72
Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM Nikita Tarakanov Security Center of Excellence Oleksandr Bazhaniuk, Yuriy Bulygin, Andrew Furtak, Mikhail Gorobets, John Loucaides, Alexander Matrosov, Mickey Shkatov Advanced Threat Research (www.intelsecurity.com/atr ) Positive Hack Days 2015 Moscow, Russia

Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Nikita TarakanovSecurity Center of Excellence

Oleksandr Bazhaniuk, Yuriy Bulygin, Andrew Furtak, Mikhail Gorobets, John Loucaides, Alexander Matrosov, Mickey Shkatov

Advanced Threat Research (www.intelsecurity.com/atr)

Positive Hack Days 2015

Moscow, Russia

Page 2: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Agenda

• Introduction

• Memory Corruption: Ring3 -> Ring0

• Memory Corruption: Ring0 -> SMM

• Q&A

Page 3: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Introduction

• Ring3(IE, Adobe Reader, Flash player, MS Office etc) applications as first attack vector• Not privileged level• Sandboxes (IE EPM, Reader sandbox, Chrome sandbox etc)• Need to get Ring0 to have ability to make fancy stuff• So, Elevation of Privileges (R3->R0) Exploits/Vulnerabilities are critical• Good examples: pwn2own 2013/2014 IE EPM sandbox escapes via

kernel exploit• Ring0 is powerful, but there is more privileged mode - SMM

Page 4: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Memory Corruption: Ring3 -> Ring0

Page 5: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Memory Corruption types: Ring3 -> Ring0

• Stack-based buffer overflow – rare, out-of-scope

• Pool overflow

• Arbitrary memory corruption

Page 6: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Memory Corruption: Ring0 mitigations

• Various security checks: Stack-canary, Pool metadata integrity checks

• KASLR

• SMEP

• SMAP

Page 7: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Memory Corruption: Pool overflow

Page 8: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Techniques to exploit pool overflows

• Pool metadata corruption

• Object metadata corruption (DKOHM)

• Object Type Confusion (DKOHM + DKOM)

Page 9: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Object Metadata

• OBJECT_HEADER

• Optional headers

POOL_HEADER

Optional Headers

OBJECT_HEADER

Object

Page 10: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

OBJECT_HEADER

• • kd> dt nt!_OBJECT_HEADER• • +0x000 PointerCount : Int4B • • +0x004 HandleCount : Int4B • • +0x004 NextToFree : Ptr32 Void • • +0x008 Lock : _EX_PUSH_LOCK • • +0x00c TypeIndex : UChar <- Index of pointer to OBJECT_TYPE structure in ObTypeIndexTable• • +0x00d TraceFlags : UChar • • +0x00d DbgRefTrace : Pos 0, 1 Bit • • +0x00d DbgTracePermanent : Pos 1, 1 Bit • • +0x00e InfoMask : UChar • • +0x00f Flags : UChar • • +0x010 ObjectCreateInfo : Ptr32 _OBJECT_CREATE_INFORMATION • • +0x010 QuotaBlockCharged : Ptr32 Void • • +0x014 SecurityDescriptor : Ptr32 Void • • +0x018 Body : _QUAD

Page 11: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

ObTypeIndexTable

• • kd> dd nt!ObTypeIndexTable L40• • 81a3edc0 00000000 bad0b0b0 8499c040 849aa390 • • 81a3edd0 84964f70 8499b4c0 84979500 84999618 • • 81a3ede0 84974868 849783c8 8499bf70 84970b40 • • 81a3edf0 849a8888 84979340 849aaf70 849a6a38 • • 81a3ee00 8496df70 8495b040 8498cf70 84930a50 • • 81a3ee10 8495af70 8497ff70 84985040 84999e78 • • 81a3ee20 84997f70 8496c040 849646e0 84978f70 • • 81a3ee30 8497aec0 84972608 849a0040 849a9750 • • 81a3ee40 849586d8 84984f70 8499d578 849ab040 • • 81a3ee50 84958938 84974a58 84967168 84967098 • • 81a3ee60 8496ddd0 849a5140 8497ce40 849aa138 • • 81a3ee70 84a6c058 84969c58 8497e720 85c62a28 • • 81a3ee80 85c625f0 00000000 00000000 00000000

