BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS 2010-2011. How are we doing compared to the standard? %...

Preview:

Citation preview

BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIPNJASK 3-8 RESULTS

2010-2011

How are we doing compared to the standard?

% Partially Proficient

% Proficient

% Advanced Proficient

How are we compared to the District Factor Group?

Relative Performance

GRADE 3NJ ASK - SPRING 2011

LANGUAGE ARTS

Advanced Proficient Proficient

Partially

Proficient

DFGI 12.8% 66.1% 21.1%

Bethlehem Twp.

6.9% 55.2% 37.9%

GRADE 3NJ ASK - SPRING 2011

MATHEMATICS

Advanced Proficient Proficient

Partially

Proficient

DFGI 54.2% 36.7% 9.1%

Bethlehem Twp.

43.1% 44.8% 12.1%

GRADE 4NJ ASK - SPRING 2011

LANGUAGE ARTS

Advanced Proficient Proficient

Partially

Proficient

DFGI 13.6% 66.4% 20.0%

Bethlehem Twp.

15.7% 65.7% 18.6%

GRADE 4NJ ASK - SPRING 2011

MATHEMATICS

Advanced Proficient Proficient

Partially

Proficient

DFGI 46.4% 44.3% 9.3%

Bethlehem Twp.

62.9% 25.7% 11.4%

GRADE 4NJ ASK - SPRING 2011

SCIENCE

Advanced Proficient Proficient

Partially

Proficient

DFGI 64.9% 32.0% 3.1%

Bethlehem Twp.

81.4% 18.6% 0%

GRADE 5NJ ASK - SPRING 2011

LANGUAGE ARTS

Advanced Proficient Proficient

Partially

Proficient

DFGI 12.3% 67.9% 19.8%

Bethlehem Twp.

15.0% 57.5% 27.5%

GRADE 5NJ ASK - SPRING 2011

MATHEMATICS

Advanced Proficient Proficient

Partially

Proficient

DFGI 56.8% 35.1% 8.1%

Bethlehem Twp.

46.3% 36.3% 17.5%

GRADE 6NJ ASK - SPRING 2011

LANGUAGE ARTS

Advanced Proficient Proficient

Partially

Proficient

DFGI 13.4% 69.2% 17.5%

Bethlehem Twp.

18.2% 70.5% 11.4%

GRADE 6NJ ASK - SPRING 2010

MATHEMATICS

Advanced Proficient Proficient

Partially Proficient

DFGI 41.9% 47.9% 10.2%

Bethlehem Twp.

52.3% 40.9% 6.8%

GRADE 7NJ ASK - SPRING 2011

LANGUAGE ARTS

Advanced Proficient Proficient

Partially Proficient

DFGI 22.7% 59.6% 17.7%

Bethlehem Twp.

25.7% 58.1% 16.2%

GRADE 7NJ ASK - SPRING 2011

MATHEMATICS

Advanced Proficient Proficient

Partially Proficient

DFGI 38.9% 43.7% 17.4%

Bethlehem Twp.

33.8% 45.9% 20.3%

GRADE 8NJ ASK - SPRING 2011

LANGUAGE ARTS

Advanced Proficient Proficient

Partially Proficient

DFGI 34.1% 59.7% 6.2%

Bethlehem Twp.

41.4% 55.7% 2.9%

GRADE 8NJ ASK - SPRING 2011

MATHEMATICS

Advanced Proficient Proficient

Partially Proficient

DFGI 46.9% 39.5% 13.7%

Bethlehem Twp.

71.4% 20.0% 8.6%

GRADE 8NJ ASK - SPRING 2011

SCIENCE

Advanced Proficient Proficient

Partially Proficient

DFGI 46.8% 46.6% 6.6%

Bethlehem Twp.

58.6% 38.6% 2.9%

Data Analysis

What trends do you find in the data?

Cohort Analysis: Follow the same group of students from Grade 3-8

3-8 Cohort Analysis: Language Arts

3-8 Cohort Analysis: Mathematics

How are we doing compared to ourselves?

Progress

Non-Cohort Analysis: Different groups of students in a specific grade over time

Non-Cohort Data: Grade 3 Lang. Arts

Non-Cohort Data: Grade 3 Mathematics

Non-Cohort Data: Grade 4 Lang. Arts

Non-Cohort Data: Grade 4 Mathematics

Non-Cohort Data: Grade 4 Science!

Non-Cohort Data: Grade 5 Lang. Arts

7.94

50.962.7

41.2

33.3

6.8

14.8

50.3

54.2

42.9

31

18.3

11.2

47.9

46.6

33.8

42.2

10

17.3

40.8

53.4

49.2

29.3

8.911.4

37.5

52.2

53.6

36.4

8.1

17.5

35.1

36.2

56.8

46.3

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

DFG I BT DFG I BT DFG I BT DFG I BT DFG I BT DFG I BT

% S

tud

en

ts

DFG I and BT Comparison Non-Cohort Data Gr. 5 Math

2006 2007 2008* 2009 2010**

*ScoringChange

Adv. Prof.

Part. Prof.

Proficient

2011

**Stayed at Conley

Non-Cohort Data: Grade 5 Mathematics

Non-Cohort Data: Grade 6 Lang. Arts

Non-Cohort Data: Grade 6 Mathematics

Non-Cohort Data: Grade 7 Lang. Arts

Non-Cohort Data: Grade 7 Lang. Arts

Non-Cohort Data: Grade 8 Lang. Arts

Non-Cohort Data: Grade 8 Mathematics

Non-Cohort Data: Grade 8 Science

Recommended