Upload
international-energy-agency
View
1.061
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Paolo FranklRenewable Energy DivisionInternational Energy Agency27 March 2012
Citation preview
What are the limits to current policy success? Paolo Frankl Head, Renewable Energy Division International Energy Agency
REWP-RIAB Workshop ‘Renewables – Policy and Market Design Challenges’
Paris, OECD, 27 March 2012
© OECD/IEA 2012
Policies push RE growth
Wind Bioenergy Solar PV Hydro other
Generation
2010 [TWh] 338 296 31 3503 74
CAGR 2005-
2010 [%] 26.5% 8.8% 50.8% 3.1% 4.6%
© OECD/IEA, 2011
Costs are Falling
• Hydro and some biomass and geothermal already cost-competitive
• Additional technologies getting competitive in a broader set of circumstances
• Opens up new deployment opportunities
Data from Breyer and Gerlach, 2010
< 1976
< 1980
< 1990
< 2000
< 2010
1
10
100
1 10 100 1 000 10 000 100 000
PV
Mo
du
le P
rice
(U
SD 2
01
0/W
p)
Cumulative capacity (MW)
Learning Rate: 19.3%
PV decreasing costs by -19% for each doubling of cumulative installed capacity
© OECD/IEA 2012
Mature Markets Facing New Challenges
De
plo
yme
nt
Time
Adequate Possible Problems Progress Blocked
USA – PV
DEU – Solar PV
CHN – Wind onshore
CSP
DNK – Wind onshore
Take-off Consolidation Inception
Hydro
DEU – Wind
© OECD/IEA 2012
Grid may act as a constraint
Strong wind, low load case depicted
Expected load flows for 2013 (based on 2009 analysis)
Enhancement required
Conv. generation
EEG, CHP gen.
Load
Load flow (at max)
Load flow
Source: German TSOs, public data
© OECD/IEA 2012
There are 4 flexibility resources
Flexible power plants
Energy storage facilities
Interconnection with adjacent
markets
Source: IEA, Harnessing Variable Renewables, 2011
A biomass-fired power plant
A pumped hydro facility
Scandinavian interconnections
Demand side Response
(via smart grid)
Industrial
residential
Flexibility is key for managing v-RE
© OECD/IEA 2012
Grid expansion vs RE Deployment
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
GW
th
ou
san
d k
m
380kV 220kV Wind
0
5
10
15
20
25
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
GW
tho
usa
nd
km
380kV 220kV Wind
Example: Spain Example: Germany
Source: IEA Wind, UCTE, ENTSOE
© OECD/IEA 2012
Hydro & pump-hydro: enablers of vRE growth
• Hydropower generation continues growing as fast as all non-hydro
renewables together since 2000
• Global pumped-hydro capacities: 98 GW by 2005, 140 GW today,
up to 200 GW by 2015 or soon thereafter
© OECD/IEA 2012
Lack of Policy Coordination Jeopardising Outcomes?
1990s
• Unbundling
• Liberalisation
Today’s Policies
• RE Power
• EE
• CO2
• Buildings
• RE Heat
• Market Integration
Tomorrow
• Low carbon generation competitive?
© OECD/IEA 2012
Variable RE penetration impact on electricity prices (Merit Order Effect)
Source: IEA, C. Philibert, 2011
© OECD/IEA 2012
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
GW
Conventional capacity Peak Load Conventional capacity factor Variable RE share
Reducing Conventional Capacity Factors
Example: Spain
Capacity markets emerging in several European countries New Market Integration issues?
© OECD/IEA 2012
Exposure to fuel price variability in spot markets
Source: IEA, C. Hood, 2011
© OECD/IEA 2012
Market design and the “missing money” issue
Past • In liberalised markets, renewables not competitive:
too expensive and bearing the fuel volatility risk
Now
• FiTs and RPS-driven PPAs offset fuel risk and fill the cost gap
• Renewables expand, learn and reach competitiveness
Now
• Larger shares of renewables drive spot market prices down (merit order effect) and squeeze capacity factors of conventional plants
Next?
• With current market design and no support framework, further expansion of (competitive) renewables threatened by marginal (running) cost pricing reduction and high fossil price volatility risk
© OECD/IEA 2012
Conclusions
RE policies successful in driving down costs and deploying RE to take-off phase
New challenges emerging at system and market design level
How to foster investment in flexibility resources?
How to reduce investment risk in low-C, up-front capital intensive energy technologies?
How to coordinate with climate change policies?
Portfolio-, system-, and investment risk-oriented policy approach needed