Upload
gpflr
View
1.565
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation by Yadi Setiadi on how to restore degraded mine lands by using native tree species in Indonesia.
Citation preview
Restoring Degraded Mine Land Using Native Species
Dr. Yadi Setiadi Land Rehabilitation Specialist
Faculty of Forestry, IPB Campus IPB, Darmaga, Bogor [email protected]
Function of Tropical Rain Forest
Habitat for flora and fauna Genetic resources
Conserve soil and water Supporting biodiversity Natural resources Maintaining climatic conditions Water cycle processes Carbon sequestration
Factors Forest Destruction
Poor logging operations Illegal logging Forest fires Agriculture development Timber plantations Estate crops plantations Shifting cultivation Transmigration Mining Operations Oil and Gas operations
Potential Resources Under Forests
Nickel
Gold and Cupper Coal Tin Oil and Gas Others
§ Eliminates some part of vegetation; § Disturbed some of the original ecosystem § Increases the rate of soil erosion and run-off
(sedimentation, contamination) § Reduces of native species biodiversity § Damages to wildlife habitat § Damages of watershed area § Changes natural landscape
Impact of Mining Operations
Degraded mined land § Exposed
§ Loss of root and crown function § No vegetation
§ Loss of supporting biodiversity § No top soil and sub-soil
§ Loss of land productivity § Land stability
§ Land slides and erosion § Poor soil
§ Low seedling survival and poor growth
Government Regulations Related to Forest Land Rehabilitation
§ UUD No 41, tahun 1999, Tentang Kehutanan. § PP, No 24, tahun 2010, Tentang Penggunaan Kawasan
Hutan. § PP, No 76, tahun 2008, Tentang Rehabilitasi dan
Reklamasi Hutan. § PerMenHut (revisi) No 18, tahun 2011, Tentang
Pedoman Pinjam Pakai Kawasan Hutan. § PerMenHut (revisi) No 4, tahun 2011, Tentang Pedoman
Reklamasi. § PerMenhut No 60, tahun 1999, Tentang Pedoman
Penilaian Keberhasilan Reklamasi Hutan. § PerMenESDM no 18, tahun 2008, Tentang Rencana
Reklamasi dan Rencana Penutupan Tambang
Restoring degraded mined land
§ Protection • Stabilized and cover the exposed
land • Reduce erosion and improve land
stability § Conservation
• Enhancing native plant species (biodiversity)
• Conserve potential native species • Improve wild life habitat
conditions § Production
• Improved soil fertility (long term) • Produce non woody products • Benefit for local people
§ No change in the
structure and function of the forest
§ Repairing the structure and function of the forest , related to their function
Factors to be considered
§ Land conditions after mining (derelict)
§ Status of forest function (protected, production, conservation )
§ Government regulations (Revegetation Planning, successful criteria, follow guide line)
§ Post mining land use (multi stakeholder)
Revegetation Activities
§ Selection of native trees species § Planting stock production § Site preparation § Soil amendments § Planting techniques § Maintenance § Monitoring and Evaluation § Training
Species selection
Select adapted local species which are: 1. Relatively fast growing 2. Light demanding and low nutrient demanding 3. Produces abundance and decomposed litter 4. Perform or function as a “catalytic” 5. Easy to propagate and to culture 6. Low cost for planting and maintenance 7. Easy to manage 8. Appropriate to land used (forestry planning)
Using Local Tree species
Advantages
§ Recommended by the government § Adapted to local soil and climatic
conditions § Resistant to pest and diseases § Maintains local species diversity § Reduces potential booming of
weeds § Minimizes “genetic identity”
contamination § Promotes conservation program
Disadvantages
§ Lack information of the utilization § Lack information of their ecology
and silvicultural techniques § The seeds or seedling are not
available in the market § Relatively slow growing
Soil Physical Properties
