25(j)Installed or Free-Standing Products2.1.F1194.26(d)Standard Connection2.1.E1194.25(c), 1194.26(b)Touch Operated2.1.D1194.23(k), 1194.26(a)Mechanical Controls2.1.C1194.21(i), 1194.25(j), 1194.25(k)Flashing2.1.B1194.21(j), 1194,25(h)Reflectance Contrast for Legends and Passive Displays2.1.A1194.23(e)Speech Operation1-H Text size1-G1194.21(i), 194.25(g)Color1-F Visual Information1-E Audio information1-D1194.23(j)Pass Through1-C1194.25(d), 1194.26(c) Biometric ID1-B1194.25(a)Closed Functionality1-A Subpart C 

Section 508 SourceTEITAC Recommendations

 Accessible Content 2.D Accessibility Configuration2.C Video Support 2.B Relay Services Accessibility2.A Training1.2-C Manufacturer Contact1.2-B1194.41(c)Support Services1.2-A Support and E&IT related services1.2 Keyboard Shortcuts1.1-B194.41(a), 194.41(b)Accessible Documentation and Features1.1-A Product Documentation and Help1.1 Information, Documentation & Support1 Subpart D  Accessible Templates7.D Prompts7.C Preserve Accessibility Information7.B Accessible Output7.A Authoring Tools7 External Alerting Devices6.G Audio clarity for VoIP6.F Video Support6.E Caller and Status Information6.D1194.23(c) IVR, Auto-Attendant and Messaging6.C1194.23(a)Voice Terminal Hardware & Software6.B1194.23(b)Real-Time Text Reliability & Interoperability6.A1194.24(d), 1194..22(b)Interactive Elements5.C1194.24(d) Video Description5.B1194.24(c)Captions and Transcripts5.A Access to Caption and Video Controls4.C1194.24(b)Supplemental Audio Playback (Process?)4.B1194.24(a)Caption Process4.A Headings and Labels3.BB Error Identification3.AA On Input3.Z On Focus3.Y Labels or Instructions3.X Multiple Ways3.W Assistive Technology3.VV Accessibility Services3.V1194.21(d), (c), (f) & (m)AT Interoperability3.U1194.21(c)Focus Indicator3.T Visual Indication of Keyboard Shortcuts3.SS1194.21(a), (e), (f), (k), (l) & (m)Keyboard Operation3.S1194.22(p), 1194.23(d), 1194.25(b)Timing3.R1194.21(b)Disruption of Access Features3.Q

1194.21(l), 1194.22(l), 1194.22(n)User Interface Components3.P1194.22(g), (h), (i), & (n), & (o), 1194.21(l)Information and Relationships3.O Link Purpose3.N1194.22(d) Reading Sequence3.M1194.25(e)Audio Turnoff3.L1194.21(e)Consistent Identification3.K

1194.21(k), 1194.22(j), 1194.25(i)Flashing (Content and User Interfaces)3.J1194.21(h)Pausing3.I Language of Parts3.H Human Language3.G1194.22(a)Non-text Objects3.F1194.21(j)Color Adjustment3.E1194.21(g)User Preferences3.D Size, shape, location3.C1194.21(j)Contrast3.B1194.21(i), 1194.22(c), 1194.25(h) Color3.A

What’s New?

We considered:

Testability – Can we create standards that are precise and unambiguous enough to easily determine if products meet the requirements, but open enough so that the provisions do not stifle innovation?

Assistive Technology – How can we promote interoperability?

Accessibility for People with Cognitive Disabilities – How do we meet their needs?

Usability of the Standard and Guidelines – How can we make technical requirements clear?

What Else?

1. General Technical Requirements

Subpart C: Technical Provisions

6. Additional Requirements for Real-Time Voice Conversation Functionality

5. Requirements for Audio and/or Video Content

4. Additional Requirements for Audio-Visual Players or Displays

3. Requirements for User Interface and Electronic Content

2. Requirements for Hardware Aspects of Products

7. Additional Requirements for Authoring Tools

The Recommendations

Page 4: Is 2012 "Accessibility Armageddon" for Technical Communicators

CLIENT Research

the paciello group

TEITAC Results (1 of 2)

Combined federal mandate requirements for 255/508

More provisions, but more testable and largely harmonized with other standards

Technical Provisions and Functional Performance Criteria (FPCs)

Structure and strength of recommendation recommended provisions provisions without consensus “best practices” notes, for Access Board or implementers

© 2012 by The Paciello Group, LLC. All rights reserved. Proprietary and Confidential.

Page 5: Is 2012 "Accessibility Armageddon" for Technical Communicators

CLIENT Research

the paciello group

TEITAC Results (2 of 2)

“Product characteristics” rather than “product categories” “Real-time Voice Conversation Functionality”, not “Telephone systems”

Software, Web, other content, and interface behavior now largely converged into “User Interface and Electronic Content”

Web is now an application platform actual user requirements virtually the same as desktop software

© 2011 by The Paciello Group, LLC. All rights reserved. Proprietary and Confidential.

Page 6: Is 2012 "Accessibility Armageddon" for Technical Communicators

CLIENT Research

the paciello group

21st Century Communications & Video Accessibility Act

Purpose To ensure that individuals with disabilities have access to emerging Internet Protocol-based

communication and video programming technologies in the 21st century.

What it does: Requires that mobile and other Internet-based telecommunications devices have

accessible user interfaces, and offer people with disabilities use of a full range of text messaging and other popular services that are currently largely inaccessible;

Restores the FCC’s video description rules and grants them the authority to expand such regulations, and require emergency announcements and similar information to be accessible to people with disabilities through audible presentation of on-screen alerts,

Ensures that video programming offered via the Internet will be described, and call for all devices that receive and playback video programming to employ accessible user interfaces and allow ready access to description; and

Strengthen consumers’ ability to enforce their rights to Communications and Video accessibility through the establishment of a clearinghouse of information about service and equipment accessibility and usability, a meaningful FCC complaint process that holds industry accountable for their accessibility obligations, and judicial review of FCC action to ensure the Commission’s own accountability.

© 2012 by The Paciello Group, LLC. All rights reserved. Proprietary and Confidential.

Page 7: Is 2012 "Accessibility Armageddon" for Technical Communicators

CLIENT Research

the paciello group

Web Accessibility

Captions & Video Description (Theaters)

Next Generation 9-1-1

More information: www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2010/July/10-crt-850.htmlwww.ada.gov/anprm2010.htmwww.regulations.gov

DOJ’s Proposed ADA Areas of Regulation

© 2012 by The Paciello Group, LLC. All rights reserved. Proprietary and Confidential.

Page 8: Is 2012 "Accessibility Armageddon" for Technical Communicators

WCAG 2.0 International Web Accessibility Standard Formal W3C Specification, Dec. 2008 Organized around the following 4 principles:

◦ Perceivable◦ Operable◦ Understandable◦ Robust

Each principle has guidelines Each guideline has testable, success criteria

WCAG 2.0 compliance is the foundation for 255, 508, CVAA, and ADA

Copyright The Paciello Group 2012©

Page 9: Is 2012 "Accessibility Armageddon" for Technical Communicators

Concluding Thoughts / Q&A Points for Discussion

• Cloud, mobile platforms• Business ROI• Enforcement• Certification• RIA, HTML5, app accessibility• AT/IT interoperability

Questions? Thoughts?

One should be able to see that things are hopeless yet be determined to make them otherwise…”

- F. Scott FitzgeraldCopyright The Paciello Group 2012©