View
26
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
1
Connecting ASBU with
your State Air Navigation Plan
For: CANSO Latin America and Caribbean Conference 2015
Presented by: M. Tanino, ATO International NextGen Lead
Date: October 20, 2015
2
You will learn…
• Air Navigation Plan (ANP)
• Aviation System Block Upgrades (ASBU)
• Relationship between ASBU and ANP
• Why and What for me?
• What do I have to do to create the State
ANP?
• How the State ANP look like?
3
Safety
EnvironmentEfficiency
Procedures
Procedures
Procedures
$2.2 trillion
2.9 billion
$5.3 trillion
Why?
5
ICAO Global Air Navigation Plan
What is the GANP?• Supports a harmonized global Air Navigation System
• It is an overarching framework
• Addresses key civil aviation policy principles
• Assists ICAO Regions and States to establish air navigation priorities for the next 15 years
• Assists ICAO Regions and States to prepare their navigation plans
5
6
ICAO Regional and Member States’
Air Navigation Plans (ANPs)
• Following the 12th Air Navigation
Conference, a new GANP was
developed and approved by the
38th Session of the ICAO
Assembly in Sep/Oct 2013.
• IP Regional Air Navigation
Plan Template and
Procedure for Amendment
was presented in 2014.
GANP
Regional ANPs
State ANPs
7
New Electrical ANP (eANP)
• Improve access and version control by migrating
the ANPs from paper‐based and early electronic
version into a web‐based platform to facilitate
easy access
• Provide more effective amendment process
• Align the content of the regional ANPs with the
revised GANP and ASBUs
• Remove unnecessary and duplicated
information that is available elsewhere
8
• ANGUILA• ANTIGUA Y BARBUDA• ARGENTINA• ARUBA• BAHAMAS• BARBADOS• BELICE• BERMUDA• BOLIVIA• BRASIL• BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS• CAYMAN ISLANDS• COSTA RICA• COLOMBIA• CUBA• CHILE• DFT UNITED KINGDOM
• NETHERLANDS FOR BONAIRE, SINT EUSTATIUS AND SABA ISLANDS
• NICARAGUA• PANAMA• PARAGUAY• PERU• REPUBLICA DOMINICANA• SAINT VINCENT AND THE
GRENADINES• SAINT KITTS AND NEVIS• SAINT LUCIA• SAINT MAARTEN• SURINAM• TURKS AND CAICOS• URUGUAY• VENEZUELA
• DOMINICA• ECUADOR• EL SALVADOR• FRENCH ANTILLES• CHILE• DFT UNITED KINGDOM• DOMINICA• ECUADOR• EL SALVADOR• FRENCH ANTILLES• GUYANA SOUTH AMERICA• GRENADA• GUATEMALA• HAITI• HONDURAS• JAMAICA• MONTSERRAT
Latin America and Caribbean States
10
• Volume I – Stable plan elements. Amendments
require approval by the Council
• Volume II – Dynamic plan elements – amendments
are approved by regional agreement
• Volume III – Dynamic/flexible plan elements
for implementation, planning and guidance
using ASBU and technology road maps. These
elements require approval by Planning
Implementation Regional Groups (PIRGs) - does not
require approval by the Council
Content of the new Regional eANP
12
Relationship: GANP and ASBU
GANP introduces:
• ASBU approach
• ASBU structure
• Future capabilities
• Priorities
• Technology roadmaps
13
Aviation System Block Upgrades (ASBU)
• Background– NextGen, SESAR, CARATS, and other States provide the
foundation for ASBU
• GANP provides and information on:– ASBU framework
– ASBU modules and associated technologies
• ASBU are designed so that:– Regions and States can select modules and implement
based on their operational needs
– Regions and States can implement modules according to their schedule
14
ASBU Structure: (1) Performance
Improvement Areas (PIA), (2) Blocks,
(3) Threads, (4) Modules, and (5) Elements
14
PIA 1
PIA 2
PIA 3
PIA 4
15
Performance Improvement Areas (PIA)
