View
220
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
API 17NSubsea Production System Reliability and
Technical Risk Management
Don WellsHess Corporation
History / Status
• Document released in 2009• Specification contains:
– Life Cycle Process (LCP)– Define, Plan, Implement,
Feedback (DPIF) Loop– 12 Key Practices (KP)– Technology Qualification
Process– Technology Readiness Level
Plan / Path Forward
• Process– Split into 5 subgroups (now 6)– Industry Leaders– Common Template
• Introduce IM into the scope of 17N:– Define IM– Expand the Life Cycle Processes– Reassessment through remediation– Define TRL progression
Detail
• Expand the LCP– Provides balance and depth to the document– Communication of goals & requirements
4
Feasibility
Concept Selection
FEED Detailed Design
Manufacturing & Assembly
SIT, Installation, & Commissioning Operation
Decommissioning
Detail
• Change to a Dual-DPIF loop– Add Remediation cycle – Facilitates Integrity Management
Current Progress
• We are in the middle of the “Design Spiral”• We are revising TQL levels from 0-7 to 1-9• We are adding comments on “Safety” to comments on
Integrity• We are considering adding “E” (Evaluate) to DPIF
Spiral → DFIEF– We are moving forward as a separate Step– Will reevaluate after completion of effort to consider
making it an overlying requirement / reminder• Addition of Decommissioning may delay completion
Specification DevelopmentDefine Goals and
RequirementsKP1
Planning and Organisation
KP2
Design and Deliver for reliability and Integrtity
KP3
Evaluate ResultsKP3
Feedback and AssuranceKP4
Verification and Validation KP6
Project risk managementKP7
Risk and RAM AnalysisKP5
Supply Chain Management
KP10
Management of ChangeKP11
Performance tracking and data management
KP9
Core Processes
Qualification of Technology
KP8
Organisational LearningKP12
Supporting Processes
Defineü SegmentsüRisksüMitigations
Planü Inspections üMonitoring ü Testing
Implementü Data collectionü Data analysisü Performance
evaluation
Evaluate ü Analyse dataü Evaluate against
requirements
Feedback üAssuranceü Lessons Learnt
Are Requirements
met?
DefineüCorrective actions üRemediation actionsüQualification actionsü Intervention actions
PlanüCorrective actionsüRemediation actionsüQualification actionsü Intervention actions
Implementü Interventionü Changesü Performance
improvement
Evaluate ü TestsüChange implementedüAgainst requirements
Operational Reliability and Integrity
Assurance cycle
Remediation and corrective action cycle
Specification Development
We need your feedback and help!
• Human Factors– Communication from Ed Baniak – May 2, 2013
• How does your company currently assess human reliability?
• Does you have a dedicated group to assess human reliability ?– If not, how is the work currently performed?
• What is the perceived need for human reliability by your projects?
• Do you request human reliability assessments from your suppliers/subcontractors?
Next
• Remaining challenges:– Incorporating Human Factors
• Competency of People
– Decommissioning (Well Abandonment)– Document Matrix– Technology Qualification Appendix
• 17N is currently in first edition drafting• Final Draft Review late-Q2 2013 ?• Peer & Industry Review Q3 2013 ?• Submittal Planned Q4 2013 ?
ThursdayInvitation:• Reliability, Availability, and Integrity Management Forum• Thursday Morning June 27th from 8:00 – Noon
Intention:• Leave with an understanding of where the various API committees have either common
goals or needs• Can we use 17N as a framework across API? • Agree a Path Forward.
Agenda: • Overview of API 17N and Current Revision Activities (Don Wells)• Issues 17N (John Strutt)• Issues - Other API Committees – Open Discussion (John Allen / Jim Raney)• Current Boundaries and What’s Next (John Strutt)• Agree Common Plan to address issues raised – ALL!
Recommended