Upload
konterkariert
View
942
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
AV product review test results:Kaspersky Internet SecurityNorton Internet SecurityMcAfee Internet SecurityComodo Internet SecurityPC Tools Internet SecurityOnline Solutions Security SuiteOutpost Security SuiteBitDefender Internet Securityavast! Internet SecurityF-Secure Internet SecurityTrend Micro Internet SecurityESET Smart SecurityAvira Premium Security SuiteAVG Internet SecurityG Data InternetSecurityPanda Internet Security
Citation preview
META-REVIEWInternet Security – Antivirus & Firewall solution
suites
Test result comparison
Version 1.0April 2011
Some tested security suite solutions
• Comodo Internet Security• PC Tools Internet Security• Online Solutions Security Suite• Outpost Security Suite• Kaspersky Internet Security• BitDefender Internet Security• Norton Internet Security• avast! Internet Security• F-Secure Internet Security• Trend Micro Internet Security• ESET Smart Security• Avira Premium Security Suite• AVG Internet Security• G Data InternetSecurity• McAfee Internet Security• Panda Internet Security
matousec
• http://www.matousec.com/projects/proactive-security-challenge/results.php
matousec results – the winners
Loser products according to matousec
Interpretation of matousec results (Quote)
• “The best product tested against the latest set of tests and the Proactive Security Challenge leader is currently Comodo Internet Security 5.3 with the perfect 100% score. The leader is closely followed by PC Tools Internet Security 2011 and Online Solutions Security Suite 1.5 with 99 %, Outpost Security Suite Free 7.0 and Outpost Security Suite Pro 7.0 with 97 %, Kaspersky Internet Security 2011 with 92 %, and Privatefirewall 7.0 These are the only products that reached the Excellent protection level. Malware Defender 2.6.0 with 90%, Jetico Personal Firewall 2.1 with 88% and BitDefender Internet Security 2011 with 84% score come next. All these products have been awarded with Proactive Security Challenge awards.
• It seems that Proactive Security Challenge tests make a big difference between really good products and the rest of the world. Most of the products are filtered in very low levels which means that they probably miss some critical features.”
matousec final results
http://www.av-comparatives.org/en/comparativesreviews/dynamic-tests
AV-Comparatives test
AV-Comparatives results
http://www.av-comparatives.org/images/stories/test/dyn/wholedynamic2010.pdf
AV-Comparatives final results
AV-Comparatives final results
ONLY WINNER IN BOTH TESTSAV-Comparatives & matousec
http://www.av-comparatives.org/en/comparativesreviews/dynamic-tests
http://www.matousec.com/projects/proactive-security-challenge/results.php
Kaspersky Internet Security 2011
Researched by
• @konterkariert on Twitter
• Sources:– AV-Comparatives:
http://www.av-comparatives.org/en/comparativesreviews/dynamic-tests
– Matousec: http://www.matousec.com/projects/proactive-security-challenge/results.php