Page 12: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

OBJECT_TYPE

• kd> dt nt!_OBJECT_TYPE• +0x000 TypeList : _LIST_ENTRY• +0x008 Name : _UNICODE_STRING• +0x010 DefaultObject : Ptr32 Void• +0x014 Index : UChar• +0x018 TotalNumberOfObjects : Uint4B• +0x01c TotalNumberOfHandles : Uint4B• +0x020 HighWaterNumberOfObjects : Uint4B• +0x024 HighWaterNumberOfHandles : Uint4B• +0x028 TypeInfo : _OBJECT_TYPE_INITIALIZER• +0x080 TypeLock : _EX_PUSH_LOCK• +0x084 Key : Uint4B• +0x088 CallbackList : _LIST_ENTRY

Page 13: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Procedures

• kd> dt nt!_OBJECT_TYPE_INITIALIZER• [..]• +0x030 DumpProcedure : Ptr32 void • +0x034 OpenProcedure : Ptr32 long • +0x038 CloseProcedure : Ptr32 void • +0x03c DeleteProcedure : Ptr32 void • +0x040 ParseProcedure : Ptr32 long • +0x044 SecurityProcedure : Ptr32 long • +0x048 QueryNameProcedure : Ptr32 long • +0x04c OkayToCloseProcedure : Ptr32 unsigned char

Page 14: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

ObTypeIndexTable & Object Type

Object HeaderTypeIndex

Pointer to OBJECT_TYPE

ObTypeIndexTable OBJECT_TYPE

Pointers to various procedures

Object’s dispatch function

Page 15: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Object Type Index Table (x86)

Page 16: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Object Type Index Table (x64)

Page 17: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Object metadata corruption (DKOHM)

POOL_HEADER

Optional Headers

OBJECT_HEADER

Object

overflow

ObTypeIndexTable

0x00000000

0xBAD0B0B0Fake OBJECT_TYPE

Shellcode

Page 18: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Windows 8.1

• 0xBAD0B0B0 has gone

Page 19: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Object Type Confusion (DKOHM + DKOM)

• Set TypeIndex value to different object type (object type confusion)

• Object Manager is fooled (before it was Type A, not it’s Type B)

• Craft malicious object’s data (counters, pointers)

• Invoke system service(s) to trigger access to malicious object

• Profit

Page 20: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Object data corruption (DKOHM + DKOM)

Object Header

Object Data

ObTypeIndexTable

FILE OBJECT_TYPE

ALPC OBJECT_TYPE

Page 21: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Object data corruption (DKOHM+DKOM)

Object Header FILE_OBJECT

Object Header ALPC_OBJECT(all data is under control)

exploit

Invoke system service trigger access to object

Different scenarios

After overwrite -> type confusion

Page 22: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

OBJECT_TYPE_INITIALIZER Procedures• +0x030 DumpProcedure : (null) • +0x038 OpenProcedure : (null) • +0x040 CloseProcedure : 0xfffff801`5b913b44 void nt!

ObpCloseDirectoryObject+0• +0x048 DeleteProcedure : 0xfffff801`5b92743c void nt!

ObpDeleteDirectoryObject+0• +0x050 ParseProcedure : (null) • +0x058 SecurityProcedure : 0xfffff801`5b848e54 long nt!

SeDefaultObjectMethod+0• +0x060 QueryNameProcedure : (null) • +0x068 OkayToCloseProcedure : (null)

Page 23: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

OBJECT_TYPE_INITIALIZER Procedures• +0x030 DumpProcedure : (null) • +0x038 OpenProcedure : (null) • +0x040 CloseProcedure : (null) • +0x048 DeleteProcedure : 0xfffff801`5b9250fc void nt!IopDeleteDevice+0• +0x050 ParseProcedure : 0xfffff801`5b86dde0 long nt!IopParseDevice+0• +0x058 SecurityProcedure : 0xfffff801`5b842028 long nt!

