17
DECOUPLING OF TWIN ROTOR MIMO SYSTEM By- Murari Lal Garg Vishnuram Abhinav Rahul Nemiwal Kangkana Medhi Under the guidance of Dr. Jeevamma Jacob PHASE - 1

Ppt final

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Ppt final

DECOUPLING OF TWIN ROTOR MIMO SYSTEM

By- Murari Lal Garg Vishnuram Abhinav Rahul Nemiwal Kangkana Medhi

Under the guidance of Dr. Jeevamma Jacob

PHASE - 1

Page 2: Ppt final

TRMS• It is a laboratory set-up designed for control experiments. In certain aspects its behaviour resembles that of a

twin-rotor helicopter.• TRMS is driven by two D.C. motors• Its two propellers are perpendicular to each other and joined by

a beam pivoted on its base that can rotate freely in horizontal and vertical planes

• Joined beam can be moved by changing the input• Voltage in order to control rotational speed of propellers• It is equipped with a pendulum counterweight hanging from

the beam• It possesses a strong coupling between main and tail rotor• So in certain aspect, it resembles of a twin-rotor helicopter

Page 3: Ppt final

Mathematical Modeling • The system is modelled in terms of 2 DOF

dynamics using Newtonian mechanics.• All the effective forces have to be considered.• Modelling is classified as 2 part:1. 1DOF (without coupling)–I. Vertical part(main rotor)II. Horizontal part(tail rotor)2. 2DOF –

combination of both part with cross coupling

Page 4: Ppt final

VERTICAL PART(1DOF)• MAIN ROTOR : using Newton torque equation –

And,

Also,

Page 5: Ppt final

Thus, SIMULINK MODEL –

Page 6: Ppt final

HORIZONTAL PART (1DOF)• TAIL ROTOR:

same as equations in main rotor –

Page 7: Ppt final

Thus, SIMULINK MODEL –

Page 8: Ppt final

• Motor transfer function and torque function of speed of rotor.

Tail rotor-

Main rotor-

Page 9: Ppt final

Simulation and Results (1DOF)

Response of tail rotor

Page 10: Ppt final

Response of main rotor

Page 11: Ppt final

COMPLETE 2DOF MODEL

Page 12: Ppt final
Page 13: Ppt final

RESULTS

Response of the system with unit step input to main rotor and unit impulse to tail rotor

Page 14: Ppt final

Response of tail rotor to various inputs with different main rotor input

Page 15: Ppt final

Response of main rotor to different step input

Page 16: Ppt final

CONCLUSION• Output of system is obtained what is

expected.• Settling time of main rotor is very high.• Response of input to main rotor is highly non-

linear.• There is significant effect of main rotor input

to tail rotor (cross coupling).• With the zero input to the main rotor, the

system is stable at 0.9326rad .

Page 17: Ppt final

REFERENCES• [1] Twin Rotor MIMO System 33-220 User Manual, 1998 (M/S Feedback

Instruments, Crowborough, UK).• [2] Ahmad, S.M., Shaheed, M.H. Chipperfield, A.J and Tokhi, M.O.,

“Nonlinear modelling of a twin rotor MIMO system using radial basis function networks ”, IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, 2000.pp 313-320.

• [3] Ahmad, S.M., M.H. Chipperfield, A.J and Tokhi, M.O., “Dynamic modelling and optimal control of a twin rotor MIMO system”, IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, 2000.pp 391-398

• [4] Lu, T.W. , Wen , P. ,”Decoupling control of twin rotor MIMO system using robust deadbeat control technique” , IET Control Theory Appl. , April 2008, Volume 2, Number 11, .pp 999-1007.

• [5] B. Kada, Y. Ghazzawi, “Robust PID Controller Design for an UAV Flight Control System” Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2011 Vol II, WCECS 2011, October 19-21, 2011, San Francisco, USA.