Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Global Graphics company confidential. Copyright © Global Graphics Software Limited, 2012.
Global Graphics So.ware
performance made simple
Global Graphics company confidential. Copyright © Global Graphics Software Limited, 2012.
Key Performance Features of Jaws 3.0: • Uses all available Cores, up to 16 on the system.
• For PDF workflows, the page-‐independence of PDF allows Jaws 3 to process mulKple pages from a PDF in parallel.
• Internal threading speeds processor intense operaKons like transparency blending and color space conversion.
• Jaws 3 can be configured to process mulKple jobs at in parallel.
• Updated transparency Kling contributes to faster transparency processing.
• When enabled, Jaws 3’s opKonal pre-‐displaylist downsampling reduces image processing load.
• Job profiling eliminates many of the Jaws 2002.6 boRlenecks.
• Our new 64-‐Bit memory manager maximizes benefits of using newer 64-‐bit operaKng systems.
• The addiKon of Dynamic Memory AllocaKon means that Jaws 3 adjusts to the dynamic memory needs of modern workflows.
Jaws 3.0 – Performance Features
Global Graphics company confidential. Copyright © Global Graphics Software Limited, 2012.
Jaws 3.0 vs. Jaws 2002.6 – Performance
Test results:
0 20 40 60 80
100 120 140
Jaws 2002.6 Jaws 3.0
Simple One Page PDF Files
Time in Secon
ds
Notes: 1. All tesKng on dual quad-‐core system with 16Gbyte memory running Windows 7 Professional. 2. Output to 600dpi TIFF. 3. Color management in use. 4. No transparency. 5. Test performed using customer supplied files.
Global Graphics company confidential. Copyright © Global Graphics Software Limited, 2012.
Jaws 3.0 vs. Jaws 2002.6 – Performance
Test results:
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
Jaws 2002.6 Jaws 3.0
Transparency Performance
Time in Secon
ds
Notes: 1. All tesKng on dual quad-‐core system with 16Gbyte memory running Windows 7 Professional. 2. Output to 600dpi TIFF. 3. Color management in use. 4. All files with transparency included in these results. 5. Files had 1-‐4 pages. 6. Test performed using customer supplied files.
Global Graphics company confidential. Copyright © Global Graphics Software Limited, 2012.
Jaws 3.0 vs. Jaws 2002.6 – Performance
Test results:
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
Jaws 2002.6 Jaws 3.0
PDF Files with 100s of Pages
Time in Secon
ds
Notes: 1. All tesKng on dual quad-‐core system with 16Gbyte memory running Windows 7 Professional. 2. Output to 600dpi TIFF. 3. Color management in use. 4. There were no files in this set with transparency. 5. Jobs were mixed text and images. 6. Fewest pages was 216. Most was 1332. 7. Test performed using customer supplied files.
Global Graphics company confidential. Copyright © Global Graphics Software Limited, 2012.
Jaws 3.0 vs. Jaws 2002.6 – Performance
Test results:
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
Jaws 2002.6 Jaws 3.0
Overall Performance
Time in Secon
ds
Notes: 1. All tesKng on dual quad-‐core system with 16Gbyte memory running Windows 7 Professional. 2. Output to 600dpi TIFF. 3. Color management in use. 4. Test performed using customer supplied files.
Global Graphics company confidential. Copyright © Global Graphics Software Limited, 2012.
Jaws 3.0 – Performance Summary
• Most files see performance improvement in Jaws 3.0
• Good performance with simple one page PDF files is maintained even with the added kernel acKvity working with mulKple threads.
• PDF files with many pages benefit from the parallel page processing.
• PDF files with transparency benefit from mulK-‐threading and automaKc transparency Kle size adjustments.
• All files benefit from improved memory management.
Global Graphics company confidential. Copyright © Global Graphics Software Limited, 2012.
Q and A