IopGetSetSecurityObject+0• +0x060 QueryNameProcedure : (null) • +0x068 OkayToCloseProcedure : (null)

Page 24: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Object Type Confusion

Object Header Event Object

Object Header FILE_OBJECT(all data is under control)

exploit nt!IopGetSetSecurityObject

NtQuerySecurityObject

After overwrite -> type confusion

nt!SeDefaultObjectMethod

Page 25: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

SecurityProcedure vector

• For most object types: nt!SeDefaultObjectMethod

• WmiGuid object type: nt!WmipSecurityMethod

• File/Device object type: nt!IopGetSetSecurityObject

• Key object type: nt!CmpSecurityMethod

Page 26: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

nt!IopGetSetSecurityObject

• FILE_OBJECT -> DEVICE_OBJECT -> DRIVER_OBJECT

-> MAJOR_ROUTINE -> attacker’s shellcode

• Execution Hijack by three consequent dereferences!!!!

Page 27: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

nt!IopGetSetSecurityObject

Page 28: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

nt!IopGetSetSecurityObject chain

• 0: kd> dt nt!_FILE_OBJECT• +0x000 Type : Int2B• +0x002 Size : Int2B• +0x008 DeviceObject : Ptr64 _DEVICE_OBJECT• 0: kd> dt nt!_DEVICE_OBJECT• +0x000 Type : Int2B• +0x002 Size : Uint2B• +0x004 ReferenceCount : Int4B• +0x008 DriverObject : Ptr64 _DRIVER_OBJECT

Page 29: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

nt!IopGetSetSecurityObject chain

• 0: kd> dt nt!_DRIVER_OBJECT• +0x000 Type : Int2B• +0x002 Size : Int2B• +0x008 DeviceObject : Ptr64 _DEVICE_OBJECT• +0x010 Flags : Uint4B• +0x018 DriverStart : Ptr64 Void• +0x020 DriverSize : Uint4B• +0x028 DriverSection : Ptr64 Void• +0x030 DriverExtension : Ptr64 _DRIVER_EXTENSION• +0x038 DriverName : _UNICODE_STRING• +0x048 HardwareDatabase : Ptr64 _UNICODE_STRING• +0x050 FastIoDispatch : Ptr64 _FAST_IO_DISPATCH• +0x058 DriverInit : Ptr64 long • +0x060 DriverStartIo : Ptr64 void • +0x068 DriverUnload : Ptr64 void • +0x070 MajorFunction : [28] Ptr64 long

Page 30: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Close/Delete Procedure vector

• Huge amount of different execution flows: 56 functions

• Mostly arbitrary memory overwrite

• Some adjacent read/write

• Some hijack of execution flow

Page 31: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Other Procedures

• DumpProcedure, OpenProcedure, ParseProcedure,

QueryNameProcedure, OkayToCloseProcedure

• Are rare – no interest in here

Page 32: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Object’s body vector (DKOM)

• There are several typical OOP interfaces• Constructor – NtCreate* (NtCreateFile)• Destructor – NtClose• Getter – NtQueryInformation* (NtQueryInformationWorkerFactory)• Setter – NtSetInformation* (NtSetInformationKey)• Object Type specific: NtClearEvent, NtAlpcAcceptConnectPort,

NtEnumerateValueKey, NtRecoverResourceManager etc

Page 33: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

DKOHM+DKOM restrictions

• Unfortunately you cant freely use Getter/Setter/Specific when you change type of an object – caused by ValidAccessMask field • +0x010 Name : _UNICODE_STRING "WindowStation“• +0x01c ValidAccessMask : 0xf037f

• +0x010 Name : _UNICODE_STRING "Directory“• +0x01c ValidAccessMask : 0xf000f

• But you can still smash object’s data without changing object type

Page 34: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

DKOHM+DKOM restrictions

• Some Object Types have same ValidAccessMask• +0x010 Name : _UNICODE_STRING "Section“• +0x01c ValidAccessMask : 0x1f001f

• +0x010 Name : _UNICODE_STRING "Job“• +0x01c ValidAccessMask : 0x1f001f

• So technique using Getter/Setter/Specific is possible, but limited

Page 35: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Symbolic Link: Getter vector NtQuerySymbolicLinkObject

Page 36: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Directory Object: Getter vector NtQueryDirectoryObject• Up-to 0x25 times of reading arbitrary memory

