FloorCast MVP2 & DATA PRESENTATION

COURTNEY RING, CLAY BEYERS, WESLEY HOWELL, MELISSA KANTOR

MVP2 OBJECTIVES ‣  Increase usability ‣  Intuitiveness ‣  Readability ‣  Accuracy & stability

‣  Introduce new features ‣  Additional data analysis

DEMO FLOORCAST MVP2

USER TESTING: METHOD

▸  App introduction & discovery

▸  Structured discovery

▸  User-directed discovery

▸  Search for a seat in library using app

USER 1 RESULTS Jay, Senior (Mechanical Engineering), user-directed & search

Importance Satisfaction Find a study space 4 4

Display (readability) 5 5 Easy operation (intuitiveness)

5 4

Accuracy & stability 5 4 Other features -- --

Library selection (home screen)

4 2

Floor statistics & design 5 5 Averages graph 5 4

Region statistics & design 4 4 Overall Product 4 5 User comments “It was easy for me to find a seat because the library is

relatively empty in the morning… I guess it helped me know which regions to avoid on each floor.”

USER 2 RESULTS

Importance Satisfaction Find a study space 5 4

Display (readability) 4 3

Easy operation (intuitiveness)

4 4

Accuracy & stability 4 4

Other features -- -- Library selection (home

screen) 5 2

Floor statistics &design 5 5

Averages graph 5 4 Region statistics & design 4 5

Overall Product 5 4 User comments “This page looks amazing. So dope. And the fact that it

actually works, so dope”

Nell, Senior (Biophysics & Astrophysics), structured discovery

USER 3 RESULTS

Importance Satisfaction Find a study space 5 3

Display (readability) 2 3 Easy operation (intuitiveness)

2 4

Accuracy & stability 4 4 Other features -- --

Library selection (home screen)

2 1

Floor statistics &design 4 3 Averages graph 4 4

Region statistics & design 3 5 Overall Product 4 5 User comments “Loved that you had hours, address and phone number of

library…” “Confusing why when I pressed the Dude/Hatcher I was

still directed to Shapiro....” “Some of the buttons looked less ‘high tech’ or advanced

than other features”

Erin, Junior (BBA), user-directed discovery

USER 4 RESULTS

Importance Satisfaction Find a study space 5 4

Display (readability) 3 4

Easy operation (intuitiveness)

3 4

Accuracy & stability 3 4

Other features -- -- Library selection (home

screen) 4 4

Floor statistics & design 5 5

Averages graph 5 5 Region statistics & design 2 4

Overall Product 4 4 User comments

Kendall, Sophomore (Communications), structured discovery & search

USER 5 RESULTS

Importance Satisfaction Find a study space 3 4

Display (readability) 4 4 Easy operation (intuitiveness)

4 4

Accuracy & stability 5 5 Other features -- --

Library selection (home screen)

5 3

Floor statistics &design 5 5 Averages graph 4 4

Region statistics & design 2 2 Overall Product 5 5 User comments

Andrew, Freshman (undecided), structured discovery

MVP2 USER TESTING RESULTS Importance Satisfaction

Find a study space 4.4 4.8 Display (readability) 3.6 3.8

Easy operation (intuitiveness) 3.6 4.0

Accuracy & stability 4.2 4.2 Other features -- --

Library selection (home screen) 4 2.4

Floor statistics & design 4.6 4.4 Averages graph 4.6 4.2

Region statistics & design 3 4 Overall Product 4.4 4.6

NEXT STEPS ▸  Beta launch: December 14th

▸  Re-launch with CSG support January 2016

▸  Integrated into Michigan App?

▸  Develop company-facing app for UMich staff?

▸  Additional libraries?

▸  Additional campuses?

▸  Additional spaces?

QUESTIONS?