Upload
futureleadersgr
View
360
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Research of sectors for regional and local development in reserved areas. Research of alternatives for the development of the reserved Prespa area, in a way that is feasible and realistic: - the preservation and development of its natural and cultural values and heritage and - the improvement of the local society’s living standards
Citation preview
Future Leaders researchon development possibilities in the protected Prespa region
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Approach, sources and tools used
2.1. SPP – Identity & Actions
2 2 O t h2.2. Our team approach
2.3. Sources and tools used
3. Key findings
3.1. Stakeholders’ Overview
3.2. Main issues
4 Vision and mission statement4. Vision and mission statement
5. Proposals
6. Conclusions / Next steps
7. Learning experience
8. References 2
1. Introduction
“ We are a team of eight graduate students from different educational institutions and disciplines (social, economic, financial, engineering, management, etc.). In the framework of social corporate responsibility, we undertook the exploration of prospects to preserve and develop the natural and cultural values and heritage of the protected area of Prespa, while improving the living standards of the local community in such a feasible and realistic way ”realistic way .
3
2. Society for the Protection of Prespa
Society for the Protection of PrespaSociety for the Protection of Prespa4
2.1. SPP’s Vision
S OVISION
«Our actions should inspire and initiate active involvement of all local, national and international stakeholders to protect and promote the natural and cultural Prespa heritage»
P t ti f t l l d lt l h itProtection of natural values and cultural heritage
Stimulating and participation triggering actions
Collaboration of stakeholders in local national and international levelCollaboration of stakeholders in local, national and international level
5
2.1. SPP – Identity & Actions
WHO IS SPP:
NGO with the mission to protect the natural and cultural heritage and to p gpromote the continuous viable economical development of the entire Prespa region
ACTIONS:ACTIONS:
Protection of the natural heritage
Research and conservation measures for the protection of the Dalmatian pPelican and the Great White Pelican
Monitoring of the fish populations of the two lakes
M it i f bi d l ti (h t d th ti bi dMonitoring of bird populations (herons, cormorants and other aquatic bird species)
Monitoring of certain rare species of fauna and flora
Restoration and management of wet meadows in Lake Mikri Prespa (LIFE-Nature) 6
2.1. SPP – Identity & Actions
Protection of the cultural heritage
Restoration of a private building in Lemos PrespaRestoration of a private building in Lemos, Prespa
Establishment of the Prespa Centre for Human and Nature
Public awareness and education
Operation of the SPP Information Centre
Publication of informative material
Support to authorities and bodies for the sustainable development and protection of Prespa
Collaboration with and support to the Municipality of Prespa in its efforts toCollaboration with and support to the Municipality of Prespa in its efforts to protect and develop the area
Support to the newly-established Prespa National Park Management Body
Support of transboundary cooperation in the framework of the Prespa Park
7
2.1. SPP – Identity & Actions
Support to authorities and bodies for the sustainable development andSupport to authorities and bodies for the sustainable development and protection of Prespa
Collaboration with and support to the Municipality of Prespa in its efforts to protect and develop the areaprotect and develop the area
Support to the newly-established Prespa National Park Management Body
Support of transboundary cooperation in the framework of the Prespa ParkSupport of transboundary cooperation in the framework of the Prespa Park
8
2.2. Our team approach
Our research approach was based on the following steps in order to identify, segregate and present the key findings regarding the case study:
Recording opinions in a wide framework of local issuesRecording opinions in a wide framework of local issues
Tracing of current situation & social conditions
Correlating major stakeholders’ concerns with SPP’s needs
Identifying areas of improvement
9
2.3. Sources and tools used
Leaflets and other printed material available at local information centers and NGOs’ offices
Internet available data (see references)
Literature and research papers regarding the sustainable economic development of protected areas
S i t t d ti i dd d t t ti fSemi-structured questionnaires addressed to representatives from stakeholder organizations
Informal conversations with locals
10
3. Key Findings