Page 37: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

WorkerFactory object Getter:NtQueryInformationWorkerFactory

Page 38: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

WorkerFactory object Setter:NtSetInformationWorkerFactory

Page 39: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Memory Corruption: Ring3 -> Ring0

• So we have all primitives:

• Arbitrary Memory Overwrite -> store payload in kernel executable memory

• Arbitrary Memory Read -> KASLR bypass

• Arbitrary Code Execution -> execution with Ring0 privileges

Page 40: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Memory Corruption: Ring0 -> SMM

Page 41: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

System Management Mode (SMM)

• System Management Interrupt (SMI)• CPU (OS) state is saved in SMRAM upon entry to SMM and restored upon exit from SMM• SMI handlers are invoked by CPU upon System Management Interrupt (SMI) from chipset or other logical CPUs and

execute in System Management Mode (SMM) of x86 CPU• SMI handlers return to the OS using RSM instruction

• SMRAM is a range of DRAM reserved by BIOS SMI handlers• Protected from software and device acces

Page 42: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

System Management Interrupt (SMI) Handlers

SMRR_PHYSBASE

SMRAM

0x00000000

0xFFFFFFFF

SMI handlers

SMM state save area

SMBASE + 8000h

SMBASE

SMBASE + FFFFh

SMRAM

Page 43: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

System Management Interrupt (SMI) Handlers• SMM handler execution environment:• At entry, CS = SMBASE (0x30000 at reset), EIP=0x8000• Addressable physical space from 0 to 0xFFFFFFFFh (4G) • No paging• All hardware interrupts are disabled

SMM Core dispatcherSMI

SMST

CPU info

Memory info

I/O info

SMM Driver

SMM Driver

SMM Driver

SMM callback

SMM callback

SMM callback...

RSM

SMM code flow

Page 44: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Trigger ‘SW’ SMI via APMC I/O Port• _swsmi PROC• ..

• ; setting up GPR (arguments) to SMI handler call• ; AX gets overwritten by _smi_code_data (which is passed in RCX)• ; DX gets overwritten by the value of APMC port (= 0x00B2)• mov rax, rdx ; rax_value• mov ax, cx ; smi_code_data• mov rdx, r10 ; rdx_value• mov dx, 0B2h ; APMC SMI control port 0xB2

• mov rbx, r8 ; rbx_value• mov rcx, r9 ; rcx_value• mov rsi, r11 ; rsi_value• mov rdi, r12 ; rdi_value

• ; write smi_code_data value to SW SMI control/data ports (0xB2/0xB3)• out dx, ax

• ..• ret

• _swsmi ENDP

Page 45: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Trigger ‘SW’ SMI using CHIPSEC• From command line:

• # chipsec_util.py smi smic smid [RAX RBX RCX RDX RSI RDI]

• From any module in CHIPSEC:

• self.intr = chipsec.hal.Interrupts( self.cs )

• self.intr.send_SW_SMI(smic,smid,rax,rbx,rcx,rdx,rsi,rdi)

Page 46: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Known SMI Vulnerabilities

Page 47: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Known Vulnerabilities Related to SMM

• Issue• When D_LCK is not set by BIOS, SMM space decode can be

changed to open access to CSEG when CPU is not in SMM: Using CPU SMM to Circumvent OS Security Functions

• Also Using SMM For Other Purposes• Mitigation• D_LCK bit locks down Compatible SMM space (a.k.a. CSEG)

configuration (SMRAMC)• SMRAMC[D_OPEN]=0 forces access to legacy SMM space

decode to system bus rather than to DRAM where SMI handlers are when CPU is not in System Management Mode (SMM)

• Check• chipsec_main –-module common.smm

Unlocked Compatible/Legacy SMRAM

Page 48: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Known Vulnerabilities Related to SMM

• Issue• CPU executes from cache if memory type is cacheable• Ring0 exploit can make SMRAM cacheable (variable MTRR)• Ring0 exploit can then populate cache-lines at SMBASE with SMI

exploit code (ex. modify SMBASE) and trigger SMI• CPU upon entering SMM will execute SMI exploit from cache• Attacking SMM Memory via Intel Cache Poisoning• Getting Into the SMRAM: SMM Reloaded

