Sift based arabic sign language recognition aecia 2014 –november17-19, addis ababa, ethiopia- tarek-gaber

SIFT-BASED ARABIC SIGN LANGUAGE

RECOGNITION (ArSL) SYSTEM

By

Alaa Tharwat1,3

And

Tarek Gaber2,3

1Faculty of Eng. Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt

2Faculty of Computers & Informatics , Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt

3Scientic Research Group in Egypt (SRGE), http://www.egyptscience.netSuez Canal University

AECIA 2014 –November17-19, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Introduction

Proposed Method

General framework

Feature extraction

Classification

Experimental Results

Conclusions

Agenda

3AECIA 2014 –November17-19, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Introduction

Proposed Method

General framework

Feature extraction

Classification


Conclusions

Agenda


Introduction: Why ArSL

• Help vocally disabled people

to speak freely.

• Easy way of communication

with non-mute people.

• ArSL is the natural language

for deaf like spoken language

to vocal

Introduction: Aim of the work

Design a sign language recognition approach to transcribe

sign gestures into meaningful text or speech so that

communication between deaf and hearing society can

easily be made.

السيارةالشارع

What is ArSL?

Translating ArSL to spoken language, i.e. translate hand gestures to Arabic characters

Sign Language hand formations: Hand shape

Hand location

Hand movement

Hand orientation

Introduction: Types of ArSL

1- Vision-based Approach

Requires special set up for camera, but needs some

preprocessing and computational to extract features.

Ex

trac

tF

ea

ture

sCollect gestures

Cla

ss

ifica

tion

De

cis

ion

The Electronic-gloves consists of:• 22 sensors

• Light weight

• Flexible

2-ElectronicGlove-based Approach

Inconvenience of gloves, but ease of signal extractions

Introduction: Types of ARSL (Continue)

Introduction

Proposed Method

General framework

Feature extraction

Classification


Conclusions

Agenda


Proposed Method: General Framework

Training Images Testing Images

Feature Vectors

SIFT Feature Extraction MethodDifference

of

Gaussian

Pyramid

KeyPoints

detection

Unreliable

KeyPoints

Eliminatio

n

Orientatio

n

Assignme

nt

Descriptor

Computatio

n

Feature Vectors

LDAMatching

Proposed Method: General Framework

Training phase

Collecting all training images (i.e.

gestures of Arabic Sign Language).

Extracting the features using SIFT

Representing each image by one feature

vector.

Applying a dimensionality reduction

(e.g, LDA) to reduce the number

features in the vector

Testing phase

Collecting the testing image,

Extract the features

Feature vector is projected on LDA

space.

Applying machine learning techniques

for classifying the test feature vector to

decide whether the animal is identified

or not).

Proposed Method: Feature Extraction

Feature Extraction SIFT (Scale Invariant Feature Transform

SIFT feature extraction algorithm

consists of the following steps:• Creating the Difference of Gaussian Pyramid

(Scale-Space Peak Selection)

• Extrema Detection

• Unreliable Keypoints Elimination

• Orientation Assignment

• Descriptor Computation Keypoints or Extrema

extracted from one image

(gesture) using SIFT

algorithm


Matching between two getures based on SIFT features




The Number of features extracted by SIFT depends its

parameters which has been considered in our experiment:• Peak Threshold (PeakThr)

• patch size (Psize)

• number of angels (Nangels) and number of bins (Nbins)

Proposed Method: Classification Techniques

We have used the following classifiers assess their performance

with our approach :

SVM is one of the classifers which deals with a problem of high dimensional

datasets and gives very good results.

K-NN: unknown patterns are distinguished based on the similarity to known

samples

Nearest Neighbor: Its idea is extremely simple as it does not require learning

Introduction

Proposed Method

General framework

Feature extraction

Classification


Conclusions

Agenda


Experimental Results: Dataset

We have used 210 gray level images

with size 200x200.

These images represent 30 Arabic

characters, 7 images for each

character).

The images are collected in different

illumination, rotation, quality levels,

and image partiality.A sample of collected ArSL gestures

representing different characters .

Experimental Scenarios

We have designed three experiment Scenarios:

To select the most suitable parameters.

To understand the effect of changing the

number of training images.

To prove that our proposed method is

robust against rotation

To prove that our proposed method is

robust against occlusion.


Experimental Results – 1st Scenario: Selecting SIFT parameters

Accuracy results (in %) of our approach based on different SIFT

parameters

NangelsPsizePeakThr

Classifier

s84232x3

2

16x1

6

8x84x40.20.10

10098.994.293.210099.294.294.297.7100NN

10098.996.393.610099.296.396.398.9100K-NN

10098.996.394.210010097.798.999.2100SVM


Experimental Results – 2nd Scenario: Different Training No. of images

Accuracy results (in %) of our approach using different training

images

No. of Training ImagesClassier

135

98.999.2100Min. Dist.

98.998.9100k-NN (k=5)

98.999.100SVM


Experimental Results – 3rd Scenario: Rotated images

Angles of rotation (o)MatchingF.E.M.

31527022518013590450

98.910097.810096.797.898.9100Min Dist.

SIFT

10010098.910096.7100100100k-NN_5

10010098.910098.998.9100100SVM

Accuracy in (%) of our approach when rotated images are used


Experimental Results – 4th Scenario: Occluded images

Percentage of OcclusionMatchingF.E.M.

VerticalHorizontal

604020604020

32.295.698.934.493.398.9Nearest NeighborSIFT

53.396.797.838.995.697.8k-NN_5

45.696.798.952.295.698.9SVM

Accuracy of cattle identification based on image occlusion

(%)


A comparison between proposed system and previous systems.

Accuracy results (in %) of our approach using different training

images

Accuracy in (%)Author93.5K. Assaleh et al. [1]

94.4Al-Jarrah et al. [6]

97.5Al-Jarrah et al. [9]

87Mohandes et al. [12]

99Our proposed

Introduction

Proposed Method

General framework

Feature extraction

Classification


Conclusions

Agenda


Conclusions

Our proposal approach for ArSL Recognition

Achieve an excellent accuracy to identify ArSL from 2D images

Robust against to rotation images with different angels and occluded

images horizontally or vertically.

Robust against many previous ArSL approaches.

Performance of this approach is measured by

Using captured images with Matlab implementation

Comparison with related work

Future Work

Improving the results of in case of image

occlusion

Increase the size of the dataset to check its

scalability.

Identify characters from video frames and then

try to implement real time ArSL system.

Thanks Acknowledgement to By the respected co-authers

Abul Ella Hassenian3,4, M. K. Shahin 1, Basma Refaat 1

1Faculty of Eng. Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt

2Faculty of Computers & Informatics , Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt

3Faculty of Computers and Information, Cairo University, Egypt

4Scientic Research Group in Egypt (SRGE), http://www.egyptscience.netSuez Canal University

Technology

Sift based arabic sign language recognition aecia 2014 –november17-19, addis ababa, ethiopia- tarek-gaber