and Phases of Flight
PIA 1: Airport Operations
PIA 2: Globally Interoperable Systems & Data
PIA 3: Optimum Capacity and Flexible Flights
PIA 4: Efficient Flight Paths
16
PIA 1
PIA 2
PIA 3
PIA 4
ASBU: Performance Improvement Areas,
Blocks, Threads, Modules, and Elements
17
PIA 1: Airport OperationsBlock 0Thread Block 1 Block 2 Block 3
B0-APTA B1-APTA
B0-WAKE B1-WAKE B2-WAKE
B0-SURF B1-SURF B2-SURF
B0-ACDM B1-ACDM
B0-RSEQ B1-RSEQ B2-RSEQ B3-RSEQ
ACDM
APTA
RATS
RSEQ
SURF
WAKE
B1-RATS
18
ASBU ThreadsAirport Operations - Full
AMAN/DMAN/SMAN
ACDM Airport CDM
APTA Airport Accessibility
RATS Remote ATS
RSEQ Runway Sequencing
SURF Surface Operations
WAKE Wake Turbulence Separation
Globally Interoperable Systems & Data
- through Globally Interoperable SWIM
AMET Advanced MET Information
DATM Digital ATM
FICE FFICE
SWIM SWIM
Optimum Capacity & Flexible Flight –
through Global Collaborative ATM
ACAS Airborne Collision Avoidance Sys
ASEP Airborne Separation
ASUR Alternative Surveillance
FRTO Free Route Operations
NOPS Network Operations
OPTL Optimum Flight Levels
SNET Ground-Based Safety Nets
Efficient Flight Paths – through
Trajectory-based Operations
CCO Continuous Climb Operations
CDO Continuous Decent Operations
RPAS Remotely Piloted Aircraft Sys.
TBO Trajectory-Based Operations
19
PIA1 Modules: Airport
Operations ACDM B0
B1
Improved Airport Operations through Airport-CDM
Optimized Airport Operations through Airport-CDM
APTA B0
B1
Optimization of Approach Procedures including Vertical Guidance
Optimized Airport Accessibility
RATS B1 Remotely Operated Aerodrome Control
RSEQ B0
B1
B2
B3
Improve Traffic Flow through Sequencing (AMAN/DMAN)
Improved Airport Operations through Departure, Surface and Arrival Management
Linked Arrival Management and Departure Management (AMAN/DNAM)
Integration AMAN/DMAN/SMAN
SURF B0
B1
B2
Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (A-SMGCS Level 1-2)
Enhanced Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations – SURF, SURF-IA and
Enhanced Vision Systems (EVS)
Optimized Surface Routing and Safety Benefits (A-SMGCS Level 3-4 and SVS)
WAKE B0
B1
B2
Increased Runway Throughput through Optimized Wake Turbulence Separation
Increased Runway Throughput through Dynamic Wake Turbulence Separation
Advanced Wake Turbulence Separation (Time-Based)
20
AMET B0
B1
B3
Meteorological Information Supporting Enhanced Operational Efficiency and Safety
Enhanced Operational Decisions through Integrated Meteorological Information
(Planning and Near-term Service)
Enhanced Operational Decisions through Integrated Meteorological Information (Near-
term and Immediate Service)
DATM B0
B1
Service Improvement through Digital Aeronautical Information Management
Service Improvement through Integration of all Digital ATM Information
FICE B0
B1
B2
B3
Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity though Ground-Ground Integration
Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through Flight and Flow Information
for a Collaborative Environment Step-1 (FF-ICE/1) Application before Departure
Improved Coordination through Multi-Centre Ground-Ground Integration (FF-ICE, Step
-1 and Flight Object, SWIM)
Improved Operational Performance through the Introduction of Full FF-ICE
SWIM B1
B2
Performance Improvement through the Application of SWIM
Enabling Airborne Participation in Collaborative ATM through SWIM
Data + SWIM
PIA 2 Modules: Globally
Interoperable Systems & Data
21
ACAS B0
B2
Airborne Collision Avoidance Systems (ACAS) Improvements
New Collision Avoidance System
