What we wear and we know not the best

The political, social or scientific prevailing are not always the most efficient, or produce the better results for humanity in reducing poverty, maintaining peace or improving the health of mankind. Even the world's most prestigious universities are often funded by business interests.

Consider the case presented in the 2011 Oscar winning of best documentary, he analyzes the actions of several members from Treasure and Federal Reserve, guilty of dubious decisions, who were economists from Harvard University and the University of Chicago. His "advice" such as deregulation of the banking system led to the financial collapse of 2008. The Economic neo-liberal science, who currently recognizes as parents to Adam Smith, Von Hayek and Milton Friedman in particular going through a crisis that will be difficult to recover. The recent book “Shock Doctrine” by Naomi Klein shows that this type of thinking through history is introduced and adopted in countries almost never in a democratic way, but take advantage of crisis situations like political tension, wars or natural disasters. Such ideas are turned into dogmas and defended tooth and nail by "influential intellectuals" embedded in government the same way as with Marxist ideas in their heyday. Neither of these two systems has failed to solve economic problems.

Quoting the author Jeffrey Grupp when talking about the poor application of the theory of supply and demand in international markets when the prices are controlled as in the case of the price of oil. Walter Graziano economist Adam Smith also questioned economist Adam Smith when confronted with the game theory of John Nash the Nobel Prize or parts where players tested did not choose the most favorable option for each one but the second best wich doesn’t harm my interest and the others interests too much. Instead Smith's theory is based on searching only my best interest. Thinking of great individuals through history, it is logical for true human nature not to be always selfish but sometimes altruistic too, although the current system makes us believe otherwise.

The same thing happens in other sciences and scientific disciplines. The case of medicine is typical. Dr. Grishlane Lancout in her book Medical Mafia, states that the "medicine of the disease ”dominates over " health Medicine ", in the first case normally the disease is always seen as caused by an outside invader, an enemy of the body contrary to what she calls health medicine where the disease is seen as a warning of the body that something is wrong, even as an "ally." It is simply an imbalance that occurs in the cells of our body and mind when we treat them badly. We follow the Western dualistic way of thinking, black and white, good-bad to which we are accustomed as a result of wars, conflicts, ideological, religious, paradigms of political parties, class struggles, etc.

According to Dr. Lacout this conflict occurs in the history of science to be regarded as sacrosanct, the theory of Louis Pasteur, who identified the microorganisms as malignant external agents. Pasteur is regarded as an icon and a respected scientist, while the theory of Becalm, who proposed that microorganisms are internal and diseased body when an imbalance occurs, fell into oblivion.

Now continue reviewing other scientific disciplines, the father of psychology is Sigmund Freud. The psychoanalysis analyzes subconscious mind to find the root of the problem and fight it, these conflicts are caused only by desires of the senses, this led him to break ties with the Swiss psychologist Carl Jung who differed completely from this to consider religious and spiritual life as a force for transforming the mind.

In political science Morgenthau realism, where the power is handled based on interests rather than based on ethical considerations imposed on the idealism that seeks to benefit the

sovereignty of countries and the great masses of humanity. The political parties participating in the game of alternating in power thanks to the dogma of left and right paradigm to stay there without producing substantive changes favoring the common good, being the clearest example the USA Democratic and Republican parties.

Now, in the world of finances, using the current banking system whose base is the money without backing or real value, the banker is allowed to lend this “money” creating a perpetual debt within system that favors all kinds of speculative and inflation practices without really producing anything or service anyone and causing great damage to the economy. Privatizing profits and socializing the losses is the unjust norm. Clearly not the best system. The banks should instead be developing engines for moving unused capital where no one exists and can be invested.

In the field of communications, the news and entertainment corporations have to make sure that the content does not oppose the consumption habits, they service the client, the advertiser, they need to “fit” their vision of the way “normal” humans behave and think.. The art of quality or complaint is rarely presented in media. The news is presented without any real objectivity, journalism becoming a propaganda to serve the interests of media owners who normally are infiltrating politics. This we see as like half of all media turns systematically against government, they can do nothing right, ever (that’s easy in because the kind of corruption in Latin-American countries. The opposite is true too, they become "cheerleaders" of it or constantly creating “little disputes" to give the appearance of opposition. The first is true in countries like Venezuela, in the official media and the second is true in countries like the Unites States. Objectivity and real proposal are relegated to alternative media.

The most beneficial and efficient inventions and their inventors have also received this insane treatment. In the field of electricity is famous "Battle of AC / DC" like the famous rock group, between Edison and Tesla where even if the best option because it was the least expensive, subsequent investigations to transmit wireless electricity Tesla failed followed by the employer JP Morgan who withdrew funding, realizing it wasn’t possible to collect money from the users. Tesla himself said in life that the world was not ready for such advances.

The electric car was the best option was sold in the market for vehicles in the year 1915 but was recalled by the Ford Company to prefer fossil fuels and because the car had some problems that had been solved today. Thereafter inventors from small workshops have received the Tesla treatment, researching and refining the prototypes and final product. There have been some timid attempts to introduce in the market but is always seen as a novelty and is not true will of the big companies taking the plunge manufacturers, the exception being the company " Tesla Motors Roadster and Toyota produces now an amazing electric vehicle but its price is too high to become a vehicle for mass use. China is the country that leads the world in the use of electric vehicles especially two-wheelers scooters a surprising number of 65.000 around the streets of Chinese cities." pag.196 power hungry, Robert Bryce, 2010, public affairs, persseus book group, new York

We are accustomed to thinking this way Western dualistic opposites, enemies, instead of competing human humans living in harmony. We are worried about my ego, my profits, my truth, my dogmas etc. As professionals we are also taught to think certain way, basing our identity in the profession we’re in. We think about my Career , my Titles, my Professional reputation, my group of intellectuals, we're terrified of isolation, of losing our jobs or put in ridicule.

For these reasons, as we have seen is hard to go more to spread Pasteur than Becalm, John Nash more than Adam Smith, Jung more than Freud, Edison more than Tesla, etc. The most profitable industries, just by logic hold politically and domain of world public opinion and academia. The oil industry, big Pharma along with the processed food industry need to

influence universities, major media and by extent public opinion. Even the eco industry that has already achieved a position of considerable power to change ideas dogmatic or start using energy options such as electric cars, or new energy research as georotacional, but they pursued his own “alternative energy” agenda which has already obtained large subsides from rich countries governments.

International agencies stand by solutions or trends that almost always favor the same interests in power and political influence of that establishment. From the diplomatic point of view these bodies supposedly deal to preserve peace and resolve the great problems of humanity, but their actions reveal, under closer inspection, a comprehensive policy in favor of the economic interests that wield political power. They are even instrument of these powers that sometimes contributes to improving the image of their cause and they do some humanitarian work but without major profound changes. According to Professor Jeffrey Grupp

But there are two powers that have not been considered; the power of people when they demand the best choice and the power of truth. There are small battles to be won even step by step. Gandhi triumph over military power, there have been peaceful revolutions in the Middle East, people use more and more natural medicine, organic foods. The so-called "banker to the poor" had an unexpected success. The mass media have been losing audience, which turns to alternative media in search of objectivity. And in the political field, sogventry and practical pragmatism is gaining more ground against the policy based on ideology or cheap politics.