K fi diKey findingsStakeholders’ overview
Local AuthoritiesLocal Authorities
Local Community
Cultural Triangle of Prespa
National Park Authority
Primary, secondary and tertiary sectors
11
3.1. Stakeholders’ Overview
LOCAL AUTHORITIES
AIMS
Development of infrastructure and networking with neighbouring countries
Conservation and enhancement of Prespa’s cultural heritage
Boost of tourism with respect to the environment
Creation of strong organizational mechanisms between local professionals and authoritiesand authorities
Citizen’s satisfaction
BARRIERS
Funding limitations
Environmental restrictions
12
3.1. Stakeholders’ Overview
LOCAL COMMUNITY
AIMS
Development of infrastructure
Improvement of business activities, health, entertainment and living standards
Preservation of the local element and cultural heritage
Networking with neighbouring regions to increase transboundary tradeNetworking with neighbouring regions to increase transboundary trade
BARRIERS
Lack of unity and communication between local community groupsy y g p
Lack of long term strategy for tourism resulting in relatively low quality of services provided
Environmental restrictions
13
3.1. Stakeholders’ Overview
CULTURAL TRIANGLE OF PRESPA (CTP)
AIMS
Mitigation of rural isolation effects on local communities (Greece, FYROM, Albania) in terms of culture, economy and education
Engagement of the local community, interaction and support for skills’ development and networking
Creation of opportunities for children and young people in order to enhance pp y g p ptheir creativity, develop their skills in arts and new technologies and take initiatives
BARRIERSBARRIERS
Ineffective collaboration between local authorities, NGOs and the local community
Inadequate social sensitivity and lack of creative activities and employment opportunities for young people
14
3.1. Stakeholders’ Overview
NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY MANAGEMENT OF PRESPA
AIMS
Improvement of citizens’ living standards through the conservation of natural and cultural values of region
Promotion of awareness and cooperation between the three countries
Protection of ecological value and biodiversity of Prespa
Wise use of natural resourcesWise use of natural resources
BARRIERS
Funding limitations
Lack of efficient communication among environmental organizations, citizens and entrepreneurs
Infringement of environmental regulations by citizens and local authorities 15
3.1. Stakeholders’ Overview
PRIMARY SECTOR (farmers, stock breeders, fishermen)
AIMS
Improvement of infrastructure to increase production
Expansion of product distribution
BARRIERS
Emergence of mislabeling of local products
Ineffective producers’ associations lacking long term strategy
Generation gap between members of primary sectorGeneration gap between members of primary sector
16
3.1. Stakeholders’ Overview
SECONDARY SECTOR (Rural Cooperative of National Park’s Bean Producers)
AIMS
Standardization and certification of production and packaging processes
Branding and marketing of the Prespa beans
BARRIERSBARRIERS
Emergence of mislabeling of local products
Lack of willingness for collaborative action between local bean producersLack of willingness for collaborative action between local bean producers
Lack of modern infrastructure related to the agriculture (irrigation system)
17
3.1. Stakeholders’ Overview
TERTIARY SECTOR (tourist industry)
AIMS
Promotion of tourism and attraction of alternative tourist groups (e.g. agro tourism, ecotourism, gastronomic and conference tourism)
Preservation of cultural and natural heritage
BARRIERS
Lack of infrastructure and services (roads transportation banking andLack of infrastructure and services (roads, transportation, banking and medical services)
Absence of collective action between the members of the tertiary sector
Lack of additional activities to extend visitors’ stay in the area
Unavailable infrastructure to host large numbers of visitors, especially in high seasonseason
18
3.1. Summary of stakeholders’ concerns and needs
•Entertainment•Retain youth •Human and environment relationship
•Irrigation•Organized Association(Pricing, Standardization, Logistics, Mislabeling)
•Legalization •Legislation
Human and environment relationship (ecological measures allowing economic growth)
•Preservation of local element and heritage
•Infringement of environmental regulations
•Legislation•Generation Gap•Disengaged local services (information services)
Social Production
St tE t hi•Health •Infrastructure•Funding limitations•International collaboration•Town planning
•Various entrepreneur actions (Tourist activities, banking services)
•Poor tourist services (food,
StateEntrepreneurship
19
•Town planninglodging)•Branding of Prespa Products•Defining and promoting the Prepsa experience.