} Soil texture (grain size distribution) } Porosity (aeration) } Depth to hard-pad or impervious layer } Soil compaction (water-logged, root inhibition) } Soil moisture content, surface temperature
Soil Biology } Vegetation cover and carbon content } Microbial population and activities Soil Chemical } Poor soil nutrients } Soil reaction (pH) } Low cation exchange capacity (CEC) } Mineral toxicity
Soil problems
Soil Problems Constraints Oil/Gas Coal Mining Nickel Mining Sand Tailing
pH 3.4-5.6 2.8-5.5 4.2-7.3 5.8-6.4
Compaction Fair High High Low
WHC Low Low Low Very Low
Nutrients Low Very Low Very Low Deficient
CEC Low Low Low Very Low
Al High High High Low
Fe High Very High High Low
EC High Low Low Very Low
Others Hydrocarbon Pyrite Ca<Mg Drought
Soil improvements
Soil amendments
§ Top soil, Fertilizer, Compost, lime,
§ Humic acid, § Bio-enzim, § Bio-remedy, Mycorrhizae § Active compost (TeraRemed) § TeraBuster § Tera-Brik (Soil breaker)
Functions
§ Improves root development § Solubilizes fixed minerals
(phosphate) § Increases cation exchange
capacity § Increases water-holding-
capacity § Improves chelation of heavy
metals § Improves nutrient uptake § Improves potential microbes § Provides macro-nutrients
No
Species Coal
Nickel
Gold
Oil/ Gas
Tailing Remark
1. Casuarina equisetifolia V V V V V
2. Paraserianthes falcataria V V V V V
3 Acacia mangium V V V V V
4 Acacia auriculiformis V V V
5 Acacia crassicarpa V
6 Sena siamea V V V
7 Casia turangensis V
8 Glyricidia sepium V V V V V
9 Leucaena leucocephala V V V V V
10 Erytrhina spp V V V V V
11 Hibiscus tiliacues V V V
12. Anthocephalus cadamba V V
13 Tectona grandis V V
14 Gmelina arborea V V V V V
15 Vitex pubecens V V
16 Macaranga hypoeleuca V V
17 Mallotus spp V V
18 Trema orientalis V V V V
19 Nauclea spp V V V
20 Cratoxylon spp V
21 Syzigium spp V V V
22 Tricospermum burretii V
23 Melalueca leucadendron V V V V
Species planted on mined sites
24 Ficus spp V V V V V 26 Alstonia scholaris V V V V 27 Enterolobium sp V V V V 28 Duabanga mollucana 29 Cananga odorata 30 Michelia champaka V 31 Octomeles sumatrana V V 32 Casuarina equisetifolia V V V V V 33 Fragea fragrans V V 34 Peronema canesten V V V V V 35 Dyera constulata V 36 Shorea spp V V V 37 Eusideroxcylon swagerii V 38 Mangeris 39 Ficus benyamina V V V V 40 Eugenia spp V V V V 41 Melastoma spp V V 42 Antidesma bunius V V 43 Syzigum spp V V V 44 Aleurites mollucana V V V V V 45 Artocarpus V V V V 46 Arenga pinata V V 47 Parkia roxburgii V V V 48 Agathis spp V V 49 Hevea braziliensis V V V V 50 Fruit Tress V V V V
Revegetation approaches
} Minimize application of top soil } Minimize application of pesticides } Enhance native tree biodiversity } Create “closed nutrient cycle” system } Domesticate potential native tree species } Reused local and non toxic organic waste } Involved and contribute for local people
§
Success Criteria for restored mined land
} The rate of seedling survival is high } Plant growth performance is normal and continuous } Root extension can passed on mine soil } Crown closure is fast, stratified and diverse } The system produces abundant litter and
decomposition } The system is diverse and naturally regenerates
through native tree colonization } The system creates habitat suitable for wildlife } Land form (safe, stable and with limited erosion)
Success criteria § Adaptability
} Survival >80% } Growth performance (normal, and progressive) } Root development (across mined land)
§ Sustainability } Biodiversity (Shannon index , Species richness) } Natural colonization (abundance) } Nutrient retention (decomposed litter) } Wild life status (species richness)
§ Stand structure } Plant density (800-1000/ha) } Crown structure (3-5 layers) } Crown coverage (60-70%) } Species composition (Pioneer (40 %),Primary (50%),
Wildlife (10%)
§ Land Form } Slope (leveling <30o) } Erosion status (below threshold level) } Land stabilization (controlled)
THANK YOU
and LET’S KEEPS OUR PLANET GREEN
good for the planet, good for us