48
Oxford University Scientific Society May 14, 2014

Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

Oxford University Scientific Society

May 14, 2014

Page 2: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

Crowdfunding Fusion—Focus Fusion

as the Short Route to Fusion Power

Eric J. LernerChief Scientist, LPPFusion, Inc.

Page 3: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

OverviewWhat would happen?Why Crowdfund it?

How can it be so small and cheap?How does it work?

Where are we in getting to fusion power?

What do we need to do to get there?

Page 4: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

What Would HappenIf We had Cheap Clean Energy?

What if we could develop in the next five years a 5 MW energy source 10 times cheaper than

any now available that was safe and non-polluting?

Page 5: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

Economic Benefits

17% increase in real income for median industrialized country resident

44% increase in real income for median person in the world

Page 6: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

JOBS, Services and Infrastructure

$5 TRILLION per year not spent on energy

100-150 million new jobs globally

Page 7: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

Environmental Benefits

• End 7 million deaths per year from pollution by coal, diesel, gasoline

• End oil spills, mining devastation• Total recycling with plasma torch

• Money released to end deforestation, environmental clean-up

• No greenhouse gases• No radioactive waste

Page 8: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

Benefits for Peace

No more war to prop up the price of oilFission energy is obsolete—lock up the uranium mines

Page 9: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

Distributed Power• 5 MW generators, safe enough to put

in neighborhoods • far more reliability in disasters, • rapid deployment to towns and

villages throughout the world

Page 10: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

Would You Chip In?

What if this new ideal energy source could be demonstrated to be scientifically feasible for only $1 million and

a prototype generator developed for only about $50 million?

Page 11: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

CROWD-funding for Fusion

Launched on Indiegogo May 6By June 15: Goal $200,000 for vital parts

Need $1 million, 12-18 months to scientific feasibility

Page 12: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

Why Crowd-funding For Fusion?

International fusion effort concentrated on single device, ITER

Over 50 scientists have signed an open letter urging broader approach

Only brave investors for fusion research—not enough

Benefits all, so crowdfunding asks all to contribute

Page 13: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

ITER TOKAMAK

Page 14: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

Dense Plasma Focus : small inexpensive device

Page 15: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

Dense Plasma Focus :

small inexpensive device

Page 16: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

FOCUS FUSION – 1, Experimental DEVICE

Page 17: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

Focus-Fusion-1 Experimental Device

12-CAPACITOR BANK

Stored energy 100kJ (vs 10 GJ for JET) Capacitor potential 45 kVCapacitance 75 mFPeak current 1.4-2.8 MA

Electrodes: 5 cm cathode, 2.8 cm anode

Page 18: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.comSpiral GalaxyQuasars

Beam From Star Formation

REPRODUCING NATURAL INSTABILITIES

Solar Flares

Page 19: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

Key plasma parameters-- such as velocity--are scale-invariant

In Lab: 10 cm , msecSolar flare: 10,000 km, 100 sec

Galaxy: 30 kpc, 15 MySuper-cluster: 100 Mpc, 100Gy

The Cosmic Connection

Page 20: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

Force-Free Vortex Filaments

Page 21: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

How A DPF Device Works

Page 22: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

PLASMOID

8ns after pinch

Page 23: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

WHAT IS ANEUTRONIC FUSION? It’s a fusion using aneutronic fuel, ideally made of

hydrogen and boron, pB11, which produces no neutrons and thus no radioactive waste.

Aneutronic → No neutrons → No Radioactive waste

Page 24: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

ENERGY CAPTURE DEVICEX-rays, Ion Beams

Page 25: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

SAFE• NO neutrons from main reaction• NO high energy neutrons• NO radioactive waste—electrodes

contain less radioactivity than a roomful of people.

• Generator safe to service without protection 9 hours after turn-off

Page 26: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

How Do we Reduce X-ray Cooling?

X-ray emission increases as z2

Boron 25 x as emissive as hydrogenHow do we avoid this?

Page 27: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

Reducing X-ray CoolingQuantum Magnetic Field Effect

Page 28: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

Quantum Magnetic Field Effect

QMEF reduces Te by >20xCuts X-ray by >4xAllows ignition of pB11BUT only with B>~3 GG

Page 29: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

WHERE ARE WE?Ion temperature— goal achieved —over

1.8 billion degrees, enough to ignite pB11

Confinement time— goal achieved 20 ns—more than 8 ns goal

Energy transfer to plasmoid—over 50% of goal

Density—must increase by 10,000

Page 30: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

Ion energy of 160 keV

LPPFUSION.com

Page 31: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

Generated Interest

Page 32: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

How Does it Get so Hot?Main Mechanism is Viscous Heating—

Haines, others

Ordered Motion Into Random Motion

Higher Densities, Electron Beam Wave Heating

Page 33: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

Fusion ComparisonFusion Yield/Energy Input

Energy output per 1,000 J inputDT: DD:JET 2.2 J 0.01 JSarov DPF 0.2 J 0.00045 JNIF 0.03 JFF-1 DPF 0.0025

J

Page 34: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

Why Does DPF Fusion Yield Plateau?

LPPHYSICS.COM

1.00E+02 1.00E+031.00E+06

1.00E+07

1.00E+08

1.00E+09

1.00E+10

1.00E+11

1.00E+12f(x) = NaN x^NaNR² = NaN

Buenos Aires(PFI)FF-1Power (FF-1)Frascati(1MJ)LimeilNTSCSwierkU of Illinois LPPStuttgart(HV)DarmstadtStuttgart(Poseidon)TAVADIL(PAEO)

Current I (kA)

Neu

tron

Yie

ld

Page 35: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

Impurities from Electrode Vaporization

Page 36: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

34 35 36 37 38 39 40 410

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

Charging voltage (kV)

Impu

rity

/D m

ass

rati

o

Page 37: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

Plasma 1/3 metal by mass, mostly Ag, 1% by number

Uneven impurity distribution causes asymmetric sheath, poor compression

Increase in collision rate with zeff4 prevents

magnetization of filaments, disrupts them

How Do ImpuritiesAffect Performance?

Page 38: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

What We Should See

Page 39: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

What We Actually See

Page 40: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

Why More Effect with Higher Current?

1) Arcing above 2 MA/cm2

2) Magnetization of filaments easier to disrupt

Magnetization depends on B/n. For B2/n constant, B/n declines with increasing B

Page 41: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

Monolithic Tungsten Anode

Page 42: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

Monolithic Cathode

Page 43: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

Steps To Increase Density

50x-- Achieve theoretical density—tungsten electrodes to eliminate impurity

10x-- Increase current to 2.8 MA

20x-- Better compression with heavier pB11

Page 44: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

Getting the B Field• FF-1Now– 0.06 GG

With filaments—0.6 GGFull current—1.3 GGWith pB11—10 GG

Page 45: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

Needed: Beryllium electrodes

Tungsten is fine for impurity, but absorbs too many x-rays

Beryllium far more transparentBut costs-- (single unit)--$250,000

Page 46: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

Biggest Engineering Challenges

Heat Removal—Electrode Erosion• Sputtering may limit electrode lifetime

but with re-deposition a few weeks may be OK

• Anode will be heated by x-rays- key upper limiting factor in repetition rate

• Deposition of boron- key lower limit on repetition rate

Page 47: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

Why Has it Taken So Long?Massive Underfunding:

Tungsten too expensive

Too few large experiments

Under staffing slows progress

Page 48: Oxford University Scientific Society - May 14, 2014

LPPFUSION.com

Let Focus Fusion

emPOWERtheWORLD