• Mitigation• CPU System Management Range Registers (SMRR) forcing UC and

blocking access to SMRAM when CPU is not in SMM• Check• chipsec_main –-module common.smrr

SMRAM “Cache Poisoning” Attacks

Page 49: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Legacy SMI Handlers Calling Out of SMRAM

• OS level exploit stores payload in F-segment below 1MB (0xF8070 Physical Address)

• Exploit has to also reprogram PAM for F-segment• Then triggers “SW SMI” via APMC port (I/O 0xB2)• SMI handler does CALL 0F000:08070 in SMM

• BIOS SMM Privilege Escalation Vulnerabilities (14 issues in just one SMI Handler)

• System Management Mode Design and Security Issues

Branch Outside of SMRAM

Page 50: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Legacy SMI Handlers Calling Out of SMRAM

Phys MemorySMRAM

CALL F000:8070

Legacy BIOS Shadow(F/ E-segments)

PA = 0xF0000

1 MB

Page 51: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Legacy SMI Handlers Calling Out of SMRAM

Phys MemorySMRAM

CALL F000:8070

Legacy BIOS Shadow(F/ E-segments)

PA = 0xF0000

1 MB

Code fetchin SMM

Page 52: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Legacy SMI Handlers Calling Out of SMRAM

Phys MemorySMRAM

CALL F000:8070

Legacy BIOS Shadow(F/ E-segments)

PA = 0xF0000

1 MB

0xF8070: payload0F000:08070 = 0xF8070 PA

Code fetchin SMM

Page 53: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Function Pointers Outside of SMRAM (DXE SMI)

Phys Memory

SMRAM

mov ACPINV+x, %rax

call *0x18(%rax)

ACPI NV Area

payload

1. Read function pointer from ACPI NVS memory (outside SMRAM)

Pointer to payload 2. Call function pointer (payload outside SMRAM)

Attacking Intel BIOS

Page 54: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Mitigating SMM “Call-Outs”

• These issues are specific to particular SMI Handler implementation…• static analysis of binary?• run-time debugging?

• CPU Hardware Support (starting in Haswell)• SMM Code Access Check

• SMM_Code_Chk_En (SMM-RW)• This control bit is available onlyif MSR_SMM_MCA_CAP[58] == 1. • When set to ‘0’ (default) none of the logical processors are prevented from executing SMM

code outside the ranges defined by the SMRR. • When set to ‘1’ any logical processor in the package that attempts to execute SMM code not

within the ranges defined by the SMRR will assert an unrecoverable MCE.• Attempts to execute code outside SMRAM while inside SMM result in a Machine Check

Exception!

Page 55: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Legacy SMI Handlers Calling Out of SMRAM

Phys MemorySMRAM

CALL F000:8070

Legacy BIOS Shadow(F/ E-segments)

PA = 0xF0000

1 MB

0xF8070: payload0F000:08070 = 0xF8070 PA

Code fetchin SMM – causes Machine Check Exception

Page 56: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Function Pointers Outside of SMRAM (DXE SMI)

Phys MemorySMRAM

mov ACPINV+x, %rax

call *0x18(%rax)

ACPI NV Area

payload

1. Read function pointer from ACPI NVS memory (outside SMRAM)

Pointer to payload 2. Call function pointer (payload outside SMRAM) -- causes MCE!

Page 57: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

A new class of vulnerabilities in SMI handlers

Page 58: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Pointer Arguments to SMI HandlersPhys Memory

SMI Handlers in SMRAM

OS Memory

SMI Handler writes result to a buffer at address passed in RBX…

RAX (code)

RBX (pointer)

RCX (function)

RDX

RSI

RDI

SMI handler specific structure

SMI

Page 59: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Pointer VulnerabilitiesPhys Memory

SMI Handlers in SMRAM

OS Memory

Exploit tricks SMI handler to write to an address inside SMRAM

RAX (code)

RBX (pointer)

RCX (function)

RDX

RSI

RDI

Fake structure inside SMRAM

SMI

Page 60: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

What to overwrite inside SMRAM?• Depending on the vulnerability, caller may control address to write, the value written, or both.