ASEP B0
B1
B2
Air Traffic Situational Awareness (ATSA)
Increased Capacity and Efficiency through Interval Management
Airborne Separation (ASEP)
ASUR B0 Initial Capability for Ground Surveillance
FRTO B0
B1
Improved Operations through Enhanced En-route Trajectories
Improved Operations through Optimized ATS Routing
NOPS B0
B1
B2
B3
Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network-Wide View
Enhanced Flow Performance through Network Operational Planning
Increased User Involvement in the Dynamic Utilization of the Network
Traffic Complexity Management
OPFL B0
B2
Improved Access to Optimum Flight Levels through Climb/Descent Procedures
using ADS-B
SNET B0
B1
Increased Effectiveness of Ground-Based Safety Nets
Ground-based Safety Nets on Approach
PIA 3 Modules: Optimum
Capacity & Flexible Flight
22
CCO B0 Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Departure Profiles – Continuous Climb
Operations (CCOs)
CDO B0
B1
B2
Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles using Continuous Descent
Operations (CDOs)
Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDOs) using VNAV
Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDOs) using VNAV,
Required Speed and Time of Arrival
RPAS B1
B2
B3
Initial Integration of Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) into Non-segregated Airspace
Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) Integration in Traffic
Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) Transparent Management
TBO B0
B1
B3
Improved Safety and Efficiency through the Initial Application of Data Link En-
route
Improved Traffic Synchronization and Initial Trajectory-Based Operation
Full 4D Trajectory-Based Operations
PIA 4 Modules: Efficient
Flight Paths
23
Airport Operations
Globally Interoperable System & Data
Globally Collaborative ATM
Effective Flight Path
B0-WAKE
B0-SURF
B0-ACDM
B0-RSEQ
B1-SWIM
B0-FRTO
B0-NOPS
B0-ASUR
B0-ASEP
B0-SNET
B0-ACAS
B0-OPFL
B0-APTA
B0-CDO
B0-CCO
B0-TBO
B1-RATS
B0-AMET
B0-FICE
B0-DATM
B1-RPAS
B1-APTA
B1-WAKE B2-WAKE
B2-SURFB1-SURF
B1-ACDM
B3-RSEQB2-RSEQB1-RSEQ
B3-AMETB1-AMET
B3-FICEB2-FICEB1-FICE
B1-DATM
B2-SWIM
B1-FRTO
B3-NOPSB1-NOPS B2-NOPS
B1-ASEP B2-ASEP
B1-SNET
B2-ACAS
B1-CDO B2-CDO
B3-TBO
B2-RPAS B3-RPAS
Thread
Dependency
PrerequisiteModule Dependencies
B1-TBO
24
Elements: Working Document for the ASBU
1. Narrative1.1 General
1.2 Baseline
1.3 Change brought by the module
1.4+ Elements’ Descriptions
2. Intended Performance Operational
Improvement
3. Necessary Procedures (A and G)
4. Necessary System Capability
5. Human Performance
6. Regulatory/Standardization needs and
Approval Plan (A and G)
7. Implementation and demonstration
Activities
8. Reference Documents
25
Elements Identification• Initial identification is completed based on the
ASBU document
• Collaboration with NAVCANADA and ICAO
NACC Office via North American ANP
• Regions and States can add their specific
requirements as Elements
• Need to work with ICAO HQ to agree on the
definition of elements
• Creation of ASBU
Handbook – emphasis on
Elements
• ICAO North Atlantic (NAT)
has adopted the ASBU
Handbook
26
B0 and B1 Elements (as of Oct 2015)
• Based on the NAM ASBU Handbook
– Most Elements are “derived” from working document for
ASBU
• Need to work with ICAO HQ to agree on the
definition of elements
B1 PIA Modules Elements
PIA 1 6 26
PIA 2 4 16
PIA 3 4 13
PIA 4 3 14
Total 17 69
B0 PIA Modules Elements
PIA 1 5 20
PIA 2 3 18
PIA 3 7 17
PIA 4 3 8
Total 18 63
27
Sample Elements
B0 WAKE Elements1. (Defined: Element 1) New PANS-ATM wake turbulence
