18
From Records To Statements Taking the Leap

Managing statements

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Presentation at ALA Midwinter Dallas at the Cataloging Norms IG. Describes the differences between management at the record level and at the statement level.

Citation preview

Page 1: Managing statements

From Records To Statements

Taking the Leap

Page 2: Managing statements

ALA Dallas, 1/20/122

What’s different about

statement data?

Library data compliance has been defined by consensus since MARC was a pup

But outside the MARC silo we need different strategies

To accomplish this we need to look at value, costs and investments very differently

Flickr photo by Robert Jagendorf

Page 3: Managing statements

ALA Dallas, 1/20/123

What Are Statements?

• A MARC record can be viewed as an aggregation of statements• All the attribute = value pairs relate to the same

resource

• In a linked data world, statements are dis-aggregated and each carries the relationship to a resource as the ‘subject’ of each triple

• Though it seems more complicated to deal with statements in isolation, it is really simpler (the complications are that we know little about it)

Page 4: Managing statements

ALA Dallas, 1/20/124

Future Metadata Strategies

• Statement level rather than record level management

• Records as units of transport rather than units of management

• Emphasis on evaluation coming in and provenance going out

• Shift in human effort from creating standard cataloging to careful human intervention in machine-based processes

• Extensive use of data created outside libraries

• Intelligent re-use of our legacy data

Page 5: Managing statements

ALA Dallas, 1/20/125

http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/ojs/pubs/article/view/770/766

Managing Statements

Page 6: Managing statements

ALA Dallas, 1/20/126

[Possible] New Roles for Librarians

• Aggregators of relevant metadata content• Developing methods to expose & redistribute

without a central node

• Modeling and documenting best practices in metadata creation, improvement and exposure• Application profiles important in this effort

• Developers of vocabularies using bibliographic relationships

• Innovators in using social networks to enhance bibliographic description

Page 7: Managing statements

ALA Dallas, 1/20/127

Re-Thinking MetadataManagement

Page 8: Managing statements

ALA Dallas, 1/20/128

Page 9: Managing statements

ALA Dallas, 1/20/129

Harvest/Ingest Plan

• Choosing data sources• There are known sources out there, some of

them are of good quality, others are usable, with improvement

• Tools are needed to help pull data, validate it, cache it, and set it up for evaluation• Most of these tasks can/should be set up with

automated processes, with alerts to human minders when something goes wrong

Page 10: Managing statements

ALA Dallas, 1/20/1210

Page 11: Managing statements

ALA Dallas, 1/20/1211

Metadata Evaluation

• Evaluation needs to scale well beyond random sampling

• Statistical and data mining tools need to be brought into the process, to provide both ‘overview’ and specifics of whole data sets

• Improvement specifications, techniques, quality criteria and tools need to be iterative, granular, and shareable

Page 12: Managing statements

ALA Dallas, 1/20/1212

Page 13: Managing statements

ALA Dallas, 1/20/1213

Testing, Monitoring & Re-evaluation

• Data will change, and processes must be able to detect that, based on data profiles• Human intervention should be limited

• Tools need to be built so that non-programmers can run them• Reading logs, monitoring error reports, checking

results, writing specs, can/should be done by data specialists (a.k.a. catalogers w/training)

• Looking for opportunities for programmers and catalogers to learn together is essential

Page 14: Managing statements

ALA Dallas, 1/20/1214

Page 15: Managing statements

ALA Dallas, 1/20/1215

Re-distribution Plan

• If we improve data, we need to expose how we did it (and what we did), for the use of downstream consumers• New metadata provenance efforts designed to do

this at the statement level

• This strategy can only exist successfully where open licenses allow innovation and wide re-use

• Ideally, distribution AND redistribution should be accomplished with Application Profiles

Page 16: Managing statements

ALA Dallas, 1/20/1216

Will This Shift Cost Too Much?

• It’s the human effort that costs us• Cost of traditional cataloging is far too high, for

increasingly dubious value

• Our current investments have reached the end of their usefulness• All the possible efficiencies for traditional cataloging have

already been accomplished

• Waiting for leadership from the big players costs us valuable time with no guarantees of results

• We need to figure out how to invest in more distributed innovation and focused collaboration

Page 17: Managing statements

ALA Dallas, 1/20/1217

ROI in the LOD World

• Free metadata is essential in a ‘culture economy’• We need eyeballs, attention, connection for our

content!

• Thinking about ROI based on recovering the cost of creating metadata is a dead end

• To drive people to your content, you need to put your data out there• But once it’s there, it’s out of your control, and we

need to get comfortable with that

Page 18: Managing statements

Thank you! Questions?

Contact info: [email protected]

Metadata Matters: http://managemetadata.com/blog

ALA Dallas, 1/20/12 18