18
Aaike De Wever , Astrid Schmidt-Kloiber @aaik Research infra-structures: the case for integrating freshwater biodiversity data © J. Freyhof, A. Hartl RBINS Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels BOKU University of Natural Resources & Life Sciences, Vienna

Research infrastructures: the case for integrating freshwater biodiversity data

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Achievements of the EU BioFresh project on freshwater biodiversity. Importance to keep mobilising data and continue the work on the web infrastructure.

Citation preview

Page 1: Research infrastructures: the case for integrating freshwater biodiversity data

Aaike De Wever, Astrid Schmidt-Kloiber

@aaik

Research infra-structures:

the case for integrating

freshwater biodiversity data

© J. Freyhof, A. Hartl

RBINS – Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels

BOKU – University of Natural Resources & Life Sciences, Vienna

Page 2: Research infrastructures: the case for integrating freshwater biodiversity data

Taking freshwater biodiversity

into account in water policy

• Data – solid scientific foundation for policy

• Baseline data – halting biodiversity loss

• Data on connectivity of freshwater

environments

Science 343, 3 Jan. 14, p. 15

Page 3: Research infrastructures: the case for integrating freshwater biodiversity data
Page 4: Research infrastructures: the case for integrating freshwater biodiversity data

?

2010

Page 5: Research infrastructures: the case for integrating freshwater biodiversity data

2014

Vines et al. (2014) The

Availability of Research

Data Declines Rapidly

with Article Age. Current

Biology 24, 1-4.

*

http://datadryad.org/pages/integratedJournals

*

Page 6: Research infrastructures: the case for integrating freshwater biodiversity data

?

?

?

Page 7: Research infrastructures: the case for integrating freshwater biodiversity data

BioFresh: bringing expertise and

data together

Page 8: Research infrastructures: the case for integrating freshwater biodiversity data

www.freshwaterbiodiversity.eu

Page 9: Research infrastructures: the case for integrating freshwater biodiversity data
Page 10: Research infrastructures: the case for integrating freshwater biodiversity data
Page 11: Research infrastructures: the case for integrating freshwater biodiversity data

Data?

Page 12: Research infrastructures: the case for integrating freshwater biodiversity data

Caddisflies [E],

Köcherfliege [D],

ver d’eau [F]

kokerjuffer [N]

Page 13: Research infrastructures: the case for integrating freshwater biodiversity data
Page 14: Research infrastructures: the case for integrating freshwater biodiversity data

Research infra-structures:

the case for integrating

freshwater biodiversity data

Page 15: Research infrastructures: the case for integrating freshwater biodiversity data

LTER, GenomicObservatories,

NHM’s,  BON’s,  

EarthObservatories, etc

PESI, WORMS, OBIS, GBIF,

GeneBank, Pangaea

LifeWatch, DataONE

Are we ready to build a Hubble telescope to study biodiversity?

Virtual research infrastructure and

interoperability systems

Data generating infrastructures

Data repositories and information systems

Matthias Obst @

Page 16: Research infrastructures: the case for integrating freshwater biodiversity data
Page 17: Research infrastructures: the case for integrating freshwater biodiversity data

TheStateoftheWorld’sWetlandsandtheirecosystemservices

1stEdi on2015

Nick Davidson, Dec. 2011

GlobalWetlandsObservingSystemEngine room

Products

• Sahelian Atlas

• Freshwater Health Index

• State of the Worlds Wetlands • Global Mangrove Watch

Targeted users

• Basin authorities

• Decision/policy makers

• Corporates

• NGOs

• MEAs

Partners / data providers

• Infrastructure

• Procedures

• Information Life Cycle

• Data Analysis

• Modeling

• Knowledge

• Data

• Money

Donors:

• Process

• Needs

• Impact

Collaborative Effort

• Access

Stephan Flink & Lammert

Hilarides, Dec. 2013

Page 18: Research infrastructures: the case for integrating freshwater biodiversity data

Thanks!Funding: EU FP7

Data contributors and partners

Coordination and data WP-leads: Astrid Schmidt-Kloiber,

Nicolas Bailly, Klement Tockner, Koen Martens

Platform development: Jörg Strackbein

Metadatabase development: Robert Vogl

Atlas development: Vanessa Bremerich

Data portal development: Michel Kapel, Bos Debusscher