3. Key Findings
K fi diKey findingsMain issues
20
3.2. SPP SWOT Analysis
Strengths WeaknessesStrengths •Comprised of and supported by 10 NGOs
•Funding from major sponsor
• Support by E U and national legislation
Weaknesses• Ineffective communication of vision and achievements
•limited scope of field activities, unable to • Support by E.U. and national legislation
•Clear vision & tangible achievements
•Transboundary vision of cooperation
•Accumulated knowledge and experience
commit resources on developmental initiatives
•Lack of human resources
•Lack of sufficient funding
•Passion and commitment
Opportunities Threats
g
pp•Bringing people together under a common vision-creating consent for viable economic development
•Leader in the field of transboundary
•Lack of local consensus
•Infringement of legislation
•Insufficient collaboration with Alb i /FYROM l t i ti
21
Leader in the field of transboundarycooperation
• Making Prespa a model for sustainable development in protected areas
Albania/FYROM relevant organizations
•Insufficient organization of other stakeholders
3.2. Main SPP’s issues
Economic development projects initiated mainly by SPP, lack ownership fromEconomic development projects initiated mainly by SPP, lack ownership from stakeholders and under communicated (by choice) in the local community
Overextending SPP limited resources in economic development initiatives contrary to organization’s main focus (mainly environmental areas)contrary to organization s main focus (mainly environmental areas)
Crucial scientific areas of interest of SPP are difficult to be communicated to local community
Limited alignment among stakeholders (burden on SPP to facilitate and sustain consensus)
Public perception of SPP as a “substitute” of governmental agency in thePublic perception of SPP as a substitute of governmental agency in the area (adding “work load” and obscuring SPP’s identity)
22
3.2. Main SPP’s actions acknowledged by local communitylocal community
1 Research and conservation measures (e g Dalmatian Pelican)1. Research and conservation measures (e.g. Dalmatian Pelican)
2. Monitoring rare species (flora & fauna)
3. Σ.Χ.O.Ο.Α.Π. Implementation (town planning)3. Σ.Χ.O.Ο.Α.Π. Implementation (town planning)
4. Penstock construction
5. Environmental observation in transboundary level
23
4. Vision & Mission Statement
Our team Vision & Mi i SMission Statement
24
4. Our Vision & Mission Statement
Vision / Perfect Future
We envision to emphasize the importance and illustrate the uniqueness of the Prespa region. The main guidelines upon which this vision will be built are:
The encouragement and support of initiatives towards environmental protection and social cohesion
The recognition and implementation of best sustainable and feasibleThe recognition and implementation of best, sustainable and feasible practices, which will enhance local economic development
Mission StatementOur mission is to reinforce the Society for the Protection of Prespa’s acceptance in local community through creative and effective relations which
25
focus on Prespa’s regional and sustainable economic development.
5. Proposals
Proposalsp
26
5. Proposals
5 1 Communication Strategy5.1. Communication Strategy
5.2. Creation of the Prespa Branding & Identity
5.3. Creation of the Prespa Experience
5.4. Tourism
5.5. Protected Region Products
27
5.1. Communication Strategy
WHAT: Develop a communication strategy that facilitates SPP in achieving theirmission statement and objectives in the very complex social local frameworkmission statement and objectives in the very complex social - local framework.
