CURL/RSLP Collection Mapping Project

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

CURL/RSLP Collection Mapping Project. Chris Bailey Acting Director Library Services University of Glasgow. About CURL. http://www.curl.ac.uk/ - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

March 2002

CURL/RSLP Collection Mapping Project

Chris BaileyActing Director Library

ServicesUniversity of Glasgow

March 2002

About CURL• http://www.curl.ac.uk/• “…to optimise the combined

information resources and expertise of the CURL libraries, in partnership with relevant organisations, for the benefit of research scholarship…”

• “…the development of a national collection mapping strategy…”

March 2002

Concerns…• Different communities, different

approaches

• Inconsistent collection description

• Inconsistencies in retrieval

March 2002

OCLC/Lacey• Automated collection analysis

software• Uses standard classification schemes• Maps to Conspectus headings• Analysis to title level• Institutional analysis• Consortial analysis

March 2002

RSLP • CURL response to Circular 2000/3

• Proposal to co-fund a pilot project on collection mapping using iCas

March 2002

The Project• Purpose• Partners• Process• Methodology• Preliminary Results

March 2002

Purpose• Small pilot project• Evaluate the usefulness of the

methodology used • Provide a cross institutional

analysis to compare overlap and uniqueness

March 2002

Partners• University of Edinburgh• University of Liverpool• Imperial College• University of Hull• SOAS• Natural History Museum

March 2002

Process• Questionnaire to be submitted by

each partner• Test file supplied by each partner• OPAC upload to OCLC/Lacey• Data analysis by OCLC

…….approx 9 months in total………

March 2002

Methodology• De-duplication• Records matched to WorldCat in

order to locate an LC classification• Conspectus analysis• Results provided on CD

March 2002

Results

• Sent 2,767,669 bibliographic records

• De-duplication – 2,707,696 records• 2,268,225 records analysed – 84%

March 2002

Results….• Edinburgh – 78% analysis• Liverpool – 85% analysis• Imperial – 74% analysis• Hull – 99% analysis• SOAS – 92% analysis• NHM – 47% analysis

March 2002

Issues…• Standard use of standard

classification seems OK…• Local adaptation of standard

classification causes inconsistencies

• Issues relating to the standards….

March 2002

…watch this space!….

March 2002

March 2002

March 2002

March 2002

March 2002

March 2002

March 2002

March 2002

March 2002