29
Trends in Visualization for Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles Armoured Vehicles Jan Deraedt 6 th February 2013 – International Armoured Vehicles, Farnborough UK

Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

  • Upload
    jder

  • View
    522

  • Download
    16

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Trends in Visualization for Trends in Visualization for Armoured VehiclesArmoured Vehicles

Jan Deraedt

6th February 2013 – International Armoured Vehicles, Farnborough UK

Page 2: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Page 2

Topics

Trends

Different approaches

Video distribution

Barco offering

Take away notes

Page 3: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Page 3

Trends

• Having more & better information has become a critical capability for protection and survivability, tactical advantage.

More sensors – LSA, DVE More sub-systems More displays

• Effective Information sharing, how ?

Page 4: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Page 4

Traditional approach – “bolt-on”

• Better capabilities (~ information) by adding subsystems each with its own hardware -> duplication: multiple GPS devices, keyboards, displays, battery packs…

• Reduced crew space, payload• Multiple HMIs: increased complexity & workload • Increased SWaP-C signature• Cost & schedule risk

Need for Need for Open, modular & scalable approach based on approach based on standards: GVA !!

Page 5: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Page 5

GVA approach

Open, modular & scalable approach based on standards

•Reducing through-life costs• design and integration costs• maintenance and upgrade cost• Training• Integrated Logistics Support (ILS)

•Improve operational effectiveness

•Reclaiming lost space

Page 6: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Page 6

Open, modular & scalable approach based on standards

•Reducing redundant hardware & HMIs by sharing resources:• reduce workload & room for errors• Simplify and standardise user interactions• Adding new capabilities with lower SWaP-C impact

•Reduces program risk (cost/schedule)

•Latest technologies faster to field -> benefit from technology insertions

GVA approach (ctd.)

Page 7: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Page 7

Use of published & freely available standards– No proprietary solutions– No vendor lock-in

OPEN

Facilitates upgrade & replacement of equipment as required

MODULAR

GVA – Open, modular & scalable

Page 8: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Page 8

SCALABLE

Use same proven building blocks for different platforms (from Utility over IFV to MBT) – add as required.

GVA – Open, modular & scalable

Page 9: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Page 9

Today’s in-vehicle video systems

• Sometimes no cameras

• Different types of lowres analog and digital cameras and image sensors – wide range of video formats

• Mainly point-to-point (stove-pipes), hardly any information sharing

• Analog video matrices or switches for multi-image viewing

• Difficult to expand

• Cabling

Page 10: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Page 10

Trend to higher resolution sensors

• Better information: DRI performance (Detection Recognition Identification), but also…

• Higher resolutions -> higher bandwidth• Lower frame rate ? -> adding latency !!

Ranges for WFOV camera

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

1 10 100 1000

Illumination (lux)

Ran

ge

(m)

Recognition of a person

Identification of a person

Proposed specification

DisplayDisplayImageGeneration

ImageGeneration

Image Under-

standing

Image Under-

standingImage

Analysis

ImageAnalysisImage

Transform

ImageTransform

Image/DataTransport

Image/DataTransport

SensorProcessing

SensorProcessingSensor

Sensor

Page 11: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Page 11

Sharing ?

Need for video networks allowing high bandwidths, many different formats,

resolutions & easy distribution

Page 12: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Page 12

Digital video networks

To achieve interoperability & cost-effectiveness the video distribution system must be based on a standardized, open, proven platform and deliver:

• Networking/distributiontransport of video to any combination of service users & providers

• High bandwidth/throughputhigh resolutions and frame rates

• Reliable, real-time operation - QoSlow, predictable latency

• Flexibilityrange of video formats, digital video and legacy analog

• Scalabilityincreasing bandwidths and the addition of new system elements.

