Upload
theboylangroup
View
646
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SECURING YOUR PERIMETER AGAINST VEHICLE INTRUSION
SecureGuard®Anti-Vehicle Perimeter Barrier
Protecting Your Perimeter – Why?
Glasgow Airport Terrorist Attack – June, 2007Suicide bombers put many lives at risk at a busy airport
FBI Building, Oklahoma, US – April 1995
US citizen detonates a car bomb outside a Government building used by FBI.
G4S Security Depot, UK – Nov 2007
Robbers ram through side of G4S Cash Handling Services depot.
VULNERABLE LOCATIONS
Airport PerimetersWhile a fence may stop a person from reaching this plane, would it stop a vehicle?
Airport EntrancesModern airport entrances are elaborate with high volumes of glass – easy to penetrate with a large vehicle.
Warehouses / Cash Handling Facilities
Despite their secure appearance, cash-handling facilities and warehouses with high-value goods are prime targets.This depot was robbed in 2006 of £53m GBP.
Power PlantsCritical site of national infrastructure. A key target for a terrorist wanting to disrupt an area.
Telecommunications SitesAnother critical location of national infrastructure.
Military Facilities / BasesExisting or temporary facilities on homeland or overseas soil.
Sport / Event StadiumsVenues, particularly during major events, are densely populated and provide a key opportunity for would-be terrorists.
PROTECTION OPTIONS
Plastic Water Filled Barriers
Units Often Not Connected
Units Often Not Filled With Water
Considered Advantages
Light weight
Easy to handle
Cheap to transport
Quick to move
Disadvantages
Large volume water
Water easily removable
Filled or unfilled – will not stop a moving vehicle
No Security Performance
Concrete Barrier
Units Not Connected
Considered Advantages
Strong
Cheap to purchase
Readily available
Visual deterrent
DisadvantagesHeavy – difficult to move
Expensive transport
Short life span – 5 years
Easy to damage
No Security Performance
Disadvantages
Shrapnel When Impacted or Exploded
SecureGuard
SecureGuard• Developed in 2007• Derived from road
barrier (BarrierGuard 800)
• Developed for UK CPNI (Centre for Protection of National Infrastructure)
SecureGuard• Steel barrier• Tested & approved
by UK CPNI• Tested BS PAS
68:2007• Three available
systems
SecureGuard 30KEY FEATURES• Light weight & no ballast
required• Strong structural design• Rapidly deployable• 25 year service life• Safe design – crash friendly for
‘bona fide’ motorists• Permanent & portable solutions
SecureGuard 30 SystemTested to BS PAS 68:2007
7,500 kilo truck, 90 degree impact, 30 kph
System is rapidly deployable for permanent or portable use
Also tested 7,500 kilo truck, 45 degree impact, 50 kph
Optional fence systems can be added
SecureGuard 30 SystemTypical Anchoring Layout
Anchored 72m intervals along length
SecureGuard anchor shoe arrangement – 8x fixings per anchor
SecureGuard 30 SystemSecureGuard 30 External Intermediate Anchor Shoe
8x Fixings required per shoe
SecureGuard 50Intermediate Anchor
Assembly Intermediate Anchor Location
SecureGuard 50 SystemTested to BS PAS 68:2007
7,500 kilo truck, 90 degree impact, 50 kph
Upgrade to existing SG30 system
System is rapidly deployable for permanent or portable use
Optional fence systems can be added
SecureGuard80 SystemTested to BS PAS 68:2007
7,500 kilo truck, 90 degree impact, 80 kph
Upgrade to existing SG 30 system
High performance permanent system
Shallow foundations
Optional fence systems can be added
SecureGuard80 SystemAssembly Layout
End anchor unit
6m in length
SecureGuard80 SystemAssembly Layout
Intermediate anchor uprights
2m spacings
SecureGuard80 SystemAssembly Layout
I Beam clamp assembly
1 per upright
Allows height adjustability for varying ground heights
SecureGuard80 SystemAirport Layout Arrangement
Foundation and positioning shown.
SecureGuard80 SystemFixing Layout
Shows general arrangement for SG80 fixings
SecureGuard
SecureGuard – Access Points
PAS 68 vs. DOS K –Testing
Table to the right shows energy level comparison between British PAS 68:2007 Standard and US DOS K Standard
Table clearly demonstrates PAS 68:2007 is equal to, if not higher performing compared to DOS K4, K8 and K12 tests
N/A K4 K8 K12 K540
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
PAS 68:2007 vs. DOS K
Impa
ct E
nerg
y (K
J)
Advantages
Transport cost
saving – 144m per
truck
Deployment speed saves
time
Simple installatio
n – not resource intensive
Advantages
Durable – withstands multiple impacts
Not vulnerable to tamper
Low maintenan
ce
Advantages
PROVEN SECURITY PERFORMANCE
Disadvantages
?
Major UK AirportSecureGuard 80 installed as part of perimeter upgrade in 2009. Anti-personnel fence was mounted to the top of the SecureGuard.
G4S Compound PerimeterSecureGuard 30 used to upgrade an existing security fencing to provide anti-vehicle solution.
Government Conference, UKSecureGuard 30 used during Government event as a portable protection.
Major Australian AirportSecureGuard 30 used as added protection along perimeter fence. Barrier positioned in front of existing fencing to continue to utilise as anti personnel fence.
WWW.BOYLANHOMELANDSECURITY.COM.AU
Thank you for your timePlease visit our website for further
information