• Often the caller controls the address but doesn’t have control over the values written to the address by the SMI handler

• In our example the attacker controls the address and does not control the value:

The SMI handler writes 0 value to the specified address

Page 61: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

What to overwrite inside SMRAM?• What can an exploit overwrite in SMRAM without crashing?• SMI Handler code starting at SMBASE + 8000h• Internal SMI handler’s state/flags inside SMRAM• Contents of SMM state save area at SMBASE + FC00h, where the CPU

state is stored on SMM entry

Page 62: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

What to overwrite inside SMRAM? • Current value of SMBASE MSR is also saved in SMM state save area by CPU at offset SMBASE + FEF8h upon SMI

• Stored value of SMBASE is restored upon executing RSM

• SMBASE relocation: SMI handler may change the saved value of SMBASE in order to change the location of SMRAM upon next SMI

• The idea:Move SMBASE to a new, unprotected location by changing the SMBASE value stored in the SMM state save area.

Page 63: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

How do we know where to write?SMM state save is at SMBASE + FC00h

But SMBASE is not known• SMBASE MSR can be read only in SMM• SMBASE is different per CPU thread• SMBASE is different per BIOS implementation

SMBASE should be programmed at some offset from TSEG/SMRR_PHYSBASE

Page 64: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

How do we know where to write?1. Dump contents of SMRAM• Use hardware debugger• Use similar “pointer read” vulnerability• Use another vulnerability (e.g. S3 boot script) to disable SMRAM DMA

protection and use DMA via graphics aperture to read SMRAM And in the dump look for SMI handler entry point code Known values in GP registers (invoke SMI with these values before dump)

2. Read SPI flash memory & RE initialization code to find SMBASE there.3. Guess location of SMBASE:• SMBASE = SMRR_PHYSBASE• SMBASE = SMRR_PHYSBASE - 8000h (SMRR_PHYSBASE at SMI handler location)• Blind iteration through all offsets within SMRAM as potential saved SMBASE

value

Page 65: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

How does the attack work?Phys Memory

SMI Handler

OS Memory

• CPU stores current value of SMBASE in SMM save state area on SMI and restores it on RSM

RAX (code)

RBX (pointer)

RCX (function)

SMI handler specific structure

SMI

SMBASE

SMM State Save AreaSaved SMBASE value

SMI Entry Point (SMBASE + 8000h)

Page 66: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

How does the attack work?Phys Memory

SMI Handler

OS Memory

• Attacker prepares fake SMRAM with new SMI handler outside of SMRAM at some address (PA 0) that will be a new SMBASE

Fake SMI handler

SMBASE

Saved SMBASE value SMM State Save Area

SMI Entry Point (SMBASE + 8000h)

Page 67: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

How does the attack work?Phys Memory

SMI Handler

OS Memory

• Attacker triggers SMI w/ RBX pointing to saved SMBASE address in SMRAM• SMI handler overwrites saved SMBASE on exploit’s behalf with address of fake

SMBASE (e.g. 0 PA)

RAX (code)

RBX (pointer)

RCX (function)

SMI

SMBASE

Fake SMI handler

Saved SMBASE value SMM State Save Area

SMI Entry Point (SMBASE + 8000h)

Page 68: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

How does the attack work?Phys Memory

SMI Handler

OS Memory

• Attacker triggers another SMI• CPU executes fake SMI handler at new entry point outside of original protected

SMRAM because SMBASE location changed

SMI

SMBASE

Fake SMI handler

Saved SMBASE value SMM State Save Area

New SMI Entry Point

Page 69: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

How does the attack work?

• Fake SMI handler disables original SMRAM protection (disables SMRR)• Then restores original SMBASE value to switch back to original SMRAM

Phys Memory

SMI Handler(SMRAM is not protected)

OS Memory

SMBASE

Fake SMI handler

SMM State Save Area

New SMI Entry Point

SMI Handler(SMRAM is not protected)

Original saved SMBASE value

Page 70: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

How does the attack work?Phys Memory

SMI Handler(SMRAM is not protected)

OS Memory

• The SMRAM is restored but not protected by HW anymore• The SMI handler may be modified by attacker as well as other SMRAM data

SMBASE

SMI Entry Point (SMBASE + 8000h)

Page 71: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Demo

Page 72: Memory Corruption: from sandbox to SMM

Q&A

• Thank you!