Technology of choice: Ethernet

Page 13: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Page 13

Digital video networks

NetworkGb Ethernet

10 Gb Ethernet

VideoUncompressed

overRTP/UDPJPEG2000

MPEG4/H.264

ControlSNMP

SAP/SDP

Others:

Page 14: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Page 14

Digital video networks

RGB

DVIDVIDVI

Crew Display

Crew Display

Smart Crew DisplayDriver Display

Shared Video

Processing

Legacy BMS

Legacy Cameras DEF STAN

00-82 Cameras

10 Gb10 Gb

1 Gb1 Gb 1 Gb1 Gb

1 Gb1 Gb1 Gb1 Gb

1 GbCVBS

Encoder

RGBEncoder

1 Gb

DEF STAN 00-82

Decoder

Aux Display

Video Server(recording)

10 Gb DVI

Digital video networks

CrewstationProcessor

Page 15: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Page 15

Based on a common multifunctional crewstation HMI

GVA – Crew Centric Approach

Page 16: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Page 16

Networked Crew display

Specifications:– 1 x 1 Gb Ethernet Def Stan 00-82 in (uncompressed YUV422)– 1 x DVI in

• 1600 x 1200 res

– Analog resistive touchscreen– Nuclear event detection/crowbar– 1 x MilCAN– GVA (DEF STAN 23-09)

Page 17: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Page 17

Implications on the display

GVA (DEF STAN 23-09)• Def Stan 00-82 Ethernet video• MIL-C-38999 series III connectors : plating, pinout, keying• Bezel key layout (8 fixed function, 20 freely programmable)• EMC: Def Stan 59-411 Land Class A• PSU: DEF STAN 61-5 part 6 issue 6 • HUMS

Page 18: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Page 18

Driver’s display

Page 19: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Page 19

Networked Video Processing Services

Page 20: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Page 20

Concept of Use– Support connection to Ethernet video network.

• Subscribe to multiple DEF-STAN 00-82 compliant video streams (uncompressed YUV422).

– Output resultant feeds as new video streams.– system to provide a variety of image manipulation

tasks on video streams including;• Tiling, Stitching, Cropping, blending, fusion, Scaling

– Ethernet video input/output• 10G optical

– Ethernet control• SNMP

Networked Video Processing Services

Page 21: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Page 21

Networked Video Processing Services

DEF STAN 00-82CompliantProcessing

& Compositing

Page 22: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Page 22

Video Processing Example: stitching

Page 23: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Page 23

Video Processing Example: fusion

Page 24: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Page 24

Crewstation processors

Rugged computers with the best compromise in size, weight & performance for high demanding vehicle applications

– SWaP-C = Size, Weight, Power & Cost– Fanless versions

Focused on to state-of-the-art image processing applications– GPU based processing using CommonSENSE– H.264 Decoding– Image fusion, Image stabilization, …– Mission Recording

Based on modular & flexible platform– Use of COTS components (CPU and XMC/PMC extensions)

Page 25: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Page 25

SmartView is based on field proven technology: TX display technology and optics DPM computer architectures

– Combination of DPM-2 and DPM-3

TX and DPM thermal design TODAY

Smart Crew Displays

Page 26: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Page 26

CommonSense Image processing

All Barco processors have the capabilities for high performance image processing by using:

– Latest generation of Intel® Core™ processor– High performance GPU through MXM– Dedicated network & video interfaces

through XMC with high bandwidth/low latency path

Full CommonSense support for video capture, video processing and streaming.

Page 27: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Page 27

Some examples - Scout SV

Page 28: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Page 28

Some examples - Wiesel (RLS)

Page 29: Trends in Visualization for Armoured Vehicles

Page 29

Take Aways

Challenges

• GVA is THE way to go for the future• UK is the trendsetter, others will quickly follow• Wider adoption of GVA will be required – (NATO, VICTORY)• Still (very) few off-the-shelf GVA ready equipment

Enabling Technologies

• Networked video distribution• Real-time video processing• Networked, multi-function

crewstation equipment

Please visit us for further details

IAV 2013 Booth E38