HOW: The strategy has two axes that aim to:
Broaden the understanding and promote the significanceBroaden the understanding and promote the significance of scientific work among the local community: Disseminating consent among local stakeholders about “the uniqueness and the need for the preservation of the area” that should be the corner stone of every action for p yeconomic viable growth. This will be achieved via the polularisation ofscientific notions
Amplify the SPP research image as perceived to the local community:Amplify the SPP research image, as perceived to the local community: Alleviating SPP from the active participation in the economic development initiatives of the area. This will be achieved with the launch of non-environmental research projects for the viable economic development of the p j parea, initiated by SPP. The project proposals should be easier to implement and sustain (met with less prejudism and bias from the local stakeholders)
28
5.1. Communication Strategy
Broaden the understanding and promote the significance of scientific work among the local community
WHAT: Develop a strong communication strategy which will help local community assimilate the significance of SPP’s scientific work, promote the active involvement of the locals providing critical information on how a research project affects them and how they can contribute (volunteering)
WHY: To facilitate the development of environmental consent among local communityy
• To highlight the mutual benefits arising from the tangibles results of scientific work
f f f• To delineate stakeholder priorities, reduce conflict of interest and therefore enhance SPP’s image in the local community
• To promote a strong culture with “environment in mind” in the local community
WHO: Designed and developed by SPP communication and research team 29
5.1. Communication Strategy
Amplification of research image to local community
WHAT: Initiate and communicate research projects on non-environmentalWHAT: Initiate and communicate research projects on non environmental subjects:
Social issues
C i tiCommunication
Marketing fields
WHY: To amplify the SPP image and create stronger acceptance of the role to promote local society
WHO: Students from academic institutions, foreign or Greek, thus deploying inexpensive research capabilities, to work on pressing social issues – structure,inexpensive research capabilities, to work on pressing social issues structure, enhancement of communication tactics and cases, or develop branding strategies for Protected Region Products – and at the same time enabling the development of stronger ties with academia and perhaps cross departmental synergies
30
5.2. Creation of the Prespa Branding & Identity
Strengthen the uniqueness of the area to locals and visitors
WHAT: Create the Prespa Area Logo and uniform design as well as the placement of traditional signs around various area spots, local hospitality, food & beverage enterprises, cultural centers, tenable memorials, info centers and historic landmarks.
WHY: To illustrate the uniqueness of the Prespa region and assist in preserving local cultural heritageg
WHO: Design by architects & Fine Art students, in collaboration with local entrepreneurs, placement and preservation by local authorities and volunteers (CTP)(CTP)
31
5.3. Creation of the Prespa Experience
Create the mystique
WHAT: Collect local stories and legends and place them around the area on signs and maps around historical spots, region’s main entrance, village squares (story & legend collection)( y g )
WHY: To create mystique and enhance the Prespa experience
WHO: Design by architects and fine art students, story gathering by local d d h d l id l l i l k hstudents under teacher and parental guidance, cultural triangle workshops,
placing and preservation by local authorities and volunteers (CTP)
32
5.3. Creation of the Prespa Experience
Create the interaction
WHAT: Introduce leisure activities (e.g. bike tours, hiking / mountain climbing, observatories / telescopes, interactive exhibits in information centers, “treasure hunt” activity water buffalo visits kiting) involving both visitors and localhunt activity, water buffalo visits, kiting) involving both visitors and local community
WHY: To create a strong engaging experience for the visitors of the areaWHY: To create a strong, engaging experience for the visitors of the area, increase days of hotel occupancy encourage revisiting and offer viable economic growth opportunities to local entrepreneurs.
WHO:SPP – Observatories, leafletsLocal authorities – Interactive exhibitsL l it Biki d hiki t t h t i ti
33
Local community – Biking and hiking tours, treasure hunt organization Involvement and participation of information/communication centers as well as hotels on specially created stands
5.4. Tourism
WHAT: Attract alternative forms of tourism (“eco-tourism”, students, gastronomy tourists). Learn, understand and adjust, if necessary, possible existing models in similar protected areas, combining environmental protection with low-budget accommodation and hotel services
WHY: To promote sustainable economic growth of the area and reinforce the connection and acceptance of SPP in the stakeholders’ group of tourism entrepreneurs and the local community
WHO:Initiative and Planning:Initiative and Planning:
SPP, Cultural Triangle of Prespa, Ecotourism Society of Prespa
Implementation:Implementation:Local tourism entrepreneurs through the coordination of the other two organizations 34
5.5. Protected Region Products
WHAT: Enhance of the image of the local products, distribution and promotion th h l l d b ildi d t ki d t f th i ’through local producers, building on and taking advantage of the region’s uniqueness (protection, preservation, purity).Priority should be given to the unique, local product.
