Upload
manas-ranjan
View
652
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
1. Introduction2. Objective3. Material property of components4. CAD model5. Unfold CAD model for sheet metal operation6. Base FEA assembly model7. Load and boundary condition8. Displacement results for deferent types of
element selection9. Stress results for deferent types of element
selection10. Documents of max value of displacement &
stress for deferent types of element selection11. Conclusion of the presentation
Verification of FEA results by use of deferent FEA modeling methods with same element pattern and assembly method with same load and boundary condition(inertia relief) .
It is a exercise of use of deferent testing methods and what type of assembly will satisfy it in all respect.
Material name
Young’s modulus
Shear modulus
Poison's ratio
density
Aluminum alloy
7.00e4 2.632e4 0.33 2.8e-9
steel 2.10e5 8.203e4 0.28 7.83e-9
Hex model of individual component is the base model
Mid face of Hex model of individual component
outer face of Hex model of individual component
Tet model extracted by splitting of Hex model of individual component
IMAGES OF AREA HAVING HIGHER DISPLACEMENT VALUE ON LOADING CONDITION
HEX ELEMENT TET ELEMENT
SHELL ELEMENT IN OUTER FACE SHELL ELEMENT IN MID PLAN
ASSEMBLY ELEMENT TYPE
NODE SHOWING MAX VALUE
VALUE AND RESULT TO BE TAKEN FOR
REVIEW
HEX MODEL 1.73E+00
TET MODEL 7.27E-01
MID PLANE MODEL 1.81E+00
OUTER SURFACE MODEL 1.82E+00HIGHER DISPLACEMENT
VALUE
ASSEMBLY ELEMENT TYPE
element showing max value
VALUE AND RESULT TO BE TAKEN FOR
REVIEW
HEX MODEL 1.66E+02
TET MODEL 1.14E+02
MID PLANE MODEL 1.89E+02
OUTER SURFACE MODEL 1.91E+02HIGHER DISPLACEMENT
VALUE
The objective is achieved by getting different results from assembly by use of deferent modeling methods without change of base pattern of FEA model.
Same assembly has to go for dynamic inertia relief test to gather output results variation.