View
380
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
ASB highlights for 2010-2011 during ICRAF science week : Lots of work done at the science-policy interface
Citation preview
ASB Partnership for the Tropical Forest Margins:
Science Week UpdateGlobal Coordination Office
For ASB Global
SEPTEMBER 2011, NAIROBI
Goal and Outputs• “Raise productivity and income of rural households living in the
tropical forest margins without increasing deforestation or undermining essential environmental services.”
• ASB1. Site-specific results and cross-regional syntheses of tradeoffs at the tropical forest margins and options for optimizing those tradeoffs.
• ASB2. Results on tradeoffs and policy options are disseminated to national, regional and international stakeholders and policy fora, with particular emphasis on policy processes identified as having greatest potential for advancing the ASB goal.
• ASB3. An efficient, productive and member-owned research network at the national, regional and international scales.
ASB in Time
But ‘sparing’ versus
‘sharing’ debate
continues…
NSS recogni-zed as key INRM concept in PNAS paper 2011
Fairness vs efficiency issue gets wider recognition in REDD debate
CORE ASB PARTNERS
REDD+ REALU Land Based NAMA
Conservation
REDD
Forest management Enhancement of forest carbon stocksPedroni, 2007
Dependent on forest definition
Independent of forest definition
Explicitly cross-sectoral
Project Portfolio 2010/2011
Contributing to / Partnering in CRP 6.3, 6.4 and CRP 7 (CCAFs). Eventually 1.2 THROUGH ICRAF
Reducing Emissions from All Land Use – REALU (June 2009 to Present)
Carbon measurements in Peru
Photo: Tito, 2011
• Contributing to a number of Issues t in the
International REDD / climate debate including:
• Landscape approaches, • Forest definition • Emissions Embedded in Trade• Relevance of emissions / emission
reductions “outside forest” etc• High Carbon Stocks Rural
Development Pathways • Agricultural drivers of deforestation
• Field work in Indonesia, Peru, Cameroon and Vietnam
• A number of Publications emerging • 1 article in Press - LUP• 4 articles in Review –LUP• 1 Book Chapter in Press• 2 Book Chapters in Review• Several Reports and Papers in
development
•
Science Policy Impact (2010-2011)
HOW
• Three Regional Workshops (co-organized with World Bank, FCPF & UN-REDD) Africa, Asia and LA
• Five National level trainings (Indonesia, Vietnam, Cameroon, Peru, Panama)
• Over 250 Persons trained world-wide
• ASB Backstopping UN-REDD Opcost analysis in Panama (ongoing)
Science Policy / Capacity Impact (2010-2011)
Future Focus 1:Swiddens in Poverty Alleviation, Climate and Ecosystem Services- SPACES• Global / Regional
analysis of Swidden Change
• Swidden and REDD+ (And REALU & NAMA)
• Shifting Cultivation and poverty reduction and Environmental services (Modelling)
• Promoting Innovation and alternatives (10 Landscapes)
• Specific Congo Basin Requests on strategies for shifting cultivation within REDD- e.g DRC
Future Focus 2:Linking Mitigation and Adaptation (MITI-ADAPT GLOBAL)
ADAPTATIONMITIGATIONADAPTATIONMITIGATION
FCPF (World Bank); UN-REDD;
BILATERAL FUNDS
ADAPTATION FUND
NAPAREDD
READINESS
REDD & NAMA
ACTIVITIES
ADAPTATION ACTIVITIES
GREEN CLIMATE FUND; ADAPTATION FUND; FCPF (WORLD BANK); UN-REDD;
BILATERAL
NAPAREDD
READINESS
ADAPTATION ACTIVITIES
REDD & NAMA ACTIVITIES
GLOBAL LEVEL
NATIONAL LEVEL
LOCAL LEVEL
1A 1B
CURRENT SCENARIO DESIRED SCENARIO
Land use practices; Policies; Financing; & science-policy interface
MERCI / THANK YOU/ GRACIAS / TERIMAKASI/ OBRIGADO /
Dank U Wel/
www.asb.cgiar.org