categories and separation minima2. (Derived from Element 2) Dependent diagonal paired
approach procedures for parallel runways with centrelines spaced lessthan 760 meters (2,500 feet) apart
3. (Derived from Element 3) Wake independent departure and arrival procedures for parallel runways with centrelines spaced less than 760 meters (2,500 feet) apart
4. (Derived from Element 3) Wake turbulence mitigation for departures procedures for parallel runways with centrelines spaced less than 760 meters (2,500 feet) apart
5. (Identified by the United States) 6 wake turbulence categories and separation minima
29
Did someone asked you…
B0-RSEQ
Improve Traffic flow
through Runway
Sequencing
(AMAN/DMAN)
Implementation Indicator: % of
applicable international aerodromes
having implemented AMAN / DMAN
B0-WAKE
Increased Runway
Throughput through
Optimized Wake
Turbulence Separation
Implementation Indicator: % of
applicable international aerodromes
having implemented increased runway
throughput through optimized wake
turbulence separation
B0-FICE
Increased Interoperability,
Efficiency and Capacity
through Ground-Ground
Integration
Implementation Indicator: % of FIRs
within which all applicable ACCs have
implemented at least one interface to use
AIDC / OLDI with neighbouring ACCs
30
How did you answer?
B0-RSEQ
Improve Traffic flow
through Runway
Sequencing
(AMAN/DMAN)
Implementation Indicator: % of
applicable international aerodromes
having implemented AMAN / DMAN
B0-WAKE
Increased Runway
Throughput through
Optimized Wake
Turbulence Separation
Implementation Indicator: % of
applicable international aerodromes
having implemented increased runway
throughput through optimized wake
turbulence separation
B0-FICE
Increased Interoperability,
Efficiency and Capacity
through Ground-Ground
Integration
Implementation Indicator: % of FIRs
within which all applicable ACCs have
implemented at least one interface to use
AIDC / OLDI with neighbouring ACCs
31
Definition: Modules vs Elements
• Set of airports
• For a specific airport, (Element
Definition) AMAN via controlled time of
arrival to a reference fix
B0-RSEQ
Improve Traffic flow
through Runway
Sequencing
(AMAN/DMAN)
Implementation Indicator: % of
applicable international aerodromes
having implemented AMAN / DMAN
32
B0-WAKE
Increased Runway
Throughput through
Optimized Wake
Turbulence Separation
Implementation Indicator: % of
applicable international aerodromes
having implemented increased runway
throughput through optimized wake
turbulence separation
Definition: Modules vs Elements
• Set of airports
• For a specific airport, (One Element Definition) Wake
independent departure and arrival procedures for parallel
runways with centrelines spaced less than 760 meters (2,500
feet) apart
• For a specific airport, (Another Element Definition) Wake
turbulence mitigation for departures procedures for parallel
runways with centrelines spaced less than 760 meters (2,500
feet) apart
33
Definition: Modules vs Elements
• AIDC to provide initial flight data to adjacent ATSUs
• AIDC to update previously coordinated flight data
• AIDC for control transfer
• AIDC to transfer CPDLC logon information to the Next
Data Authority
B0-FICE
Increased
Interoperability,
Efficiency and Capacity
through Ground-
Ground Integration
Implementation Indicator: % of FIRs
within which all applicable ACCs
have implemented at least one
interface to use AIDC / OLDI with
neighbouring ACCs
34
Ask Different Questions
• Do you need this capability at some
airports?