“The Prespa Bean”
WHY: To promote economic growth in harmony with the environmental protection (sustainable practices)p ( p )
WHO:Initiative and Planning:Collaboration between stakeholders and marketing / communicationsCollaboration between stakeholders and marketing / communications students facilitated by SPP; reach strong feasibility studiesImplementation:Producers guided by the outcomes of the studies and strategic action plansg y g p
35
F A I t A tiImplementation
Focus Area Improvement Actionptimeframe
Communication StrategyBroaden the understanding and promote the significance of scientific work among the local community
Amplification of research image to local community
Long-term
Amplification of research image to local community
Creation of the PrespaBranding & Identity Built on the areas’ uniqueness
Short-term
Short term
Creation of the PrespaExperience
Mystique about Prespa: Story and legend collection and appropriate promotionInteraction: Development of interactive actions which will have a positive effect to the local community as well as the tourists revisiting.
Short-term
Tourism Attract alternative tourism in order to achieve sustainable economic growth.
Long-term
Guidance of local producers by the special studies which will Long-term
36
Protected Region Products Guidance of local producers by the special studies which will be prepared by marketing/communications students.
Long term
6. Conclusions
Conclusions
37
6. Conclusions
The sustainable socio-economic growth of the Prespa area is very complex.The sustainable socio economic growth of the Prespa area is very complex.
The combination of environmental issues and local stakeholders’ characteristics, as well as the geographical uniqueness (3 nations – 2 lakes) make this task challenging and ambitiousmake this task challenging and ambitious.
Our proposals aim at addressing the main issues we have clearly identified , on a short and long term basis.
At the same time, we set the ground for supplementary research / projects that, upon implementation, will enhance the fulfillment of our shared vision for the area and its people.
38
7. Learning Experience
L iLearning iexperience
39
7. Learning Experience
The Future Leaders Program of Ηay Group,d fi i i fwas a defining experience for us,
individually, as a team and as futureleaders.
We learned how to highlight the internale ea ed o to g g t t e te avirtues and manage our emotions for thebenefit of the team even in very difficult andcomplex situations.
Th b t f th P j t tThe beauty of the Prespa project was notjust the engagement with nature. It was aninspiring adventure, compelled by the SPPvision that goes beyond borders, cultures,
d l l i t t t th i fand local interests, to preserve the magic ofPrespa.
Thank you for inviting, supporting and inspiring us with your vision, as we
40
should do as future leaders in the society.
8. References
References
41
8. References
Leaflets:
Cultural Triangle of Prespa( CTP)
Maps of Prespa’s cultural sights
Prespa’s tour guide and mapp g p
Cultural routes
Prespa: « Agriculture & Environment», one Europe, more nature project
Prespa’s information centers
Let’s discover Prespa. People & nature around the lakes
Florina’s municipality tourist guidep y g
Society for the Protection of Prespa (SPP) for human and nature
Cultural guide of Municipality of Prespa
Project Life-Nature 2002-2007
Bean & Tsironi celebration, municipality of Prespa42
8. References
Books:
Prespa’s Information Center Scripts
«Prespa: a story for man & nature», George Kotsadorakis
Network:
www. spp.gr (Society for the Protection of Prespa)
www. ctp.gr (Cultural Triangle of Prespa)
www. tseaaig.gr (Territorial Quality Mark)g g ( y )
www. prespes.gr ( Municipality of Prespa)
www.ntua.gr/MIRC (The Metsovion Interdisciplinary Research Center (M.I.R.C.) of the N T U A )N.T.U.A.)
http://www.survey.ntua.gr/main/studies/environ/envir-g.html (Interdisciplinary Program of postgraduate studies “Environment and Development”)
b lk f d ti (B lk F d ti f S t i bl D l t (BFSD))www.balkanfoundation.org (Balkan Foundation for Sustainable Development (BFSD))
www.environmentforeurope.org/themes/biodiversity.html (Environment for Europe: Biodiversity and sustainable development in mountain areas) 43