• If yes, are you in planning phase or
implementation phase?
• Did this capability implemented?
B0-RSEQ
Improve Traffic flow
through Runway
Sequencing
(AMAN/DMAN)
Question: % of applicable
international aerodromes having
implemented AMAN / DMAN
Element: AMAN via controlled time of arrival to a reference fix
35
Different Indicators
1. x of y Table AOP-1 airports assessed
2. z of x implementations planned
3. w of x implementations implementedWhere:
• x=the number of implementations that are assessed as “Need”
• y=the total number of Table AOP-1 aerodromes
• z=the number of needed implementations that are in Planning status
• w=the number of needed implementations that are implemented
Element: AMAN via controlled time of arrival to a
reference fix
36
ASBU Element Analysis and
Implementation Process
• Evaluate Elements one
by one– Understand environments
– Understand needs
– Understand status
– Prioritize
– Plan accordingly
• Reporting
• If fails…– Analysis Not Started
41
The No Country Left Behind (NCLB) campaign highlights ICAO’s
efforts to assist States in implementing ICAO Standards and
Recommended Practices (SARPs). The main goal of this work is to help
ensure that SARP implementation is better harmonized globally so that
all States have access to the significant socio-economic benefits of safe
and reliable air transport.
Many “Analysis Not Started” is an indication of trouble.
43
Air Navigation Report Form (ANRF)
• Purpose– Report the implementation status
– Report qualitative performance benefits
– Provide the progress status via web viewer
• Use the same report form for Regions and States
• One ANRF per module
• Specific focus on what will be reported
44
Qualitative Performance Benefits
5 out of 11 KPAs are selected for the ANRF
– Access/Equity
– Capacity
– Efficiency
– Environment
– Safety
ANRF provides the qualitative benefit
descriptions for each module
ICAO expects States to provide data for the
chosen metrics
45
Technology Roadmaps
1. Communication 3. Navigation 5. Avionics
• A/G Data comm • Dedicated technology • Communications
• G/G comm • Performance-based
Navigation
• Surveillance
• A/G voice comm • Navigation
2. Surveillance 4. Information
Management
• Aircraft safety nets
• Surface surveillance • SWIM • Onboard systems
• Ground-based
surveillance
• Other
• A/A Surveillance
46
Summary of ASBU and ANP
• Understand ASBU B0 Elements
• Evaluate ASBU B0 Elements
• Use ANRF to
plan/monitor/report
• State ANP
47
Put Together for your ANP
• Consider Regional eANP Volume III
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part 0 – Introduction
Part 1 – General Planning Aspects
Part 2 – Air Navigation System/ASBU
Implementation
Part 3 – Air Navigation System/Regional
Aviation System Improvement
48
Your “possible” ANP
Part 1• Analysis and
Implementation
Workflow
• Status Indicator(s)
for each ASBU
Elements
• Status Indicator(s)
for each State
specific
improvements
Part 2• Status Table for
each ASBU
Elements
Part 3• Explanation of
State specific
improvements
• Status (Table) for
each State specific
improvements
Appendix• ANRFs
49
• All Block 0 Elements are evaluated/reviewed
– Initial FAA status was shared via ICAO WP/IP in multiple regional meetings in 2014
– 47 Elements identified in 2014 status reporting (either implemented or N/A status)
– 63 Elements identified in October 2015 and all status are known (majority are implemented or N/A. A few of them are in progress.)
– Using modified Air Navigation Report Form (ANRF)
FAA Status:
ASBU Block 0 Elements Implementation
50
FAA Activities to Support ASBU
• Elements identification
• ASBU analysis and implementation process
• ANRF improvements and usage
• eANP Volume III
– NAM eANP
– NAT eANP
– Sharing information with other regions
• ASBU Workshops
– Collaboration with CAAS, JCAB, and CANSO
Recommended